Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy by Using an Ultra-slim Upper Endoscope

October 26, 2022 updated by: Jong Ho Moon, Soonchunhyang University Hospital

A Prospective Randomized Trial of a New Multibending Versus Conventional Ultra-slim Endoscope for Direct Peroral Cholangioscopy Without Device Assistance

This study was aimed to to evaluate the efficacy of the new multibending ultra-slim endoscope compared with a conventional ultra-slim endoscope for free-hand insertion of an endoscope into the bile duct for direct POC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Currently available peroral cholangioscopy (POC) is a duodenoscopy-assisted procedure that does not involve directly inserting an endoscope into the biliary tree. A prototype multibending (MB) ultra-slim endoscope has been developed as a dedicated cholangioscope to overcome the technical difficulties of direct POC. In this study, the investigators evaluated the efficacy of the new MB ultra-slim endoscope compared with a conventional ultra-slim endoscope for free-hand insertion of an endoscope into the bile duct for direct POC without the assistance of accessories. The primary outcome was the technical success of free-hand insertion of the endoscope during direct POC, which was defined as successful insertion of the endoscope through the ampulla of Vater and advancement of the endoscope up to the bifurcation or to the obstructed segment of the biliary tree without any accessories within 15 min.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
92

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of, 420-767
        • Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • biliary disease requiring diagnostic and/or therapeutic direct POC
  • distal common bile duct (CBD) dilation > 8 mm
  • previous sphincteroplasty, including major endoscopic sphincterotomy and/or endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation during a prior ERCP
  • ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of any contraindication to ERCP
  • bleeding tendency (international normalized ratio > 1.5 or platelet count < 50,000/ mm3)
  • diffuse stricture of the distal CBD
  • diagnosis of pancreatic cancer or tumor at the ampulla of Vater (AOV)
  • altered gastrointestinal anatomy or significant duodenal obstruction

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MB group
Direct POC performed with third-generation prototype multibending ultra-slim endoscope (CHF-Y0010; Olympus Medical Systems, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)
Device: Direct peroral cholangioscopy
The multibending (MB) or conventional ultra-slim endoscope was inserted through the mouth. After facing the papillary orifice, the endoscope was inserted directly, without any accessories, into the distal bile duct. The second bending of the MB ultra-slim endoscope was kept in an upward angled position to achieve a more acute angle of the endoscope tip for entering the distal CBD. Then, the endoscope was pushed by steering the first bend into an upward angle ("α" shape) or the endoscope was pulled by steering the first bend into an upward angle and torqueing it counter-clockwise ("u" shape) for insertion into the distal CBD. If the distal bile duct was visualized on an endoscopic view, carbon dioxide insufflation was stopped. The endoscope was advanced into the hilum or the obstructed segment of the extrahepatic bile duct under fluoroscopic and endoscopic control. Then, the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were performed during direct POC as necessary.
Active Comparator: Conventional group
Direct POC performed with conventional ultra-slim endoscope (GIF-XP290N; Olympus Medical Systems, Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)
Device: Direct peroral cholangioscopy
The multibending (MB) or conventional ultra-slim endoscope was inserted through the mouth. After facing the papillary orifice, the endoscope was inserted directly, without any accessories, into the distal bile duct. The second bending of the MB ultra-slim endoscope was kept in an upward angled position to achieve a more acute angle of the endoscope tip for entering the distal CBD. Then, the endoscope was pushed by steering the first bend into an upward angle ("α" shape) or the endoscope was pulled by steering the first bend into an upward angle and torqueing it counter-clockwise ("u" shape) for insertion into the distal CBD. If the distal bile duct was visualized on an endoscopic view, carbon dioxide insufflation was stopped. The endoscope was advanced into the hilum or the obstructed segment of the extrahepatic bile duct under fluoroscopic and endoscopic control. Then, the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions were performed during direct POC as necessary.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The technical success rate of free-hand insertion of an ultra-slim endoscope during direct POC
Time Frame: within 15 min after insertion of endoscope into the mouth
successful insertion of the endoscope through the AOV and advancement up to the bifurcation or obstructed segment of the biliary tree, without any accessories
within 15 min after insertion of endoscope into the mouth

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure time required for free-hand insertion
Time Frame: the time of oral intubation with the ultra-slim endoscope to the time of reaching the obstructed segment of the biliary tree or bifurcation, within 15 min after insertion of endoscope into the mouth
Procedure time required for free-hand insertion
the time of oral intubation with the ultra-slim endoscope to the time of reaching the obstructed segment of the biliary tree or bifurcation, within 15 min after insertion of endoscope into the mouth
The technical success of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after Completion of DPOC
The technical success of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions
Within 24 hours after Completion of DPOC
Adverse events related to direct POC
Time Frame: Within 7 days after DPOC
perforation, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and air embolism
Within 7 days after DPOC

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jong Ho Moon, M.D., Ph.D., Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2014-07-026

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings