EMD and/or Bone Substitute for the Treatment of Class II Furcations

January 30, 2017 updated by: Enilson Antonio Sallum, University of Campinas, Brazil

Enamel Matrix Protein Derivative and/or Synthetic Bone Substitute for the Treatment of Mandibular Class II Buccal Furcation Defects. A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial

To clinically evaluate the treatment of mandibular class II furcation defects with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and/or a bone substitute graft make of beta tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (βTCP/HA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To clinically evaluate the treatment of mandibular class II furcation defects with enamel matrix derivative (EMD) and/or a bone substitute graft make of beta tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (βTCP/HA). Forty-one patients, presenting a mandibular class II buccal furcation defect, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥ 4 mm and bleeding on probing, will be included. They will be randomly assigned to the groups: 1- EMD (n = 13); 2- βTCP/HA (n = 14); 3- EMD + βTCP/HA (n = 14). Relative gingival margin position (RGMP), relative vertical and horizontal attachment level (RVCAL and RHCAL) and PPD will be evaluated at baseline and 12 months. The mean horizontal clinical attachment level gain will be considered the primary outcome variable.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • São Paulo
      • Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, 13414-903
        • Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females, between 18-75 years of age;
  • Presence of a mandibular molar with buccal class-II furcation defect, presenting PD ≥ 4mm, bleeding on probing (BOP), minimum (<1 mm) or no gingival recession after non-surgical therapy;
  • Good general health;
  • Minimum interproximal bone loss (< 2 mm).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating;
  • Required antibiotic pre-medication for the performance of periodontal examination and treatment;
  • Suffered from any other systemic diseases (cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver, cerebral, diseases or diabetes);
  • Had received antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months;
  • Were taking long-term anti-inflammatory drugs;
  • Had received a course of periodontal treatment within the last 6 months;
  • Smokers.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: EMD alone
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation defects in this group will receive the application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD - Emdogain® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) and after the flap will be repositioned.
Drug: EMD
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation defects in this group will receive the application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD - Emdogain® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland).
Other Names:
  • Emdogain
Procedure: Flap access surgery
In the furcation sites, during flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments.
Active Comparator: βTCP/HA alone
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation will be filled with a bone substitute consisting of beta tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (βTCP/HA- Bone Ceramic® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland)
Procedure: Flap access surgery
In the furcation sites, during flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments.
Device: βTCP/HA
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces were carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation will be filled with a bone substitute consisting of beta tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (βTCP/HA- Bone Ceramic® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland)
Other Names:
  • Bone Ceramic®
Active Comparator: EMD + βTCP/HA
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation will be filled with a mixture of enamel matrix derivative proteins (EMD) (Emdogain® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) and bone substitute consisting of βTCP/HA (Bone Ceramic® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland). Immediately after debridement, EMD will be applied on the root surfaces. The remaining part of the material in the seringe will be then mixed with the bone substitute on a sterile dappen. This mixture will be used to completely fill the defect (EMD + βTCP/HA).
Drug: EMD
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation defects in this group will receive the application of enamel matrix derivative (EMD - Emdogain® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland).
Other Names:
  • Emdogain
Procedure: Flap access surgery
In the furcation sites, during flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces will be carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments.
Device: βTCP/HA
During flap access surgery, the granulation tissue will be removed and the root surfaces were carefully instrumented with ultrasonic and hand instruments. The furcation will be filled with a bone substitute consisting of beta tricalcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite (βTCP/HA- Bone Ceramic® Straumann, Basel, Switzerland)
Other Names:
  • Bone Ceramic®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Horizontal Clinical Attachment Level (RHCAL) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
The relative horizontal clinical attachment level (RHCAL) will be measured with the same type of probe (PCP-15 Periodontal Probe - Hu-Friedy - Chicago, IL, USA) as the distance between the deepest point reached by the probe when introduced horizontally into the furcation and the lower border of the stent. This parameter will be evaluated at one specific site at the buccal furcation entrance, determined by a groove made on an individually manufactured acrylic stent and recorded to the nearest 0.5mm.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relative Vertical Clinical Attachment Level (RVCAL) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
The relative vertical clinical attachment level (RVCAL) will be measured with the same type of probe (PCP-15 Periodontal Probe - Hu-Friedy - Chicago, IL, USA) as the distance between the deepest point reached by the probe when introduced vertically into the buccal periodontal pocket. This parameter will be evaluated at one specific site at the buccal furcation entrance, determined by a groove made on an individually manufactured acrylic stent and recorded to the nearest 0.5mm.
12 months
Periodontal Probing Depth at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Relative Gingival Margin Position (RGMP) at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Campinas, Brazil

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 035/2007

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings