Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth.
Evaluation of Surgical Time, Post-operative Pain and Marginal Bone Loss in Immediate Implant Using "Nanobone" Versus "Autogenous Bone" for Treatment of Patients With Unrestorable Single Tooth: Randomized Controlled Trials.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Cairo
-
Giza, Cairo, Egypt, 11553
- Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine. Cairo University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering from unrestorable tooth that candidate for classical implant placement .
- Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
- Good oral hygiene and teeth bounding the alveolar ridge is not periodontally affected.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with any systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
- Patient with bad oral hygiene.
- Intra oral soft tissue defect that would affect the closure of the intra oral wound.
- Patients with severely atrophic ridges requiring a staged grafting procedure.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: immediate implants with nanobone graft
Nano-hydroxyapatite bone graft fill the gap between immediate implant and labial bone wall.
|
Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use nanobone graft to fill the gap.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: immediate implants with autogenous bone graft
Autogenous graft fill the gap between immediate implant and labial bone wall.
|
Extraction of unrestorable tooth replaced with immediate implant and use autogenous bone graft to fill the gap.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical time
Time Frame: during surgery
|
device for measurement is stop watch, unit of measurement is minutes.
|
during surgery
|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: during 3 days after surgery
|
device for measurement is visual analog scale, unit of measurement is 1-10 scale.
|
during 3 days after surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
degree of implant stability
Time Frame: after 6 month from the surgery
|
device of measurement is periotest, unit of measurement discrete number.
|
after 6 month from the surgery
|
|
Marginal bone loss
Time Frame: after 6 month from the surgery
|
device of measurement is digital radiograph, unit of measurement millimeter.
|
after 6 month from the surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Samar Nouby, Oral and dental medicine faculty, Cairo university.
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chiapasco M. Early and immediate restoration and loading of implants in completely edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:76-91.
- Becker W, Becker BE. Flap designs for minimization of recession adjacent to maxillary anterior implant sites: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Jan-Feb;11(1):46-54.
- Costantino PD, Friedman CD. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994 Oct;27(5):1037-74.
- Nemeth Z, Suba Z, Hrabak K, Barabas J, Szabo G. [Autogenous bone versus beta-tricalcium phosphate graft alone for bilateral sinus elevations (2-3D CT, histologic and histomorphometric evaluations)]. Orv Hetil. 2002 Jun 23;143(25):1533-8. Hungarian.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SAdam
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.