Gonadotropin Type in Ovarian Stimulation

May 4, 2015 updated by: Antonio Requena, IVI Madrid

Type of Gonadotropin During Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Affects the Endocrine Profile in Follicular Fluid and Apoptotic Rate in Granulose Cells

A key challenge facing reproductive biologists is the integration of the knowledge about oocyte-secreted factors into coherent physiological mechanisms of how oocytes govern folliculogenesis, cumulus cell function, and oocyte and embryo development. Although key oocyte-secreted factors have been identified, understanding their modes of action is complicated by multiple interactions between maternal and oocyte signaling molecules, as well as the constantly changing state of physical interactions between the oocyte and its companion somatic cells during folliculogenesis. Thus, the investigators study aimed to determine if there is any relationship between different gonadotropin preparations and oocyte-secreted factor secretion, the endocrine pattern in follicular fluid, and the apoptotic rate in cumulus cells during controlled ovarian stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The follicular environment is primarily influenced by the type of gonadotropin the follicle is exposed to during the follicular phase. The role of gonadotropins has been especially important in improving the efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Several studies comparing the use of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) have found significant differences in the endocrinological profile and the follicular dynamics. These differences have been related to the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-driven luteinizing hormone (LH) activity added to hMG. Moreover, differences in the proportion of acid residues in FSH molecules should be considered.

On the other hand, the main physiological regulatory hormones of follicular survival are the gonadotropins. Suppression of serum gonadotropins leads to massive apoptosis of granulosa cells in developing follicles resulting in atresia; whereas, gonadotropin treatment of early antral and pre-ovulatory follicles prevents this unplanned apoptosis. However, studies using cultured rat granulosa cells have shown that treatments with FSH or LH/hCG are ineffective in preventing spontaneous apoptosis, suggesting neighboring theca cells and local factors produced in the ovary are important for regulation of follicle growth and atresia.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-35 years old
  • regular menstrual cycles
  • no hereditary or chromosomal diseases normal karyotype negative for sexually transmitted diseases
  • at least seven antral follicles per ovary

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PCO

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group 1: recombinant FSH
An oral contraceptive pill (Microgynon30®, Bayer Hispania, Spain) was taken for a maximum of 21 days, starting on day 1-2 of the menses of the previous cycle. After a wash-period of five days after the last pill, donors started to receive daily doses of 150-300 UI of rFSH (Gonal-F®, Merck-Serono, Spain; n=30) depending on their age, body mass index (BMI) and ovarian response in previous cycles. Daily doses of 0.25 mg gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide®, Merck-Serono, Spain) were started on day six of stimulation in each group. When at least three or more leading follicles reached a mean diameter of ≥18 mm, hCG (Ovitrelle®, 250 µg; Merck-Serono, Spain) was administered subcutaneously
Drug: recombinant FSH
Controlled ovarian stimulation with 150-300 UI recombinant FSH
Other Names:
  • Gonal-F
Active Comparator: Group 2:urinary FSH
An oral contraceptive pill (Microgynon30®, Bayer Hispania, Spain) was taken for a maximum of 21 days, starting on day 1-2 of the menses of the previous cycle. After a wash-period of five days after the last pill, donors started to receive daily doses of 150-300 UI of urinary FSH (uFSH) (Fostipur®, Angelini, Spain; n=30) depending on their age, body mass index (BMI) and ovarian response in previous cycles. Daily doses of 0.25 mg gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide®, Merck-Serono, Spain) were started on day six of stimulation in each group. When at least three or more leading follicles reached a mean diameter of ≥18 mm, hCG (Ovitrelle®, 250 µg; Merck-Serono, Spain) was administered subcutaneously.
Drug: Urinary FSH
Controlled ovarian stimulation with 150-300 UI urinary FSH
Other Names:
  • Fostipur
Active Comparator: Group 3: with hMG
An oral contraceptive pill (Microgynon30®, Bayer Hispania, Spain) was taken for a maximum of 21 days, starting on day 1-2 of the menses of the previous cycle. After a wash-period of five days after the last pill, donors started to receive daily doses of 150-300 UI of hMG (HMG-Lepori®, Angelini, Spain; n=30) depending on their age, body mass index (BMI) and ovarian response in previous cycles. Daily doses of 0.25 mg gonadotropin- releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide®, Merck-Serono, Spain) were started on day six of stimulation in each group. When at least three or more leading follicles reached a mean diameter of ≥18 mm, hCG (Ovitrelle®, 250 µg; Merck-Serono, Spain) was administered subcutaneously, and transvaginal oocyte retrieval was performed 36 h later.
Drug: hMG
Controlled ovarian stimulation with 150-300 UI hMG
Other Names:
  • hMG-Lepori

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
GDF-9 and BMP-15 secretion
Time Frame: 3 years
To measure GDF-9 (ng/ml) and BMP-15 (micrograms/microliter)
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Steroids levels in follicular fluid (estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, FSH)
Time Frame: 3 years
To measure estradiol (pg/ml), progesterone (ng/ml), FSH (mUI/ml) and testosterone (ng/ml)
3 years
Apoptotic rate in cumulus cells
Time Frame: 3 years
To measure early and late apoptotic rate (%)
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IVI Madrid

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Requena, PhD, MD, IVI Madrid

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 7, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MAD-GV-04-2009-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on recombinant FSH

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings