The Effects of ADHD Medication (TEAM) Study (TEAM)

November 27, 2023 updated by: Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

The Effects of ADHD Medication (TEAM) Study: Neurobehavioral Effects of Abrupt Methylphenidate Discontinuation

This study evaluates the effects of receiving and then discontinuing methylphenidate (MPH) in children with ADHD. After receiving MPH for 8 weeks, participants will be randomized to either discontinue MPH (and receive placebo) OR remain on MPH for 4 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) is the most commonly prescribed psychoactive medication in children. An abundance of studies attest to the efficacy of MPH for attenuating inattentive, hyperactive, and impulsive symptoms in children with ADHD. Despite its efficacy, most children with ADHD who are prescribed MPH have poor continuity of treatment for a variety of reasons, including forgetting to administer the medication and delays obtaining refills. In addition, it is an accepted clinical practice for physicians to omit MPH for periods of time, such as during the summer or on weekends (i.e., drug holidays). Since MPH discontinuation is considered to be benign, many clinicians do not employ any special procedures or inform families of any special precautions in regard to its cessation. However, increasing evidence suggests that the pharmacological effects of MPH cause lasting changes in brain neurochemistry that persist beyond medication discontinuation. Moreover, these neurobiological effects of discontinuation appear to have neurobehavioral consequences. There is a critical need to better understand the breadth and magnitude of the neurobehavioral effects caused by MPH discontinuation as well as to better understand the temporal trajectory of these deleterious effects. Hence, the primary goal of the proposed research is to conduct the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial specifically designed to study the negative effects of MPH discontinuation at multiple time points. 180 children diagnosed with ADHD will participate across two recruitment sites. After undergoing a 4-week MPH titration trial and 4-week MPH maintenance phase, participants will be randomized to either discontinue MPH (and receive placebo) OR remain on MPH for 4 weeks. Comprehensive multi-time point, multi-informant (parents, teachers, study staff) and multi-modal (behavior/mood/affect ratings scales, direct behavior observations, standardized testing) assessments will be used to assess a broad range of neurobehavioral outcomes. We will examine the magnitude and time course of effects of MPH discontinuation on behavioral as well as cognitive and academic functioning in children with ADHD. Furthermore, we will examine moderators of the adverse effects of MPH discontinuation on these outcomes to aid in the identification of those who are at increased risk.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
204

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ADHD Diagnostic Status: Meets DSM-V criteria for ADHD, with Clinical Global Impression (CGI) rating corresponding to at least "moderately ill."
  2. Cognitive and Academic Functioning: Intelligence Quotient (IQ) of >80 as estimated by Vocabulary and Block Design subtests of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-4th Edition and scaled scores >80 on the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-2nd edition Reading and Math subtests
  3. Physical Health: Physical exam and ECG findings are judged to be normal for age and sex by study physician and/or medical consultant, and there is no co-existing condition for which MPH is contraindicated 4. School: Enrolled in a school setting rather than a home-school program. This ensures that we can obtain parent and teacher ratings from separate individuals for diagnosis and outcome assessment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Psychiatric Medications: Current or prior use of any medication for psychological/psychiatric problems
  2. Behavioral Interventions: Current active participation in ADHD-related behavioral interventions, given that improvements due to these interventions may confound our group comparisons
  3. Psychiatric or Neurobehavioral Conditions: Children with mania/hypomania, schizophrenia, or severe depressive disorder, as determined by the K-SADS, will be excluded since ADHD medications may not be an appropriate first line of treatment for children with these comorbid disorders
  4. Organic Brain Injury: History of head trauma, neurological disorder (including epilepsy), or other disorder affecting brain function due to potential differences in neurophysiology of ADHD phenotype
  5. Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Children with a personal history or family history of cardiovascular risk factors will be excluded, or given the option of participating in the study after obtaining an EKG and verification from a pediatric cardiologist regarding the safety of their participation in a trial of methylphenidate. In this case, families will be responsible for the costs of EKG and any necessary cardiologist evaluation
  6. Pregnancy: The safety of MPH use during pregnancy has not been established

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: MPH Discontinuation
  1. Double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled 4-week methylphenidate (MPH) titration trial. Pts will receive 3 active dosages of MPH (children <25kg: 18mg, 27mg, 36mg; children >25kg: 18mg, 36mg, 54mg for) as well as 1 random week of placebo, given qAM. Pts will begin on the lowest dose (or a randomized placebo week) and proceed through all dose conditions in an incremental fashion.
  2. DB 4-week MPH maintenance phase. The clinician, parent, and teacher ratings of behavior and side effects from the titration trial weeks will be graphed. Two doctors will blindly review the graphs and judge which week was the optimal dose week. Pts will then receive their optimal dose of MPH (qAM) for 4 weeks.
  3. DB 4-week MPH Discontinuation Phase. Pts in this arm will receive placebo (qAM).
Drug: OROS-Methylphenidate (MPH)
OROS-methylphenidate will be taken orally once daily at doses that have been approved for the study age group by the U.S. FDA.
Other Names:
  • Concerta
Active Comparator: Sustained MPH
  1. Double-blind (DB) placebo-controlled 4-week methylphenidate (MPH) titration trial. Pts will receive 3 active dosages of MPH (children <25kg: 18mg, 27mg, 36mg; children >25kg: 18mg, 36mg, 54mg for) as well as 1 random week of placebo, given qAM. Pts will begin on the lowest dose (or a randomized placebo week) and proceed through all dose conditions in an incremental fashion.
  2. DB 4-week MPH maintenance phase. The clinician, parent, and teacher ratings of behavior and side effects from the titration trial weeks will be graphed. Two doctors will blindly review the graphs and judge which week was the optimal dose week. Pts will then receive their optimal dose of MPH (qAM) for 4 weeks.
  3. DB 4-week MPH Discontinuation Phase. Pts in this arm will continue their optimal MPH dose (qAM).
Drug: OROS-Methylphenidate (MPH)
OROS-methylphenidate will be taken orally once daily at doses that have been approved for the study age group by the U.S. FDA.
Other Names:
  • Concerta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent ADHD Total Symptom Scores
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12
Parent Vanderbilt ADHD Rating Scale Total Symptom Score, minimum=0, maximum=54, higher scores indicate more/worse ADHD symptoms
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12
Math Computation - Number of Problems Completed Correctly
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
Math Computation Curriculum-Based Measure - Number of Problems Completed Correctly. Minimum=0, Maximum=600. Higher scores indicate improved/better performance
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
Inhibitory Control Reaction Time Variability (SD of the Reaction Time)
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
Assessed via the Go/No-Go computerized measure of inhibitory control reaction time variability (with standard deviation of the reaction time being the indicator variability variability). Unit of measure is msec. Minimum is 0, Maximum is 500. Higher scores indicate more variability (higher standard deviation) in reaction time, indicating worse outcome (more characteristic of individuals with ADHD and less characteristic of typically developing individuals).
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 & 12
% Time on Task
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12
Participants were videotaped while completing the 20-minute Analogue Math task. Their behavior was coded in 20-second intervals by trained coders who determined if the children were on-task or off-task during each interval. The amount of time coded as on-task was divided by the total amount of time and then multiplied by 100 to generate the % of time on task variable.
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10, 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barkley Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) Ratings
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
assessed via parent-completed Barkley Sluggish Cognitive Tempo Scale. Minimum=12, Max=48, higher scores indicate worse outcome.
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Parent Ratings of Emotional Regulation
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
assessed via parent-completed Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC). Outcome assessed is ERC total mean score: minimum value=1, max value=4, higher scores indicate worse outcome
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Spatial Working Memory
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Spatial working memory was assessed via the Corsi Computerized Spatial Span Task, which requires the participant to reproduce a sequence of movements by tapping a series of blocks on a computer screen in the same order demonstrated by the examiner. Outcome of interest is total trials correct. Minimum score=0, max score=10. Higher scores indicate better performance.
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Math Reasoning
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12
Math reasoning was assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Math Concepts and Applications. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).
baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12
Reading Comprehension
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Reading Comprehension was assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Reading Comprehension. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).
baseline, study weeks 8, 9, 10 &12
Written Expression
Time Frame: baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12
Assessed by child completion of the AIMSWEB curriculum based measure (CBM) test of Written Expression, with the measure assessing number of words written by the child after receiving a prompt. At baseline (week 1), child's performance was assigned a value of 1.0. The child's performance at weeks 8, 9, 10, and 12 was derived by dividing actual score (# of words written) on the test by the score predicted at that time point after applying the measure's normed "rate of improvement (ROI)" metric to the baseline score. For example, a score of 1.5 at week 8 would indicate that the child's actual score at week 8 was 50% higher than the predicted score at week 8 (which was derived by applying the normed ROI metric to the baseline score). Scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are >1.0 indicate greater improvement than expected (so better outcome), while scores at weeks 8, 9, 10, 12 that are <1.0 indicate less improvement than expected (so worse outcome).
baseline, study weeks 1, 8, 9, 10 &12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Seattle Children's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tanya E. Froehlich, MD, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 12, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ADHDMedTEAMStudy

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings