Study of Idursulfase-beta (GC1111) in Hunter Syndrome

January 21, 2016 updated by: Green Cross Corporation

Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Idursulfase-beta (GC1111) in Hunter Syndrome (Mucopolysaccharidosis II) Patients

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of three doses of GC1111 in patients with Hunter Syndrome. Participants will be randomized to one of three doses of GC1111 or comparator.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, dose-ranging study, where patient will receive one of the three doses of GC1111 (0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg) or ELAPRASE 0.5 mg/kg. Approximately 20 patients will be administrated each study drug once every week as an iv infusion for 24 weeks. Efficacy of GC1111 will be evaluated in Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), urine Glycosaminoglycans(uGAG), liver and spleen volume, percent predicted Forced Vital Capacity(FVC), and cardiac size and function. Also immunogenicity, Pharmacokinetics(PK) and safety will be evaluated.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 35 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients between 5 and 35 years of age
  • Informed consent form signed
  • Patients diagnosed with hunter syndrome
  • Previously untreated with an enzyme replacement therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of tracheostomy, bone marrow transplant, or cord blood transplant
  • Treatment with another investigational product within 30 days prior to the start of study drug
  • Known hypersensitivity of any of the ingredients of study drug
  • Patient with severe hunter syndrome who cannot perform 6MWT
  • Female patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm 1
0.5 mg/kg, iv, weekly infusion of idursulfase beta for 24 weeks
Biological: idursulfase beta
IV, weekly infusion for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • GC1111
Experimental: Arm 2
1.0 mg/kg, iv, weekly infusion of idursulfase beta for 24 weeks
Biological: idursulfase beta
IV, weekly infusion for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • GC1111
Experimental: Arm 3
1.5 mg/kg, iv, weekly infusion of idursulfase beta for 24 weeks
Biological: idursulfase beta
IV, weekly infusion for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • GC1111
Active Comparator: Arm 4
0.5mg/kg, iv, weekly infusion of idursulfase for 24 weeks
Biological: idursulfase
0.5 mg/kg, iv, weekly infusion for 24 weeks
Other Names:
  • Elaprase

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percent change from baseline in urinary GAG(Glycosaminoglycans) at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in urinary GAG at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25
Change from baseline in Six Minute Walk Test at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25
Percent change from baseline in Six Minute Walk Test at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25
Change from baseline in Liver volume at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Liver volume measured by MRI
Baseline to Week 25
Percent change from baseline in Liver volume at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Liver volume measured by MRI
Baseline to Week 25
Change from baseline in Spleen volume at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Spleen volume measured by MRI
Baseline to Week 25
Percent change from baseline in Spleen volume at Week 25
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Spleen volume measured by MRI
Baseline to Week 25
Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25
Safety changes from baseline in clinical laboratory tests, physical examination and vital signs
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
Baseline to Week 25
Immunogenicity
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 25
anti-drug-antibody
Baseline to Week 25
Pharmacokinetic profile - Area under the serum concentration time curve (AUClast)
Time Frame: 1 and 17 week
1 and 17 week
Pharmacokinetic profile - Maximum observed peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: 1 and 17 week
1 and 17 week
Pharmacokinetic profile - Time at which Cmax is observed (Tmax)
Time Frame: 1 and 17 week
1 and 17 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Green Cross Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 21, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GC1111B_P2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings