Preventing Loss of Independence Through Exercise (PLIE) in Persons With Dementia (PLIE-VA)

June 4, 2020 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development
Nearly 1 in 10 older Veterans have dementia, which is a devastating condition that leads to a progressive loss of independence and functional status. Currently available dementia medications do not alter the disease course. Therefore, it is critically important to identify effective strategies for helping older Veterans living with dementia to enhance their functional status and quality of life. The investigators have developed a novel, integrative group movement program called Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIE) that incorporates elements from Eastern and Western exercise modalities and is designed to build and maintain the capacity to perform basic functional movements while increasing mindful body awareness and enhancing social connection. Pilot study results suggested that PLIE is associated with meaningful improvements in physical function, cognitive function and quality of life as well as reduced caregiver burden. The goal of the current study is to perform a full-scale randomized, controlled trial to test the efficacy of PLIE in older Veterans with dementia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The goal of the proposed study is to perform a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a novel integrative group movement program called Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIE) on function and quality of life in older Veterans living in the community with dementia. Dementia is a devastating condition that affects nearly 1 in 10 older Veterans (~1 million individuals). Current dementia medications have minimal impact on function and quality of life and do not stop or slow the disease course; however, there is growing evidence that behavioral interventions such as exercise have a variety of beneficial effects in individuals with dementia. PLIE was developed based on recent discoveries in neuroscience and experimental psychology that have found that, although explicit memory (the ability to consciously recall new information) is impaired in individuals with dementia, implicit memory (unconscious learning that typically occurs through repeated exposure) is relatively preserved. Therefore, PLIE focuses on training procedural memory (unconscious learning of procedures) to build the strength and capacity to perform the movements that are most needed for daily function (e.g., transitioning safely from sitting to standing). In addition, to maximize the benefits of the training, PLIE integrates elements of Eastern and Western exercise modalities to develop mindful body awareness and enhance social connection. The investigators completed a pilot study of the PLIE program at an adult day center in San Francisco, CA, finding that it was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in cognitive function, physical performance and quality of life as well as reduced caregiver burden when compared with usual care at the facility. The current study will enable the investigators to build on these pilot study results by performing a full-scale RCT at adult day centers in Northern California. Most VA Medical Centers currently contract with community-based organizations to provide adult day care to eligible Veterans with dementia. Therefore, sites for the current study will be adult day centers that have current contracts with local VA medical centers. Within each center, study participants will be randomly assigned to receive the PLIE intervention program (1 hour, 2-3 days/week, 4 months) or Usual Care (UC) control (standard center activities, 1 hour, 2-3 days/week, 4 months) (N=120, 60/group) using a waitlist design. The co-primary outcomes are 4-month change in physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB), cognitive function (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale, ADAS-cog) and quality of life (Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease, QOL-AD). Changes in caregiver feelings (Caregiver Burden Inventory, CBI; Positive Aspects of Caregiving, PAC), mood (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale, FES), independence (Disability Assessment for Dementia, DAD) and dementia-related behaviors (Neuropsychiatric Inventory, NPI) will be examined as secondary outcomes. To account for the waitlist design, all outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 4 months and 8 months. The proposed project will address a critically important Veterans' health problem related to optimizing functional status and quality of life in older Veterans with dementia. It is directly responsive to Request for Applications (RFA) RX-14-011 (RR&D Merit Review Award for Research on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease), which has identified "pioneering new and innovative rehabilitation methodologies to restore function and improve quality of life for Veterans living with [these] neurodegenerative diseases" as a "major focus." Many patients and caregivers currently feel that little is being done to help individuals with dementia maintain function and quality of life. The current study will utilize rigorous research methods to test the efficacy of an innovative and promising new program for older adults with dementia. If the program is successful, the investigators will work with VA and community-based organizations to implement PLIE more broadly.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
88

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 120 dyads of individuals with dementia and their primary caregivers will be enrolled, with a goal of 20 dyads per intervention site.
  • Veterans with dementia will be prioritized for enrollment at each site.
  • Enrollment will be opened to non-Veterans with dementia at the site if there are not an adequate number of Veterans to fill the group.
  • Caregivers are not required to be Veterans, but their participation is necessary because they are providing care to the primary participants, many of whom will be Veterans.

Inclusion criteria, primary participant:

  • diagnosis of memory loss or dementia
  • mild to moderate severity (defined as Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5, 1 or 2)
  • English language fluency
  • attendance or willingness to attend adult day health center at least 2 days/week on days that PLIE will be offered

Inclusion criteria, caregivers:

  • Provide care for primary participant
  • Able to answer study questionnaires related to participant's functional status, dementia-related behaviors, quality of life and their own burden.
  • English language fluency

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria, primary participant:

  • Plans to change days of attendance during the study period so that participant would no longer be attending on at least 2 PLIE days/week.
  • Planning to leave the facility during the study period and not willing to come for PLIE classes at least 2 days/week
  • Severe vision or hearing impairment (e.g., unable to see or hear well enough to follow instructions)
  • Several physical impairment (e.g., paralysis or hemi-paralysis; wheel-chair or bed bound)
  • Severe mental health condition (e.g., uncontrolled depression, PTSD, bipolar disorder)
  • Limited life expectancy (e.g., enrolled in or eligible for hospice; metastatic cancer)
  • Started dementia medication (cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine) in past 3 months.
  • Planning to change dementia medication during the study period
  • Current participation in another research study
  • Lack of legally authorized representative to provide consent
  • Lack of consent/assent to study procedures

Exclusion criteria, caregivers:

  • Severe vision or hearing impairment (e.g., unable to see or hear well enough to follow instructions)
  • Several physical impairment (e.g., paralysis or hemi-paralysis; wheel-chair or bed bound)
  • Severe mental health condition (e.g,. uncontrolled depression, PTSD, bipolar)
  • Limited life expectancy (e.g., enrolled in or eligible for hospice; metastatic cancer)
  • lack of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Immediate Start
The Immediate Start group will participate in the Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIE) group movement program for 1 hour, 2-3 days/week, for 4 months. After the intervention has been completed, they will be encouraged to maintain PLIE activities on their own for the next 4 months.
Behavioral: Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIE)
PLIE is an integrative group movement program that focuses on training procedural memory for the ability to perform the movements that are most needed for daily function (e.g., transitioning safely between sitting and standing) while increasing mindful body awareness and encouraging social connection. It combines elements from a wide range of Eastern and Western exercise modalities, including occupational therapy, physical therapy, yoga, tai chi, Feldenkrais, Rosen Method, dance movement therapy and mindfulness meditation.
Behavioral: Usual Care
Usual care activities will vary between participants. Some will be attending the adult day center and may be engaging in structured physical, mental and/or social activities. Other participants will be living in the community and may engage in physical, mental, and/or social activities on their own or with a caregiver.
Active Comparator: Delayed Start
Study participants who are randomized to the Delayed Start control group will be placed on a waitlist and will be encouraged to continue participating in their usual activities at the adult day center or in their community setting for 4 months. After the 4-month waitlist period ends, they will participate in the PLIE program for 1 hour, 2-3 days/week, for 4 months.
Behavioral: Preventing Loss of Independence through Exercise (PLIE)
PLIE is an integrative group movement program that focuses on training procedural memory for the ability to perform the movements that are most needed for daily function (e.g., transitioning safely between sitting and standing) while increasing mindful body awareness and encouraging social connection. It combines elements from a wide range of Eastern and Western exercise modalities, including occupational therapy, physical therapy, yoga, tai chi, Feldenkrais, Rosen Method, dance movement therapy and mindfulness meditation.
Behavioral: Usual Care
Usual care activities will vary between participants. Some will be attending the adult day center and may be engaging in structured physical, mental and/or social activities. Other participants will be living in the community and may engage in physical, mental, and/or social activities on their own or with a caregiver.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life Scale in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Quality of Life Scale in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD) is a standard quality of life measure that asks parallel questions of affected individuals and caregivers. Current quality of life is rated as poor (1 point), fair (2 points), good (3 points) or excellent (4 points) in 13 areas: physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores around the house, ability to do things for fun, money, and life as a whole. Scores may range from 13 to 52 with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. Prior studies have found that the QOL-AD is a valid and reliable measure, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.84 for patient reports and 0.86 for caregiver reports and interrater reliability based on Cohen's kappa values >0.70.
4 months
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)-Modified
Time Frame: 4 months
The SPPB was developed by the National Institute on Aging to provide an objective tool for measuring physical performance in older adults. Lower body strength is assessed based on time to complete 5 chair stands without using arms. Balance is assessed based on the ability to hold different stands for 10 seconds, including the side-by-side, semi-tandem and full tandem stands. Mobility is assessed based on usual walking speed over a 3-meter walking course. The total SPPB score is the sum of the 3 component scores and may range from 0 to 12. Higher scores reflect better performance.
4 months
Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures in dementia drug treatment trials and is one of the measures considered by the Food and Drug Administration for approval of dementia medications. It includes direct assessment of learning (10-word list), naming (objects), following commands, constructional praxis (figure copying), ideational praxis (mailing a letter), orientation (person, time, place), recognition memory and remembering test instructions. Scores may range from 0 to 70 with higher scores reflecting worse cognitive function. Prior studies have found the ADAS-cog to be valid and reliable with Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.8 and test-retest reliability above 0.9.
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) is a standard measure that includes 24 items and 5 domains. Caregivers are asked to rate how often each statement describes their feelings (never, rarely, sometimes, quite frequently, nearly always). The total score may range from 0 to 96 with higher scores reflecting greater feelings of burden.
4 months
Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) is a standard measure of functional independence that asks caregivers whether the participant performed 17 basic and 23 instrumental activities of daily living over the past 2 weeks without reminder or assistance. Each item is rated as yes, no, or not applicable (i.e., never performed, no opportunity to perform). The score reflects the percent of items performed independently, excluding those that were not applicable. Therefore, scores may range from 0 to 100 with higher scores reflecting greater independence. The DAD has high established validity and high test-retest reliability (ICC, 0.96), inter-rater reliability (ICC, 0.95) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.96).
4 months
Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Number (NPI-N)
Time Frame: 4 months
The NPI assesses the frequency, severity and level of distress caused by 12 common dementia-related behaviors (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, sleep and appetite/eating). The NPI-N counts the number of symptoms present. Scores may range from 0 to 12 with higher scores reflecting worse outcomes (i.e., more symptoms).
4 months
Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Frequency*Severity (NPI-FS)
Time Frame: 4 months
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Frequency*Severity subscale (NPI-FS) assesses the frequency and severity of 12 common dementia-related behaviors (delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/lability, aberrant motor behavior, sleep and appetite/eating) by caregiver report. NPI-FS was calculated by multiplying the frequency*severity of behaviors, which had a range of 0-144. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater frequency/severity).
4 months
Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Caregiver Distress
Time Frame: 4 months
Measure of caregiver distress associated with 12 common dementia-related behaviors. Scores may range from 0 to 60 with higher scores reflecting greater distress.
4 months
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease - CG Report About Participant
Time Frame: 4 months
Caregiver assessment of participant's quality of life. Scores may range from 13 to 52, with higher scores reflecting better quality of life.
4 months
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
Time Frame: 4 months
Depressive symptoms were assessed in caregivers based on self-report using the GDS - short form, a 15-item yes/no scale. Scores may range from 0 to 15, with higher scores reflecting greater depressive symptomatology.
4 months
Positive Aspects of Caregiving (PAC)
Time Frame: 4 months
A standard measure that asks caregivers to rate their agreement/disagreement with 11 statements about positive aspects of caregiving on a 5-point likert scale (disagree a lot ... agree a lot). Total scores range from 11 to 55 with higher scores indicating more positive feelings
4 months
Chair Stand Time
Time Frame: 4 months
Time to complete 5 chair stands without using arms in seconds. Higher scores reflect worse (slower) performance.
4 months
Balance Score
Time Frame: 4 months
From Short Physical Performance Battery, including side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem balance. Score may range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better balance.
4 months
Usual Gait Speed
Time Frame: 4 months
From Short Physical Performance Battery, better of two times in seconds. Higher scores reflect worse (slower) performance.
4 months
Timed Up & Go
Time Frame: 4 months
Measure of mobility in which participant is timed while standing up from a seated position, walking around a cone that is 8 feet away, and returning to a seated position. Higher scores reflect worse (slower) performance.
4 months
Sit & Reach
Time Frame: 4 months
Measure of flexibility in which participant reaches toward toes with a straight leg. Score reflect closest to touching, with positive values reflecting past toes and negative values reflecting not touching toes.
4 months
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) - Participant Report
Time Frame: 4 months
A standard measure of falls efficacy that can be administered to people with cognitive impairment or caregivers and asks about concern about the possibility of falling doing 10 daily tasks (e.g., taking a bath or shower) on a 4-point likert scale (not at all, somewhat, fairly or very concerned). Scores may range from 10 to 40 with higher scores reflecting worse outcomes (i.e., greater concern about falling).
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
LifeLong Marin Adult Day Health Center
Institute on Aging, San Francisco, CA
Catholic Charities, Santa Rosa, CA
Alzheimer's Services of the East Bay
Bayview Hunters Point Adult Day Health Center
Primrose Alzheimer's Living, Inc

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Deborah E Barnes, PhD, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 4, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 13, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 16, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 4, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D1507-I
  • 5I01RX001507-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings