Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Dalbavancin Versus Active Comparator in Adult Participants With Osteomyelitis

December 11, 2018 updated by: Durata Therapeutics Inc., an affiliate of Allergan plc

A Phase 2, Single-center, Open-label, Randomized, Comparator-controlled Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Dalbavancin Versus Active Comparator in Adult Patients With Osteomyelitis Known or Suspected to be Due to Gram-Positive Organisms

This clinical study will be a single-center, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study comparing dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) therapy in osteomyelitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ukraine
      • Cherkasy, Ukraine, 18009
        • Allergan Investigative Site 001

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of osteomyelitis (first episode) defined by:
  • Pain or point tenderness upon palpation or probing to bone
  • Plain radiograph or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) consistent with osteomyelitis (indistinctly marginated edema-like pattern of bone marrow hypointensity on unenhanced T1-weighted sequences, hyperintensity on fat-saturated T2-weighted and Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and/or abnormal enhancement on gadolinium-enhanced fat-saturated T2-weighted sequences, with or without visible periostitis or cortical bone destruction) OR Gram-positive cocci documented on a baseline Gram-stain from a bone specimen
  • Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (low sensitivity) above the upper limit of normal (ULN) (reference range for low sensitivity CRP is 3-10 mg/L)
  • Participants must be willing and able, if discharged from the hospital, to return to the hospital or a designated clinic for scheduled visits, treatment, laboratory tests, and other outpatient procedures as required by the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days preceding the first dose of investigational product.
  • Receipt of > 24 hours of potentially effective IV antibacterial therapy for osteomyelitis within 96 hours of randomization, unless the pathogen isolated was documented to be Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) that was resistant to the administered antibiotic.
  • A prior episode of osteomyelitis, or a failed course of therapy for osteomyelitis.
  • Infection associated with a burn wound, with a sacral decubitus ulcer, or with multiple sites of osteomyelitis.
  • Septic arthritis that is non-contiguous to osteomyelitis, as diagnosed by isolation of a pathogen from synovial fluid culture.
  • Immunosuppression/immune deficiency
  • Evidence of Gram-negative bacteria by Gram stain in the absence of Gram-positive organisms.
  • Gram-negative bacteremia
  • Patients with concomitant endocarditis, necrotizing fasciitis, or prosthetic material at the site of infection at the time of study initiation.
  • Infection due to an organism known prior to study entry to not be susceptible to dalbavancin (dalbavancin mean inhibitory concentration [MIC] > 0.12 μg/mL) or vancomycin (vancomycin MIC > 2 μg/mL).
  • Concomitant systemic antibacterial therapy for Gram-positive infections (eg, rifampin, gentamicin).
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to glycopeptide antibiotics.
  • Patients with a rapidly fatal illness, who are not expected to survive for 3 months.
  • Pregnant or nursing females; positive urine (or serum) pregnancy test at Screening (pre-menopausal females only) or after admission (prior to dosing)
  • Sexually active females of childbearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of contraception from at least the first dose of study drug until the last pregnancy test.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Antibiotic consistent with Standard of Care (SOC), based on baseline pathogen, for 4 to 6 weeks.
Drug: Comparator
Experimental: Dalbavancin
Dalbavancin 1500 mg, intravenous (IV) administration over 30 minutes on Day 1 and Day 8. If creatinine clearance was < 30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) and participant was not receiving regular hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, dalbavancin dose was decreased to 1000 mg.
Drug: Dalbavancin
Other Names:
  • Dalvance®
  • Xydalba™

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 42 in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 365 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 365
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 365

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement at Day 21 in the mITT Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 21
Clinical improvement was defined as no worsening of pain from baseline, if present (subjective pain and/or point tenderness), and improvement in inflammation (as measured by C-reactive protein [CRP]).
Baseline to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement at Day 21 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Baseline to Day 21
Clinical improvement was defined as no worsening of pain from baseline, if present (subjective pain and/or point tenderness), and improvement in inflammation (as measured by C-reactive protein [CRP]).
Baseline to Day 21
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 42 in the mITT Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 42 in the Microbiological Modified Intent-to-Treat (Micro-mITT) Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 42
Percentage of Participant With Clinical Response at Day 180 in the mITT Population
Time Frame: Day 180
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 180 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 180
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 180
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 365 in the mITT Population
Time Frame: Day 365
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 365
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure by Baseline Pathogen at Day 42 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 42
Number of Participants With Clinical Cure by Baseline Pathogen at Day 180 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 180
Clinical response was either cure, failure or indeterminate. A cure was defined as recovery without need for additional antibiotic therapy. A failure was defined as the requirement of additional antibiotic therapy for no response or worsening after improvement, new purulence, amputation due to progression of infection (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit), requiring >6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for participants in the standard of care arm or death (for any reason). Indeterminate was defined as lost to follow-up or amputation due to vascular insufficiency (from initiation of study drug to outcome assessment visit).
Day 180

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Durata Therapeutics Inc., an affiliate of Allergan plc

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Urania Rappo, MD, MS, PharmD, Allergan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DAL-MD-04

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings