Experimental Study to Determine the Effects of Human Refluxate on Macrophage Phenotype and Its Correlation With GERD

February 17, 2022 updated by: Ivashkin Vladimir Trofimovich

Experimental Study to Determine the Effects of Human Refluxate (Biliary, Gastric, Duodenogastric) on Macrophage Phenotype and Its Correlation With Different Forms of GERD: Motility Talent Group Study

This study is proposed to evaluate the role of motoric dysfunctions and type of refluxate in GERD patients, analyzed the blood monocyte/macrophage phenotypes of gastroesophageal reflux diseases (GERD) patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD), erosive esophagitis (EE) and Barrett esophagus (BE) were enrolled. We investigated blood monocyte/macrophage phenotype in patients with different forms of GERD. We analysed of macrophages phenotype by CD25, CD80, CD163, CD206 expression for M2 macrophages. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with esophagus biopsy. GERD patients underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) with a 22-channel water-perfused catheter and Solar GI system (Medical Measurements Systems, Enschede, the Netherlands) and 24-hour impedance and pH monitoring using the Ohmega Ambulatory Impedance pH Recorder (Medical Measurements Systems).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119991
        • I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 127473
        • Moscow state university of medicine and dentistry named after A.I. Evdokimov

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Clinical (patients) part

  1. Signed informed consent
  2. Gender: Male or Female
  3. Age: 18-65 years of age

3. Clinically and/or endoscopically confirmed diagnosis of GERD

Exclusion Criteria:

Clinical: (patient)

  1. Current treatment with proton pump inhibitors and/or histamine-2 receptor antagonists. These treatments should have been stopped at least 1 week prior to study inclusion.
  2. Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant or lactating
  3. Any acute diseases or conditions, exacerbations of concomitant chronic diseases (including but not limited to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcer disease etc.) at study start/inclusion and/or which are not resolved 14 days prior to study-enrolment.
  4. Participation in a clinical trial in the past 3 months
  5. Any condition which, in the opinion of investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: NERD patients
Patients have typical reflux syndrome without esophageal injury.
Procedure: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy and collection of refluxate
we analyzed esophageal mucosa, expression of inflammatory changes, location, size, number of mucosal defects, as well as the appearance of the gastric and duodenal mucosa.
Other Names:
  • EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) with esophagus biopsy
Procedure: Esophageal high-resolution manometry and 24-h esophageal pH-impedance monitoring
we analyzed following HRM parameters: the distal contractile integral (DCI), the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LES RP) and standard measuring parameters were be collected: percentage of total time when pH was <4, longest reflux event, number of reflux events longer than 5 minutes, and number of reflux episodes in 24 hours.
Other Names:
  • HRM and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring
Experimental: EE patients
Patients have erosion(s) or ulcer(s) in esophagus.
Procedure: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy and collection of refluxate
we analyzed esophageal mucosa, expression of inflammatory changes, location, size, number of mucosal defects, as well as the appearance of the gastric and duodenal mucosa.
Other Names:
  • EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) with esophagus biopsy
Procedure: Esophageal high-resolution manometry and 24-h esophageal pH-impedance monitoring
we analyzed following HRM parameters: the distal contractile integral (DCI), the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LES RP) and standard measuring parameters were be collected: percentage of total time when pH was <4, longest reflux event, number of reflux events longer than 5 minutes, and number of reflux episodes in 24 hours.
Other Names:
  • HRM and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring
Experimental: BE patients
Patients have esophageal specialized intestinal metaplasia.
Procedure: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy and collection of refluxate
we analyzed esophageal mucosa, expression of inflammatory changes, location, size, number of mucosal defects, as well as the appearance of the gastric and duodenal mucosa.
Other Names:
  • EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) with esophagus biopsy
Procedure: Esophageal high-resolution manometry and 24-h esophageal pH-impedance monitoring
we analyzed following HRM parameters: the distal contractile integral (DCI), the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LES RP) and standard measuring parameters were be collected: percentage of total time when pH was <4, longest reflux event, number of reflux events longer than 5 minutes, and number of reflux episodes in 24 hours.
Other Names:
  • HRM and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Reflux in GERD Patients
Time Frame: Day 4
We analyzed the number of acid and weakly acid reflux episodes in GERD patients
Day 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ivashkin Vladimir Trofimovich

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Abbott

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Vladimir Ivashkin, MD,PhD,Prof., I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 18, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EPIDKO19

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings