The Use of an Open Label Placebo to Treat Cancer Related Fatigue in Cancer Survivors (OLPI)

September 22, 2021 updated by: Theresa W. Hoenemeyer, University of Alabama at Birmingham
The purpose of this randomized-controlled, crossover pilot trial is to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effects of a non-deceptive (open-label) administration of placebo pills for treating cancer related fatigue (CRF). If significant effects are found, the investigators will later determine if the presence of a COMT Val18Met genotype variant predicts placebo responses.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators will conduct a pilot randomized-controlled, crossover trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and effect of the open-label administration of placebo pills on CRF and associated psychosocial factors (e.g., emotional health, social health, quality of life, etc.) for cancer survivors (CSs) who have completed all cancer treatments yet continue to experience CRF. Additionally, in an exploratory manner, the investigators will collect DNA saliva specimens that will be analyzed for potential biomarkers that may predict placebo responses. To do this, investigators will use a 7-week, single site, two-parallel arm, randomized controlled crossover pilot study to determine the feasibility, acceptability and effects of an Open Label Placebo Intervention (OLPI) on CSs who completed cancer treatments at least 6 months prior to enrollment in the study and report a fatigue score of 4 or greater on a 0-10 scale. Investigators will enroll 80 eligible CS participants who will be randomized into two groups of 40 (Group1 and Group2 ). In this crossover study, participants in Group1, will receive an OLP (placebo pill) for 21-days (Period 1)and Group2 (Observational Controls) will not. After a 1-week washout period, Group2 will receive the OLP for 21-days (Period 2) and Group1 (Observational Controls) will not.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
74

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of Stage II - IV cancer;
  • Completed primary treatment 6months to 10 years;
  • Report ≥4 (moderate fatigue) on a 0-10 fatigue severity rating scale;
  • Agree not to change any medications or treatments during the study;
  • Willingness to make 4 clinical site visits over the course of the 49-day study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stage 1 cancer;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes;
  • Uncontrolled COPD;
  • Uncontrolled ischemic heart disease;
  • Uncontrolled liver/kidney diseases;
  • Uncontrolled autoimmune diseases;
  • Uncontrolled psychiatric or cognitive diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 1a
During the first 3-week period of the study, Group 1 will serve as the experimental arm and will receive the open-label placebo intervention. Group 1 participants will take 2 placebos in the morning and 2 placebos in the evening for 21 days.
Behavioral: Open-label placebo intervention
An open-label placebo intervention is an administered placebo that is fully disclosed to participants. It is delivered with a script that tells participants they are receiving placebos; placebos have been found to have effects that are comparable to some clinical treatments; placebos work because of conditioning, expectancies, interactions with care team and biochemical factors (i.e., dopamine, endorphins). Participants are given placebos to take for a 3-week period and will not receive placebos for a 4-week period (including a one-week washout period).
Other Names:
  • OLPI
NO_INTERVENTION: Group 2a
During the first 3-week period of the study, Group 2 will serve as the comparator arm.
NO_INTERVENTION: Group 1b
During the last 3-week period of the study, Group 1 will serve as the comparator arm.
EXPERIMENTAL: Group 2b
During the last 3-week period of the study, Group 2 will serve as the experimental arm and will receive the open-label placebo intervention.Group 2 participants will take 2 placebos in the morning and 2 placebos in the evening for 21 days.
Behavioral: Open-label placebo intervention
An open-label placebo intervention is an administered placebo that is fully disclosed to participants. It is delivered with a script that tells participants they are receiving placebos; placebos have been found to have effects that are comparable to some clinical treatments; placebos work because of conditioning, expectancies, interactions with care team and biochemical factors (i.e., dopamine, endorphins). Participants are given placebos to take for a 3-week period and will not receive placebos for a 4-week period (including a one-week washout period).
Other Names:
  • OLPI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment Rate
Time Frame: End of Study (7 weeks)
Unit of measure: number of enrollees / number of eligible participants as a measure of feasibility.
End of Study (7 weeks)
Accrual Rate as a Measure of Feasibility
Time Frame: End of Study (7 weeks)
Unit of measure: number of accrued participants / recruitment goal (80); odds ration of expected time-to-first participant/ actual time-to-first patient enrollment.
End of Study (7 weeks)
Adherence Rate as a Measure of Feasibility
Time Frame: End of Study (7 weeks)
Unit of measure: number of placebos taken / number prescribed (84)
End of Study (7 weeks)
Eligibility as a measure of Feasibility
Time Frame: End of Study (7 weeks)
Unit of measure: number eligible for enrollment / number screened
End of Study (7 weeks)
Retention as a measure of Acceptability
Time Frame: End of Study (7 weeks)
Unit of measure: number retained in study / number enrolled (goal = 75% of enrolled
End of Study (7 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of fatigue manifestation
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Units of measure: units on a scale using the Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form (MFSI-SF) instrument. 30-questions measure the global, somatic, affective, behavioral and cognitive manifestations of fatigue. Scale for items = 0 (not at all) - 4 (extremely)
Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Measurement of impact of fatigue on quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Unit of measure: units on a scale using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (MOS-36) instrument. The 36-item instrument measures the impact of fatigue on vitality, physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning and mental health. Scale for items = 1 (limited a lot) - 3 (Not limited at all)
Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Measurement of the impact of fatigue on physical function
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Unit of measure: units on a scale using the FACT-Fatigue instrument; scale for impact is 0 = not at all; 10 = very much.
Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Measurement of fatigue severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks
Units of measure: units on a scale using the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) instrument. Scale = 0 (no fatigue / no interference) to 10 (extreme fatigue / interference)
Baseline, 3 weeks, 4 weeks and 7 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test for the presence of a COMT Val158Met/Val or Val/Val variant gene
Time Frame: Baseline
Investigators will collect and store saliva samples so, should significant OLPI effects be obtained, we can evaluate whether a potential biomarker (COMT Val158Met variant) associates with placebo responsiveness.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 14, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • X150506002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings