Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization Trial (FARGO)

October 16, 2018 updated by: Anne Langhoff Thuesen, Odense University Hospital
The FARGO trial is a prospective, randomized (1:1), multicenter study. The aim of the study is to assess the importance of fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with respect to planning and guiding the revascularization strategy. The study compares an FFR-guided strategy to an angiography-guided strategy in patients planned for surgical revascularization.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

FFR measurements are made on all patients that enters the study. FFR measurements on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting, are done before CABG is performed. Patients are randomized to either an FFR-guided CABG or an Angiography guided CABG.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9100
        • Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
    • Aarhus N
      • Aarhus, Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Department of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby Sygehus
    • Odense C
      • Odense, Odense C, Denmark, 5000
        • Anne Langhoff Thuesen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stable angina or unstable angina / NSTEMI (Non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) candidate to CABG
  • At least one study lesion, which is an intermediate lesion planned for grafting at the Heart Team Meeting.(Definition of Study lesions: ≥ 50% stenosis of a major epicardiel artery (where the proximal reference segment has a diameter> 2.5 mm), which can be passed with a FFR-wire without significant risk. Study Lesions can be drawn from all coronary arteries.)
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant valvular disease with indication to surgical treatment
  • Previous open-heart-surgery
  • Left main lesion without other intermediate lesions
  • Treatment with Persantin Retard
  • One vessel disease
  • Renal impairment (creatinine ≥ 150 umol / l)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fractional flow reserve-guided CABG
Patients are randomized to an FFR-guided CABG. FFR-measurements are made on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting. The FFR-values are blinded for both the operator, the patient and the heart team meeting. The graft plan form the heart team meeting are changed by the study investigator according to the FFR-measurements and randomization, so that coronary arteries with FFR ≤ 0,8 receive grafting and coronary arteries with FFR > 0,8 are deferred.
Procedure: Fractional flow reserve-guided CABG
Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting and where FFR-measurements are made, only receive grafting if FFR-value is ≤ 0,8. Arteries with FFR-values > 0,8 are deferred.
Active Comparator: Angiography-guided CABG
Patients are randomized to an angiography-guided CABG. FFR-measurements are made on coronary arteries with intermediate stenoses, that are planned for grafting. The FFR-values are blinded for both the operator, the patient and the heart team meeting. The graft plan are based on the coronary angiography.
Procedure: Angiography-guided CABG
Coronary arteries with angiographical significant stenoses, that are planned for grafting at the heart team meeting all receive grafting. FFR-measurements are still made, but not used for guidance of grafting.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage open grafts of all grafts
Time Frame: 6 months
Open graft definition: graft with TIMI III flow with no anastomosis stenosis (TIMI flow grades based on results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Graft stenosis (shaft and anastomoses)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Change in CCS class from index to follow-up (FU)
Time Frame: 6 months
CCS class (Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of angina)
6 months
Change in Quality of life (EQ-5D) from index to FU
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular event: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, new revascularization by CABG or PCI (Percutaneous coronary intervention)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Procedural maximum Troponin I (cTnI), Troponin T (TnT) or creatinine kinase MB (CKMB) values depending on local conditions.
Time Frame: The first 24 hours after the operation
The first 24 hours after the operation
Procedure time
Time Frame: During surgery (minutes)
During surgery (minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Odense University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anne Langhoff Thuesen, MD, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Odense University Hospital
  • Study Director: Lisette Okkels Jensen, MD,PhD,DMSc, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Per Thayssen, MD, DMSc, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
  • Study Chair: Poul Erik Mortensen, MD, Department of Cardio-thoracic surgery, Odense University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S-20130050

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Fractional flow reserve-guided CABG

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings