Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT)

February 23, 2016 updated by: Stefano Carda, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT) for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intensive, focused training of the affected upper extremity after stroke results in long-term functional gains in moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients, more than 6 months after their vascular accident. During the course of therapy, user's attempts to move and complete exercises are assisted by neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This pilot study quantifies functional gains induced by the Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT), an extension of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy to moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients in their stable plateau phase of recovery. During EAMT, patients can assist affected upper limb movements through functional electrical stimulation. Initially, patients are divided in two groups. One of the groups receives EAMT, the other receives the best possible physical and occupational therapy. Therapy consists in 40 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks, including a one-week therapy break. After 20 sessions, group allocation is crossed-over, and patients don't receive any therapy for one week.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
12

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • VD
      • Lausanne, VD, Switzerland, 1011
        • Service de Neuropsychologie et neuroréhabilitation - CHUV

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of one, first ever stroke (both ischemic or hemorrhagic) verified by brain imaging (MRI or CT);
  • Chronic impairment after stroke (minimum 6 months);
  • No contraindications to MRI;
  • No contraindications to electrical stimulation;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable recovery stage (difference between two examinations > 1 FMA-UE point);
  • Mild impairment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE >= 21);
  • Excessive spasticity of the affected arm (modified Ashworth Scale > 2);

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: EAMT, then standard care
Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy precedes usual and customary care.
Other: Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy
Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT) is an extension of conventional Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) for moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients. During EAMT, patients use a movement controller with the healthy hand, controlling movements generated through neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the paralyzed arm and hand. During each session three types of exercises can be performed: mobilization, games, and training for activities of daily living, all three involving proper shaping of exercise difficulty at therapist discretion. Therapy consists in 20 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks.
Other Names:
  • EAMT
Other: Usual and customary care
Usual and customary care ranges from no treatment to varying amounts of orthotics, home-based and clinic-based occupational therapy, or physiotherapy, but always excludes CIMT and EAMT. Therapy consists in 20 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks, whenever possible, to match EAMT amount of therapy.
Other Names:
  • Standard care
Active Comparator: Standard care, then EAMT
Usual and customary care precedes Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy.
Other: Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy
Electrically Assisted Movement Therapy (EAMT) is an extension of conventional Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) for moderately-to-severely paralyzed patients. During EAMT, patients use a movement controller with the healthy hand, controlling movements generated through neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the paralyzed arm and hand. During each session three types of exercises can be performed: mobilization, games, and training for activities of daily living, all three involving proper shaping of exercise difficulty at therapist discretion. Therapy consists in 20 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks.
Other Names:
  • EAMT
Other: Usual and customary care
Usual and customary care ranges from no treatment to varying amounts of orthotics, home-based and clinic-based occupational therapy, or physiotherapy, but always excludes CIMT and EAMT. Therapy consists in 20 sessions of 45 minutes twice per day over five weeks, whenever possible, to match EAMT amount of therapy.
Other Names:
  • Standard care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE),
Time Frame: T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
A quantitative measure of motor impairment.
T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function Test
Time Frame: T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
Quality and time of task performance
T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
Modified Ashworth scale
Time Frame: T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
A quantitative measure of hand and arm spasticity
T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
European stroke scale
Time Frame: T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
Overall functional status
T0 (Before treatment); T1 (3 weeks after start and before treatment crossover); T2 (6 weeks after T0, at the end of treatment); T3 (3 months after treatment); T4 (6 months after treatment)
Motor Activity Log
Time Frame: T0 (Before treatment); at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 18 and 30 weeks after treatment start
Semi-structured interview to assess arm function.
T0 (Before treatment); at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 18 and 30 weeks after treatment start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stefano Carda, MD, PhD, Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)
  • Study Director: José del R. Millán, Prof., Defitech Foundation Chair in Brain-machine Interface, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 22, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EAMT-346/15

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings