Dry Needling for Spasticity in Stroke

April 5, 2015 updated by: César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Changes in Spasticity, Range of Motion and Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Stroke After the Application of Dry Needling in the Shoulder Musculature

Stroke is the leading cause of physical disability due to the presence of spasticity. Different needling techniques, including Botulinum Toxin A are proposed for management of spasticity; however results are conflicting. The presence of spasticity in the upper extremity implies several impairments for daily life activities. No study has investigated the effects of deep dry needling inserted into the targeted spastic musculature of the shoulder region in patients who had suffered a stroke. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial investigating the effects of the inclusion of deep dry needling into a rehabilitation program over the musculature of the shoulder region, pressure pain hyperalgesia and range of motion in individuals with chronic stroke. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving dry needling into the spastic shoulder musculature would exhibit greater improvements in spasticity, pressure sensitivity and range of motion than those who will not receive the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Beta María Ana
    • Madrid
      • Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain, 28922
        • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first-ever unilateral stroke;
  • hemiplegia resulting from stroke;
  • age between 40 and 65 years old;
  • presence of hypertonicity in the upper extremity;
  • restricted range of motion of the shoulder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recurrent stroke;
  • previous treatment with nerve blocks, motor point injections with neurolytic agents for spasticity at any time;
  • previous treatment with BTX-A in the 6 months prior the study;
  • severe cognitive deficits; 5, progressive or severe neurologic diseases, e.g., heart conditions, unstable hypertension, fracture or implants in the lower extremity;
  • fear to needles;
  • any contraindication for deep dry needling, e.g., anticoagulants, infections, bleeding, or psychotic.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental intervention
The experimental intervention will consist of 3 sessions, one per week, of 45min of physical therapy including mobilizations of the scapular region, manual therapies targeted to decrease muscle tone, neuromodulatory techniques for spasticity and proprioceptive exercises for the upper extremity. In addition, during this intervention patients will also receive deep dry needling with disposable stainless steel needles (0.3mm x 50mm) that will be inserted into the skin over taut bands of the spastic musculature of the shoulder area: upper trapezius, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and pectoralis mayor
Other: Dry needling
Patients will receive deep dry needling with disposable stainless steel needles (0.3mm x 50mm) that will be inserted into the skin over taut bands of the spastic musculature of the shoulder area: upper trapezius, subscapularis, infraspinatus, and pect
Other: Physical Therapy
Patients will receive 3 sessions, one per week, of 45min of physical therapy including mobilizations of the scapular region, manual therapies targeted to decrease muscle tone, neuromodulatory techniques for spasticity and proprioceptive exercises for the upper extremity
Device: stainless steel needles (0.3mm x 50mm)
Active Comparator: Control intervention
The control intervention will consist of 3 sessions, one per week, of 45min of physical therapy including mobilizations of the scapular region, manual therapies targeted to decrease muscle tone, neuromodulatory techniques for spasticity and proprioceptive exercises for the upper extremity.
Other: Physical Therapy
Patients will receive 3 sessions, one per week, of 45min of physical therapy including mobilizations of the scapular region, manual therapies targeted to decrease muscle tone, neuromodulatory techniques for spasticity and proprioceptive exercises for the upper extremity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in spasticity before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline and immediate after the interventionBaseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention
Spasticity in the affected ankle joint will be evaluated with the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS). The examiner passively moved the upper extremity in a stretching direction of each muscle (shoulder depression, shoulder external rotation, shoulder internal rotation, and shoulder abduction 90º combined with external rotation, respectively), back and forth at least 5 times and evaluated the degree of resistance to the movement on a scale from 0-4
Baseline and immediate after the interventionBaseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pressure pain sensitivity before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention
Pressure pain thresholds, defined as the amount of pressure applied for the pressure sensation to first change to pain, will be assessed with a mechanical pressure algometer (Pain Diagnosis and Treatment Inc, New York, USA) unilaterally over the affected infraspinatus and deltoid muscles and bilaterally over the C5/C6 zygapophyseal joint.
Baseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention
Changes in shoulder mobility before and after the intervention
Time Frame: Baseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention
A universal goniometer will be used to determine the participant's shoulder range of motion in flexion, abduction and external rotation
Baseline (1 week before) and 1 week after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 5, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HBMA-URJC

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings