The Effect of Liraglutide on Bone Turnover, Bone Mass and Bone Cell Function (LIRABONE)

September 25, 2018 updated by: University of Aarhus
The purpose of this study is to test whether liraglutide, a drug approved and widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, has an effect on bone mass and bone cell function. Type 2 diabetes may cause multiple complications, and it is well known that patients with type 2 diabetes have a higher risk of fractures. If Liraglutide can be demonstrated to have a positive effect on bone, this may be one among other factors to consider before the decision about specific treatment of type 2 diabetes is made for the individual patient.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background: Type 2 diabetes may cause complications such as ischemic heart disease, nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy. Several epidemiologic and animal studies also suggest that fracture risk is increased in diabetes.

Bone is remodelled throughout life through bone resorption by the bone resorbing cells, the osteoclasts, and by bone formation by the bone forming cells, the osteoblasts. Bone remodelling can be monitored by biochemical markers of bone turnover and the effect of bone remodelling can be measured by changes in bone mineral density (BMD) by Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or bone structure by quantitative CT (QCT) or high resolution peripheral QCT (HRpQCT). The remodelling activity and the balance between resorption and formation are influenced by many factors including food consumption. The gut hormone glucagon-like polypeptide 1 (GLP-1) is released in relation to food intake and reduces serum levels of glucagon, increases serum levels of insulin, and reduces blood glucose in diabetes. Liraglutide is a GLP-1 analogue and has been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Aim: To investigate the effect of the GLP-1 analogue Liraglutide on bone turnover, bone mass, and bone structure in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: The clinical study will be conducted as a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective, clinical trial with comparative treatment regimes with either subcutaneous Liraglutide or subcutaneous placebo injections.

Perspectives: The project will bring new knowledge about the possible effects of GLP-1 analogues on bone turnover and structure. This is important given that type 2 diabetes deteriorates bone health and increases risk of fractures. If Liraglutide can be demonstrated to have a positive effect on bone, this may be one among other factors to consider before the decision about specific treatment of type 2 diabetes is made for the individual patient.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
    • Aarhus C
      • Aarhus, Aarhus C, Denmark, 8000
        • Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > 48 mmol/mol)
  • Age older than 30 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Treatment with insulin
  • Body weight > 140 kg
  • HbA1c > 75 mmol/mol
  • Treatment with GLP-1 analogues, Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, or glitazones
  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Pancreatitis
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Osteoporosis
  • Family or personal history of medullary thyroid carcinoma
  • Treatment with glucocorticoids
  • Hormone replacement therapy
  • Diabetic gastroparesis
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Liraglutide
Liraglutide ("Victoza"), subcutaneous 1,8 mg once daily for 180 days
Drug: Liraglutide
Once daily
Other Names:
  • Victoza
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Saline, subcutaneous once daily for 180 days
Drug: Placebo
Once daily
Other Names:
  • Saline

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in collagen I cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide measured in serum
Time Frame: Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Collagen I cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide has been chosen as primary endpoint as the expected mechanism of action is reduction in bone resorption, and as it is the most responsive bone resorption marker.
Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in bone alkaline phosphatase measured in serum
Time Frame: Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Change in BMD evaluated by DXA
Time Frame: Days 0, 90, 180
Days 0, 90, 180
Change in bone structure evaluated by QCT and HRpQCT
Time Frame: Days 0, 90, 180
Days 0, 90, 180
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: Days 0, 180
Days 0, 180
Change in osteocalcin measured in serum
Time Frame: Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Change in procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide measured in serum
Time Frame: Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180
Days 0, 7, 28, 90, 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Aarhus

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Novo Nordisk A/S
Aarhus University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Bente L Langdahl, MD PhD DMSc, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 07052015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Complications

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings