The Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation for Mild-to-moderate Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis

May 22, 2016 updated by: Wenhu Liu
Microwave ablation, as a new method to therapy secondary hyperparathyroidism(SHPT), now is developing rapidly. However, it is still unknown whether it is effective to accept microwave ablation for hemodialysis patients with mild-to-moderate SHPT. In this prospective, randomised control and paried clinical trial study, the investigators will observe the efficiency and safety of microwave ablation in hemodialysis patients with mild-to-moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism. The patients in age-matched control group will accept active Vitamin D therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Secondary hyperparathyroidism(SHPT) is common in hemodialysis(HD) patients. SHPT can damage cardiovascular system , bone system, and so forth. The treatment of SHPT of HD patients includes dietary phosphate restriction, the use of medicines, parathyroidectomy, and microwave ablation, which is a new method booming over the past decade. However, In the mainland of China, medical therapy is not always successful in achieving adequate control of SHPT. Oral medications have limitations as well as side effects. The patients may suffer from the injury of operation, hypoparathyroidism, or recurrence of hyperparathyroidism after parathyroidectomy. Moreover, the fear of operation for patients also limits its development. Thus, microwave ablation may become a valuable alternative treatment to help control SHPT in selected patients presenting with enlarged parathyroid gland(s) visible at ultrasonography. Nevertheless, nowadays there isn't a guideline for doctors to choose when to use microwave ablation to therapy SHPT. Furthermore, different experts have different views. Experts in Japan consider that, for SHPT , the earlier one takes microwave ablation, the better he may be, while others think, Just as parathyroidectomy, microwave ablation is merely used for the patient whose intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) is more than 800pg/ml, or who has serious symptom. From their perspective, this is no proof that accepting microwave ablation for SHPT in early stage becomes better. However, as we all know, as the disease progresses, the therapy becomes increasingly difficult. Since microwave ablation is minimally invasive, safe,the investigators consider, patients who have parathyroid nodular or diffuse hyperplasia demonstrated on ultrasound imaging or radioisotope scan would get more benefit if they undergo microwave ablation the instant that SHPT is diagnosed. So, In this prospective, randomised control and paried clinical trial study, the investigators will observe the efficiency and safety of microwave ablation in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism in early stage. First, the investigators detect the iPTH levels of all the patients in the investigators' blood purification center. The patients whose iPTH are between 300pg/ml and 800pg/ml and who have parathyroid nodular or diffuse hyperplasia demonstrated on ultrasound imaging or radioisotope scan are chosen to involve in this study. The patients with age-matched and iPTH between 300pg/ml and 800pg/ml were enrolled in this study. In the control group, patients will accept vitamin D to treat SHPT, according to the suggestions in K/DOQI guidelines. Meanwhile, in the microwave ablation group, patients will accept microwave ablation. Then, all of the patients will be followed for 24 months to compare the rate of achieving the target on iPTH level according to K/DOQI guidelines, the change of iPTH level after MWA,the rate of subjects developed into severe SHPT, as well as calcium and phosphorus level, Quality of Life and mortality in each group.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Zongli Diao, master
  • Phone Number: +86-01-63138579
  • Email: diaoted@163.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100050
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Friedship Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patients with age between 18-75 years.
  2. patients with parathyroid nodular or diffuse hyperplasia demonstrated on ultrasound imaging or radioisotope scan.
  3. patients in hemodialysis, whose iPTH is between 300pg/ml and 800pg/ml.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. primary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism(hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation).
  2. patient who underwent total parathyroidectomy.
  3. Known history of parathyroid or other neoplasias in the neck region.
  4. History of neck trauma.
  5. major surgery of neck in the last 3 months or in next 4months.
  6. pregnant or lactating woman.
  7. patients with severe liver disease and abnormal blood clotting mechanism.
  8. patients with chronic wasting disease.
  9. patients who is taking glucocorticoids.
  10. patients who have other disorders affecting calcium and phosphorus metabolism.
  11. patients whose concurrent illnesses,disability,or geographical residence would hamper attendance at required study visit.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: microwave ablation group
patients in ultrasonic ablation will be treated by ultrasound guided percutaneous parathyroid gland microwave ablation
Procedure: microwave ablation
First, the investigators detect the iPTH levels of all the patients in the investigators' blood purification center. The patients whose iPTH are between 300pg/ml and 800pg/ml and who have parathyroid nodular or diffuse hyperplasia demonstrated on ultrasound imaging or radioisotope scan are chosen to involve in this study. Patients are divided into 2 groups at random, the control group and the microwave ablation group. In the microwave ablation group, patients will accept microwave ablation. Oral medicines, if needed, will be taken according to the the suggestions in K/DOQI guideline.
Active Comparator: control group
patients in control group will be treated by active vitamin D and other general treatments according to the suggestions in K/DOQI guidelines
Drug: active vitamin D
The control group will be treated by active vitamin D and other general treatment,such as dietary phosphate restriction and phosphate binders,according to the suggestions in K/DOQI guideline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall rate of achieving target for iPTH during the study period.
Time Frame: 12 months
The blood level of intact iPTH will be detected every other month for stable patients.
12 months
The change of iPTH level after MWA.
Time Frame: 12 months
The blood level of intact iPTH will be detected every other month for stable
12 months
The rate of subjects developed into severe SHPT
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Calcitriol weekly dosage.
Time Frame: 12 months
calcification score in every 6 months
12 months
Overall rate of achieving target for serum calcium and phosphorus.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Changes of serum calcium and phosphorus after MWA.
Time Frame: 12 months
The blood level of bone specific alkaline phosphatase will be detected every other months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wenhu Liu

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Zongli Diao, master, Beijing Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BJFH-EC/2014-101

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings