"All Comers" Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) With Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes (LOCOMOTIVE)

October 9, 2018 updated by: B. Braun Melsungen AG

"All Comers" Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) With Multi-LOC for flOw liMiting Outcomes After Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) and/or Drug Coated Balloon (DCB) Treatment in the Infra-inguinal Position With the objectiVE to Implant Multiple Stent Segments

The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Multi-LOC® peripheral stent system to treat de novo and restenotic lesions (no in-stent restenosis (ISR), no restenosis post drug coated balloon (DCB) after flow limiting plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and/or DCB dilatations in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal segments (P1, P2 & P3)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is an non-randomized, prospective, multi-center, non-interventional study (registry, for Germany: §23b MPG)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Diakonissenkrankenhaus Mannheim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The aim of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Multi-LOC® peripheral stent system to treat de novo and restenotic lesions (no in-stent restenosis (ISR), no restenosis post drug coated balloon (DCB)) after flow limiting plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and/or DCB dilatations in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal segments (P1, P2 & P3)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to treat flow-limiting dissections/recoil after plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)/drug coated balloon (DCB) interventions
  • Patients in Rutherford classes 2 through 5
  • Patients eligible for peripheral revascularization by means of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting
  • Patients must be at least 18 years of age
  • Patient with a life expectance of at least 12 months
  • Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the study and to show sufficient compliance in the following study protocol
  • Patients must agree to undergo at least the 6-month clinical follow-up
  • Patient is able to verbally acknowledge an understanding of the associated risks, benefits, and treatment alternatives to therapeutic options of this trial, e.g. balloon angioplasty by means of other suitable stent devices. Patients, by providing their informed consent, agree to these risks and benefits as stated in the patient informed consent document.
  • Lesions with unsatisfying angiographic results due to recoil and/or dissections after POBA/DCB interventions
  • Infra-inguinal lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal segments (P1,P2 & P3) reference vessel diameters between 4 and 7.0 mm, lesion length suitable for the release of at least 2 Stent (up to 6) segments implanted with a minimum inter-stent distance of 1 cm
  • Diameter stenosis pre-procedure must be larger or equal to 70%
  • Vessels must have adequate distal run-off with at least one vessel to the foot or with collaterals in the calf supplying sufficient flow to the foot.

(Lesions separated by less than 2 cm are considered as one lesion)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient not suitable for revascularization by interventional means

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 6 months
target lesion revascularization surgical & interventional
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain free walking distance
Time Frame: < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
pain free walking distance
< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
maximum walking distance
Time Frame: < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
maximum walking distance
< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
target lesion revascularization
Time Frame: 12 months
target lesion revascularization
12 months
procedural success
Time Frame: immediately after Multi-LOC implantation (within the first 30 minutes)
procedural success to pass and treat the target lesion
immediately after Multi-LOC implantation (within the first 30 minutes)
ankle brachial index
Time Frame: < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
ankle brachial index
< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
patency rates
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
patency rates observed using non-invasive Duplex ultrasound
6 and 12 months
Rutherford classification
Time Frame: baseline, < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Rutherford classification
baseline, < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
Rutherford classification shift
Time Frame: < 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
difference in Rutherford classification compared to previous time point
< 3 weeks, 6 months, 12 months
amputation rate
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
rate of major and minor amputations
6 and 12 months
quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
quality of life assessment through validates CRF's
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
B. Braun Melsungen AG

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Deaconess Hospital Mannheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AAG-O-H-1502

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings