Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction (TAPER)

September 2, 2020 updated by: McMaster University

Team Approach to Polypharmacy Evaluation and Reduction: Feasibility Study

In an aging population, most seniors suffer from multiple chronic conditions. When the number of medications taken is ≥5 (polypharmacy), the burden of taking so many together can do more harm than good. This study will test a program focused on medication reduction involving patient, pharmacist and physician using current technology aimed at reducing the harms of polypharmacy. Reducing the risk of adverse effects from drugs or the interactions between them involves prioritizing the most important ones according to the patient's preference and stopping those which may no longer be necessary. Reducing the dose also reduces the risk of drug side effects. Patients, aged over 69 years taking ≥5 medications, will randomly receive the program immediately or at 6 months. The program involves information gathering from the patient, medication review with the pharmacist and then a consultation with the family doctor focused on discontinuing/reducing the dose of medications where possible using a 'pause and monitor' framework to assess the need for restart. An electronic program that detects drug adverse effects and flags potentially inappropriate medications will be integrated into a clinical pathway incorporating monitoring and follow up systems. This study will examine effects on patient and health relevant outcome measures as well as patients' and clinicians' experiences of the program. The results will be used to determine whether this system can be implemented as part of routine preventative care in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive the intervention at study start or delayed appointment 6 months later. The intervention includes initial baseline data collection from the patient including data on demographics, medications, and illness characteristics. The patient will then attend an appointment with a pharmacist to review medications appropriate for discontinuation/dose reduction, after which the patient will meet with his/her family physician to discuss patient preferences for discontinuation/dose reduction. Follow up appointments will take place at one week, 3 months and 6 months (study end). Questionnaires and a semi-structured interview will take place at the 6 month appointment. After six months, the control group will be offered the intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8P 1H6
        • McMaster University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 70 years of age or older
  • Participating family doctor as most responsible provider
  • Patient of McMaster Family Health Team
  • Currently taking 5 or more medications
  • Have not had a recent comprehensive medication review
  • Patient consents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • English language or cognitive skills inadequate to understand and respond to rating scales
  • Terminal illness or other circumstance precluding 13 month study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: TAPER program

The intervention arm is comprised of:

  1. Identification of medications that are appropriate for discontinuation/dose reduction.
  2. Linked pharmacist/family physician consultations with patient to discuss medication discontinuation/dose reduction.
Other: TAPER program
Patients will be randomized to receive the TAPER program at study start or delayed intervention at 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Medication Discontinuation/Dose Reduction
No Intervention: Control
Standard of Care as wait list control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful discontinuation (Difference in mean number of medications)
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in mean number of medications per patient.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 6 months
EQ-5D
6 months
Nutritional Status (Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form)
Time Frame: 6 months
Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form;
6 months
Patient experience of deprescribing (Thematic analysis of semi structured interviews)
Time Frame: 6 months
Thematic analysis of semi structured interviews
6 months
Physical Functional Capacity (Manty structured validated interview)
Time Frame: 6 months
Manty structured validated interview
6 months
Falls (self report number of falls)
Time Frame: 6 months
self report number of falls
6 months
Adverse Events (patient self report or clinician report)
Time Frame: 6 months
patient self report or clinician report
6 months
Health Resource Utilization (Number of hospital admissions and emergency dept visits)
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of hospital admissions and emergency dept visits
6 months
Cognition (The Mini Mental Status Examination)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Mini Mental Status Examination
6 months
Fatigue (Avlund Mob-T Scale)
Time Frame: 6 months
Avlund Mob-T Scale
6 months
Patient Enablement (Patient Enablement Index)
Time Frame: 6 months
Patient Enablement Index
6 months
Self-Efficacy (Stanford Self-Efficacy Scale)
Time Frame: 6 months
Stanford Self-Efficacy Scale
6 months
Patient self report of change in quality of life/morbidity (Global Impression Scale)
Time Frame: 6 months
Global Impression Scale
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
McMaster University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Health Canada
David Braley and Nancy Gordon Chair in Family Medicine
RxISK
The Labarge Optimal Aging Initiative

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dee Mangin, MBChB, DPH, FRNZC, MD, McMaster University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 29, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 2, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TAPER-001-19-Aug-15

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings