Glaucoma Management in the African-Derived Developing World Using Trabeculoplasty

June 17, 2021 updated by: Anthony Realini, West Virginia University
This proposal aims to evaluate selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as a safe and effective therapy to control open-angle glaucoma and reduce the risk of progression to visual dysfunction or blindness in the African-derived developing world. If funded, this work will complete the characterization of SLT's safety and efficacy profile as a means of long-term disease control in this population. This work will support the translation of SLT into a structured public health initiative to reduce glaucoma-related vision loss throughout the African-derived developing world.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness in the African-derived developing world and represents a significant public health challenge as the disease burden is substantial. In Ghana, the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma over age 40 is 8.5%. In Barbados, the prevalence is 7.0%. In neighboring St. Lucia, the prevalence has been estimated at 8.8% with a 16% ten-year incidence of glaucoma-related blindness in one or both eyes. (In contrast, the prevalence in US adults is 1.9%.) The burden of glaucoma-related visual dysfunction is also substantial in the developing world. Because the application of medical and surgical therapies is limited by issues such as cost, availability, and limited regional surgical expertise, undertreatment is pervasive. Also, there is little access to low vision or vision rehabilitation services and minimal social support for the visually impaired. Laser trabeculoplasty may be a part of the solution to the developing world's burgeoning glaucoma burden. The treatment is fast, safe, minimally invasive and requires minimal post-treatment care; the equipment is portable; and the incremental cost of trabeculoplasty treatment is small once the equipment and expertise are on-site. Our recent study in St. Lucia demonstrated that laser trabeculoplasty lowers IOP by an amount likely to favorably alter the clinical course of glaucoma (versus no treatment) and has the potential to bend the glaucoma-related blindness curve in the African-derived developing world. Our long-term goal is to translate this finding through a public health initiative by establishing a pan-Caribbean glaucoma laser program to provide safe, effective, and cost-effective therapy for glaucoma in this underserved and overburdened region. Before this can happen, several important research questions remain unanswered regarding SLT in this population and comprise the specific aims of this proposal. What is the long-term efficacy of SLT in this population? Is repeat SLT effective once the IOP reduction of initial SLT wanes? Are the results obtained in St. Lucia generalizable to other developing nations populated by people of African descent? In this application, we propose a prospective cohort study in St. Lucia in which qualifying subjects with open-angle glaucoma will receive bilateral selective laser trabeculoplasty, will be followed to failure of initial SLT, and will undergo repeat SLT and again be followed to failure. The long-term safety and efficacy of both initial and repeat SLT in glaucoma patients of African descent will thus be established. Further, we will replicate the cohort study in Dominica to confirm external validity of the St. Lucia outcomes. This proposal is designed to answer the questions posed above and thus to complete the research phase of this project and facilitate translation of the research findings into the public health space. Considering the population of the African-derived developing world, the prevalence of glaucoma in this population, and the observed preliminary benefits of laser therapy, this project's output could ultimately reduce the risk of glaucoma-related visual dysfunction in hundreds of thousands of individuals throughout the developing world.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
129

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • West Virginia
      • Morgantown, West Virginia, United States, 26505
        • West Virginia University Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Afro-Caribbean ancestry
  • Ages 30 and above
  • Open-angle glaucoma (ISGEO criteria)
  • CDR≥0.7 or CDR asymmetry ≥0.2 or rim width ≤0.1 CDR with typical VF loss; or
  • CDR≥0.8 or CDR asymmetry ≥0.3 (if unable to get VF); or
  • VA <20/400 and IOP ≥ 32 mmHg (if unable to get VF or CDR)
  • Receiving ≤2 topical IOP-lowering medications
  • IOP between 17-35 mmHg in both eyes after 30-day washout

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any glaucoma other than open-angle glaucoma
  • Advanced glaucoma (CDR > 0.9 or field loss in central 10º)
  • History of:
  • Prior glaucoma laser or surgery
  • Ocular inflammation within 3 months
  • Ocular trauma or intraocular surgery within 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment Cohort
All subjects will receive bilateral 360 degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty therapy in a single session, but will be randomized to one of three treatment sessions at times 0, Month 3 and Month 6. Subjects will be washed out of current IOP-lowering therapy 4-6 weeks pre-SLT. Subjects continuing on meds beyond time 0 will provide a comparator to early SLT to quantify regression to the mean.
Procedure: Selective laser trabeculoplasty
laser therapy to trabecular outflow pathway of the eye to lower intraocular pressure, delivered to 360 degrees of both eyes in a single session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probability of 12-month success (Proportion of subjects with 20% or greater IOP reduction 12 months following SLT)
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of subjects with 20% or greater IOP reduction 12 months following SLT
12 months
Repeat probability of 12-month success (Proportion of subjects with 20% or greater IOP reduction from baseline 12 months after repeat SLT)
Time Frame: 12 months after as-needed repeat SLT
12 months after as-needed repeat SLT
Generalizability of IOP-lowering efficacy to populations other than St. Lucia (significance of a site term in a predictive model of IOP reduction)
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluate significance of a site term in a predictive model of IOP reduction following SLT to determine if response to IOP is site dependent
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median survival time following initial SLT (Time from initial SLT to when 50% of subjects no longer manifest a 20% or greater reduction in IOP from baseline)
Time Frame: Through up to five years of follow-up
Time from initial SLT to when 50% of subjects no longer manifest a 20% or greater reduction in IOP from baseline
Through up to five years of follow-up
Mean IOP reduction (Descriptive analysis of mean (+/- SD) IOP reductions from baseline)
Time Frame: through up to five years of follow-up
Descriptive analysis of mean (+/- SD) IOP reductions from baseline at each 12-month period following initial and repeat SLT, separately
through up to five years of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
West Virginia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tony Realini, MD, MPH, West Virginia University Eye Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1411505682

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings