Pragmatic Cluster Trial for Nursing Home Antipsychotic Prescribing

March 22, 2018 updated by: Women's College Hospital

Ontario Appropriate Prescribing Demonstration Project: Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial to Reduce Antipsychotic Medication Prescribing in Long-Term Care Homes

Two arm, pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial, with nursing homes allocated to the full, active intervention (featuring educational outreach offered to each prescriber and team members in the home) or standard quality improvement supports (including online audit and feedback reports for each prescriber in the home). The 'standard' quality improvement supports represent 'usual care' as these are to be launched province-wide; a concurrent control arm with no exposure to a quality improvement intervention is not feasible.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care and Ontario Medical Association have initiated a project aiming to improve appropriateness of prescribing in long-term care facilities (aka nursing homes) through integrated educational supports for nursing home prescribers, inter-professional care teams, as well as residents and family members. The first focus of the project is appropriate prescribing of antipsychotic medications. Working with Health Quality Ontario, the policy makers have determined that all prescribers will have the opportunity to review practice reports detailing their prescribing performance for this class of medication (aka audit and feedback).

The primary question of this pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial is: What is the effect of adding educational outreach compared to the 'usual' quality improvement supports (i.e. audit and feedback) on prescribing of antipsychotic medications in long-term care?

Secondary questions include the following:

i. What is the effect of the intervention on acute care utilization (e.g., emergency room) rates? ii. What is the effect of the intervention on incidence of patient clinical outcomes and/or adverse effects associated with antipsychotic medications (e.g., falls, aggressive behaviours)? iii. What is the effect of the interventions on medications that might be used as alternatives to antipsychotic medications (e.g., benzodiazepines)? iv. What is the cost-benefit, focusing on prescribing outcomes?

Process evaluation questions include the following:

  1. How and why do the interventions work as observed?
  2. Was the intervention implemented as desired in nursing homes?
  3. What were the contextual factors associated with implementation?
  4. Do the interventions affect precursors of behaviour (e.g., motivation, capability)?

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Nursing homes within pre-determined regions of Ontario that expressed an interest in the full intervention (the regions, or hubs, contain a wide variety of nursing home types within a reasonable travel distance [i.e., <100 km])
  • Nursing homes within the hubs in which the medical and administrative leads agree to and support the project

Exclusion criteria:

  • Nursing homes with a previous or ongoing involvement in externally supported quality improvement initiatives focusing on antipsychotic medications
  • Nursing homes without any prescribers caring for at least 10 residents routinely
  • Nursing homes with fewer than 30 residents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Audit + Feedback
'Usual care' / standard quality improvement supports (including online Audit and Feedback reports for each prescriber in the home)
Behavioral: Audit + Feedback
Online Audit + Feedback practice reports detailing prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home. (Details: http://www.hqontario.ca/Quality-Improvement/Practice-Reports/Primary-Care)
Experimental: Audit + Feedback + Educational Outreach
'Active/full' intervention (featuring Educational Outreach offered to each prescriber and team members in the home)
Behavioral: Audit + Feedback
Online Audit + Feedback practice reports detailing prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home. (Details: http://www.hqontario.ca/Quality-Improvement/Practice-Reports/Primary-Care)
Behavioral: Audit + Feedback + Educational Outreach
The Educational Outreach program will be delivered by academic detailers, health professionals (often nurses or pharmacists) who have received specific intensive training to support prescribing providers in a particular environment, in this case long-term care homes, to make the best or appropriate clinical decisions as possible. It is defined as: "an innovative method of service-oriented educational outreach for front-line clinicians. It combines the interactive, one-on-one communication approach of industry detailers with the evidence-based, non-commercial information of academia." The Educational Outreach will be delivered in addition to online Audit + Feedback practice reports, which detail prescribing performance for this class of medication for each prescriber in the nursing home.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antipsychotic dispensing
Time Frame: 6 months post-intervention
Number of days with antipsychotic prescriptions in the last week (count, range 0 - 7)
6 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antipsychotic prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any antipsychotic prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Mean Antipsychotic dose
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Dose equivalent of antipsychotic dispensed in the past month (continuous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Benzodiazepine (or sedative) prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Anti-depressant prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Acetaminophen prescribing
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Any prescription during the past month (dichotomous)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Difficulty in performing activities
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Activities of Daily Living long form scale (continuous variable, range 0-28)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Aggressive behaviour scale
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Extent of aggressive behaviour (continuous variable, range 0-12)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Pain
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Pain scale (continuous variable, range 0-3)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Depression
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Depression rating scale (continuous variable, range 0-14)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Falls
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months post-intervention
Number of falls in the past month (count)
3 and 6 months post-intervention
Emergency Room visits
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
Number of ER visits during the previous 3 months (count)
3 months post-intervention
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 3 months post-intervention
Number of hospital visits visit during the previous 3 months (count)
3 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Women's College Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
Ontario Medical Association
Health Quality Ontario
Centre for Effective Practice

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Noah Ivers, Family Doctor and Research Scientist

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MOHLTCAPDP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings