Sensory Integration Therapy in Autism: Mechanisms and Effectiveness
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sophie Molholm, Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 7188621823
- Email: sophie.molholm@einstein.yu.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Roseann Schaaf, Ph.D.,
- Phone Number: 2155039609
- Email: Roseann.Schaaf@jefferson.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
- Children's Specialized Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between the ages of 6.0 and 9.5 at the time of enrollment
- Have a diagnosis of ASD that is confirmed by our research certified licensed psychologist based on clinical impression, DSM-5 criteria, and cut off scores from the Autism Diagnostic Schedule -2 (ADOS) (or CARS; an adjustment made as a consequence of pandemic) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview - Revised (ADI-R)
- Has a non-verbal cognitive level of 70 or above (IQ cutoff is based on feasibility study data, and we make exceptions on a case-by-case basis to as low as 65)
- Demonstrate difficulty processing and integrating sensory information as measured by the Sensory Profile (SP; 3 or more subscales or total test score in the definite difference range; or the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test -SIPT-; score of -1.0 on 3 or more subtests)
- Guardians willing to attend 3 weekly sessions for the duration of the period and to refrain from initiation of any new behavioral, therapeutic or alternative treatments during the study period
- If on psychotropic medication, they are at a point where dosage and treatment are stabilized for the duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children who are receiving > 12 hours/week of ongoing ASD-related services(excluding their educational programing), or who are receiving more than one hour per week of services that closely approximate the experimental intervention, will be excluded. Additionally, for safety reasons, children with significant medical co-morbidities (e.g., major heart problems, blindness, deafness, cerebral palsy, Fragile X or Down Syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis) will not be allowed to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Sensory Integration Therapy
Children receive manualized SIT intervention that follows principles of sensory integration.
SIT directly addresses the specific sensory factors hypothesized to underlie the child's functional skills difficulties and follows the Data Driven Decision Making Process, to tailor the intervention to the child's specific sensory issues.
|
Children in the SIT treatment group will receive a manualized SIT intervention that follows the principles of sensory integration.
|
|
Active Comparator: Applied Behavioral Analysis
This involves examination of environmental variables that influence behavior and altering those variables to improve the child's skills.
Intervention is individualized based on identified needs of the child, assessment of environmental variables impacting their performance of specific functional skills, and their abilities.
|
Children in the ABA treatment group will receive intervention that follows the principles of Applied Behavioral Analysis.
|
|
No Intervention: No Treatment
Treatment as usual will occur through the treatment period.
As with the other treatment conditions, the participant agrees to refrain from beginning new treatments during participation in this study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory-Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT) Daily Living
Time Frame: Increase between week 0 and week 12 in functional adaptivity as assessed by PEDI-CAT, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
The PEDI-CAT provides a valid and reliable assessment of the child's ability to perform daily living skills.
The psychometric properties including validity and reliability are well documented and the PEDI-CAT showed good discriminant validity between groups of children with and without disabilities in all domains.
Score estimates were found to be stable over time with strong test-retest reliability
|
Increase between week 0 and week 12 in functional adaptivity as assessed by PEDI-CAT, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
|
The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)
Time Frame: Increase between week 0 and week 12 in functional adaptivity as assessed by AMPS, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
An observation-based, standardized performance assessment of daily living skills .
It has been standardized on more than 150,000 persons, ages 2-100 years of age, internationally and cross-culturally.
|
Increase between week 0 and week 12 in functional adaptivity as assessed by AMPS, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R)
Time Frame: Reduction between week 0 and week 12 in repetitive behavior scale score as assessed by RBS-R, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
The RRB is a 43-item parent rating scale that measures the presence and severity of 6 types of repetitive behaviors: rituals/sameness (12 items), self-injurious behavior (8 items), stereotypic behavior (9 items), compulsive behavior (6 items), and restricted interests (3 items).
The RBS-R yields an overall Total Score and six Subscale Scores, and has demonstrated reliability, stability, and validity in large autism samples.
|
Reduction between week 0 and week 12 in repetitive behavior scale score as assessed by RBS-R, with follow up for stability of change at week 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sophie Molholm, Ph.D., Principal Investigator
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2014-3795
- R01HD082814 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.