Evaluation of Low-dose Darunavir in a Switch Study (DRV)

June 21, 2018 updated by: Willem Daniel Francois Venter

A Randomised, Open Label Switch Study Comparing Darunavir/Ritonavir 400mg/100mg Daily With Lopinavir/Ritonavir 800mg/200mg Daily, in HIV-positive Participants

This is a switch study to assess the non-inferiority (in terms of efficacy and safety) of darunavir (boosted with ritonavir, DRV/r 400mg/100mg daily) when compared with lopinavir (boosted with ritonavir, LPV/r total dose 800mg/200mg daily), in combination with a nucleoside backbone, administered as a second line therapy in HIV positive individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open label randomised, parallel group, phase 3b, switch study to demonstrate non-inferiority of low-dose boosted darunavir (DRV/RTV 400/100 mg once daily) compared with boosted lopinavir-based (LPV/RTV 800/200 mg daily) second-line regimens when administered over 48 weeks in combination with two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients infected with HIV-1 who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen. All medications will be provided in an open-label design. Patients who are virologically suppressed and stable on a standard second-line regimen will be recruited for the study. There are concerns that switching these patients may result in virological failure as the study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of darunavir compared with Lopinavir. In such cases, the investigator will ensure that virological failures are investigated and patients are switched back to standard of care immediately. Participants will be patients who are receiving HIV treatment in public clinics. Interested patients will be invited to the study, information given, and only those who will give written informed consent will be screened, and if eligible enrolled into the study. Each enrolled participant will be follow-up at week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 (exit visit) from enrolment date. Data will be collected using ethics-approved worksheets, and captured into REDCap. The data manager will ensure data are correct and complete by performing data verifications - physical and electronic. Internal quality control will be performed by dedicated staff based on the study quality plan to be implemented. The external study monitor will perform 100% eligibility checks on all signed informed consents in addition to other source verifications during her periodic site visits according to the monitoring plan to be implemented. Findings from the monitor will be implemented in the form of data/procedure corrections per good clinical practice, and all relevant staff trained and documented accordingly. Participants' records will be coded and stored in a lockable cabinet. Only study staff will have access to participants' records. All electronic documents relating to the study will be stored in password-protected computers and only accessible to study staff. Study staff are not allowed to share password among themselves or with anyone outside the study team. Designed in non-inferiority fashion, this study will enrol approximately 300 participants for 80% power to detect a 10% non-inferiority margin in the per protocol (PP) analysis. A Data Safety Management Board (DSMB) will oversee and review the interim data report. At the close of the study, results will be disseminated to participants, and the scientific community, as well as updated on clinicaltrial.gov.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • South Africa
    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 2196
        • Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is aged ≥18 years
  • Participant weight >40kg
  • Participant is on a LPV/r-containing regimen for at least 6 months with no history of other protease inhibitors
  • Participant has a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 copies/mL in the last 60 days
  • Participant is informed and has the ability to comprehend the full nature and purpose of the study, and give voluntary written informed consent before inclusion in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who are taking any antiretrovirals other than nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors and LPV/r
  • Any prior history of genotype-documented protease inhibitor resistance
  • Participants who are taking rifampicin or any other therapy with major cytochrome P450 interactions, within the last month
  • Participants who are allergic to sulphonamides
  • Participants who have a current history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the investigator, may be an impediment to participant adherence to the protocol
  • Female participants who are currently pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Female participants desiring pregnancy during the next year
  • Participants who have a strong likelihood of relocating far enough to make access to the study site difficult
  • Any condition(s) or laboratory report that, in the opinion of the investigator, might put the participant at risk, or interfere with the study objectives or the participant's adherence to study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Darunavir
Darunavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg once daily
Drug: Darunavir
Darunavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (DRV/r) once daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Other Names:
  • Boosted darunavir (DRV/r)
Active Comparator: Lopinavir
Lopinavir/Ritonavir 400/100mg twice daily
Drug: Lopinavir
Lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (LPV/r) twice daily plus nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Other Names:
  • Boosted lopinavir (LVP/r)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of participants with undetectable HIV-1 RNA levels
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48
Number of participants with certain adverse events related to the treatment
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time to virologic failure
Time Frame: Week 48
Week 48

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Lipids measure
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 and 48
Baseline, Week 24 and 48
Fasting glucose measure
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 48
Baseline and Week 48
Creatinine clearance measure
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, and 48
Baseline, Week 12, 24, and 48

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Willem Daniel Francois Venter

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medical Research Council, South Africa

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WRHI052

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings