Iron Supplement to Improve Iron Status Following Bariatric Surgery

August 3, 2022 updated by: Nana Gletsu Miller, Indiana University

Comparison of Iron Supplement Formulations to Improve Iron Status Following Roux-en-Y and Sleeve Gastrectomy Bariatric Surgery

There is a high prevalence of iron deficiency in patients who undergo bariatric surgery and effective therapies are lacking. Thus, there is a critical need for an effective, non-invasive, and inexpensive form of iron supplementation to treat iron deficiency and improve tolerance, the associated cognitive symptoms, and quality of life in the bariatric surgery patient population. Often, patients do not participate in bariatric programs, are not compliant, and/or are lost to follow-up. If there is a more effective and evidence-based guideline for repletion of iron deficiency, patients are more likely to be compliant. Therefore, in a randomized controlled study, the investigators propose to test the effectiveness of various iron formulations versus ferrous sulfate, which is the standard of care, for oral iron supplementation of iron deficient patients who have had RYGB or SG bariatric surgery. By randomizing patients into the two groups, the investigators will be able to determine the most effective regimen to improve blood biomarkers of iron status, cognitive function, and quality of life. Other outcomes will include adverse effects and compliance to the supplementation. The investigators will also analyze three-day food records to determine the contribution of dietary factors to changes in iron status. To test for improvement of iron status, serial blood draws will be performed during a time period of ~10 weeks. Serial blood draws from iron deficient patients have routinely been performed in past studies and have not been found to be harmful. Because this is a relatively short study (10 weeks), subjects will be able to recover quickly from the blood loss during the study. The investigators expect to find that iron supplementation with organic formulations of iron will be as effective than ferrous sulfate for repletion of iron deficiency, and they will be better tolerated. This project will address a significant health issue in individuals who have had bariatric surgery, which is a growing population in the United States. It is estimated that almost 1.5 million individuals have undergone bariatric surgery since the year 1990.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Objectives:

  1. To determine the most effective oral iron supplementation regimen for repletion of iron deficiency in patients who have had gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. In iron deficient patients, two supplement regimens will be compared:

    1. Ferrous sulfate 65 mg t.i.d. (standard of care / control), which is elemental iron
    2. AspironTM, which is an organic formulation of iron

    Primary outcomes will be reference indices of iron status:

    • Ferritin, TIBC, sTfR, and sTfR:ferritin ratio
    • Secondary outcomes will be:
    • measures of anemia, determined by blood hemoglobin concentrations
    • measures of cognitive function via several computerized tests on working memory, sustained attention, and spatial memory
    • fatigue by Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory questionnaire
    • Quality of life by SF-36 Survey

    Safety outcomes will be:

    • adverse events, compliance, measures of iron toxicity, and liver enzymes

  2. In the same subjects undergoing iron supplementation described in Aim 1, to determine the contribution of dietary factors (including heme and non-heme iron intake, and intake of enhancers and inhibitors of iron absorption) to changes in iron status.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Indiana
      • West Lafayette, Indiana, United States, 47906
        • Purdue University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a history of RYGB or SG weight loss surgery at least 6 months ago
  • Subject meets at least 2 of the 4 previously mentioned conditions classifying them as iron deficient
  • Subject is female
  • Subject is at least 18 but not more than 65 years of age (post-menopausal status is an exclusion criteria)
  • Subject has signed an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is pregnant
  • Subject has history of surgical revision or conversion of bariatric procedure
  • Subject is under a treatment regimen that requires iron supplementation greater than standard of care
  • Subject has had parenteral iron less than one month before screening visit
  • Subject has extremely heavy menstruation
  • Subject has a history of hospitalization for acute illness in the previous 3 months
  • Subject has current active malignant neoplasm; or history of malignancy other than localized basal cell cancer of skin during previous 5 years
  • Subject has gastrointestinal disease that involve increased inflammation or blood loss (e.g. Crohn's disease, Ulcerative colitis)
  • Subject is post-menopausal
  • Subject has severe anemia, with a hemoglobin > 7.0 g/dL (subjects will be notified of their results)
  • Subject is taking an erythropoietin stimulating medication or is on hemodialysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ferrous sulfate
Ferrous sulfate 65 mg. t.i.d is the standard of care for oral supplementation for iron deficiency
Dietary supplement: Oral iron supplementation
Participants will be provided supplementation for 8 weeks
Experimental: AspironTM 65 mg t.i.d.
AspironTM, an organic formulation of iron, is the experimental treatment for oral supplementation of iron deficiency
Dietary supplement: Oral iron supplementation
Participants will be provided supplementation for 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Iron status
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Ferritin, TIBC, sTfR
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Anemia assessed by Hemoglobin concentrations
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Safety outcomes assessed by adverse events, compliance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB1410015305

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Study Data/Documents

  1. Website

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anemia, Iron Deficiency

Clinical Trials on Oral iron supplementation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings