Evaluating Plaque Photoablation Using an Excimer Laser in Patients With Lower Extremity Vascular Disease

October 23, 2018 updated by: Ra Medical Systems

A Prospective, Multi Center Pilot Study Evaluating Plaque Photoablation Using the RA-308 Excimer Laser in Subjects With Symptomatic Infrainguinal Lower Extremity Vascular Disease

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an excimer laser in the treatment of patients with lower extremity vascular disease with chronic total occlusions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is a multi center, prospective, non-randomized, open-label study conducted at a minimum of one investigational center. 50 subjects can be enrolled. Follow-up occurs at the end of the procedure in the form of an angiogram to determine if the lesion was crossed. Additional follow-up may not necessary because of the binary nature of the crossing, and also because any future follow-up would be assessing the effectiveness of adjunct therapy, e.g. balloon angioplasty. Long term results are entirely dependent on this subsequent treatment. Because the DABRA crosser only allows adjunct devices to be used, 30-day follow-up measuring the performance of the adjunct therapy might affect the physician's choice of therapy, and compromise the patient's treatment. Therefore, 30-day follow-up, which evaluates the effectiveness of the adjunct therapy, might raise ethical concerns. However, the follow-up can be done by Ankle-Brachial Index, Doppler ultrasound, auscultation, or by discussion of the level of claudication and motion pain with the patient. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the RA-308 Excimer Laser System and DABRA Catheter for treating subjects with symptomatic infrainguinal lower extremity vascular disease with chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed with standard guide wires, or lesions where an attempt to cross would, in the opinion of the interventionalist, result in either a subintimal path or a perforation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • El Centro, California, United States, 92243
        • California Heart & Vascular Clinic
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California San Diego
    • Mississippi
      • Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39402
        • Merit Health Wesley

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • signed informed consent
  • symptomatic infrainguinal lower extremity vascular disease (Rutherford category 3, 4, 5 or 6), stable for at least 2 weeks prior to study inclusion
  • lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA), popliteal, or infrapopliteal arteries at least one angiographically identifiable infrageniculate artery
  • patients must be poor surgical candidates, indicated by at least one of the following conditions:
  • absence of venous autologous grafts (that is, lack of a suitable vein to use for bypass)
  • poor (diffusely diseased or <=1mm diameter) or no distal vessels available for graft anastamosis
  • high risk of surgical mortality, evidenced by American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Class 4 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age below 18 years
  • pregnancy, or plan to become pregnant
  • participation in another cardiovascular or peripheral vascular study
  • myocardial infarction (MI) in prior month
  • stents at treatment site
  • disorders or allergies precluding use of radiographic contrast
  • renal insufficiency sever enough to contraindicate use of radiographic contrast
  • contraindication to treatment with anticoagulants
  • untreated ipsilateral iliac stenosis >70%
  • inability or unwillingness of the patient to comply with intended examinations
  • unavailability of required procedural or imaging equipment
  • lesion located in a graft
  • hemodynamically significant arrhythmia or left ventricular ejection fraction <20%
  • life expectancy less than 6 months
  • necrosis necessitating major amputation
  • unwillingness of the patient to be anti-coagulated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: RA-308 Excimer Laser and DABRA Catheter
Treatment with the RA-308 excimer laser and DABRA catheter to treat chronic total occlusions that cannot be crossed with standard guidewires. The catheter and laser are a system, and cannot be used separately.
Device: RA-308 Excimer Laser and DABRA Catheter
See information already included in arm description

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crossing the Target Lesion
Time Frame: at time of procedure
Crossing the target lesion based on angiographic analysis
at time of procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With no Device-related Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: at time of procedure, up to an hour
Number of participants with no device-related major adverse events as determined by physician evaluation
at time of procedure, up to an hour
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of participants with target lesion revascularization as determined by physician evaluation
30 days
Number of Participants With Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participants with target lesion revascularization as determined by physician evaluation
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ra Medical Systems

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ehtisham Mahmud, UCSD

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 7, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 3, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 23, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RMS-102

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings