Mirabegron as Medical Expulsive Therapy (MET) for Ureteral Stones and Ureteral Stent Pain

April 4, 2022 updated by: Wesley Adam Mayer, Baylor College of Medicine

A Double Blind Placebo Control Trial of Mirabegron for Medical Expulsive Therapy and to Manage Stent Pain for Ureteral Stones(Protocol # 01-16-20-02)

The study will be a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron for medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with a CT (Computed Tomography) scan-proven ureteral stone between 4 to 10 mm undergoing expectant management.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will be a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mirabegron for medical expulsive therapy (MET) in patients with a CT scan-proven ureteral stone between 4 to 10 mm undergoing expectant management. Subjects will be distributed at a 1:1 ratio between the control and treatment groups. The treatment group will receive mirabegron and the control groups will receive a placebo. Both groups will receive analgesics and hydration will be recommended. All subjects will then be followed for 30 days to determine the proportion of subjects with spontaneous passage. Patients will record narcotic usage and pain scores during this time. If there is stone persistence in the ureter based on imaging (CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis versus renal ultrasound plus KUB), then the patient will undergo ureteroscopy with stent placement. In these patients, treatment will continue while the stent is in place and patients will fill out a validated questionnaire regarding stent pain.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Ben Taub General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Single unilateral ureteral calculus 4 to 10 mm visible on CT scan within the ureter
  • Serum creatinine within normal range
  • Ability to tolerate oral fluids and oral pain medication
  • Able to make informed medical decisions regarding consent
  • Willingness to follow-up in the Urology Clinic in approximately 30 day
  • Willing to undergo ureteroscopic extraction should the stone not pass in this time period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults unable to consent
  • Age less than 18
  • Multiple stones
  • Solitary kidney
  • Horseshoe kidney
  • On immunosuppressant therapy
  • On digoxin
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (Systolic blood pressure > 170, diastolic blood pressure > 110)
  • History of ureteral surgery or previous endoscopic procedure
  • Allergy to mirabegron
  • Current calcium antagonist or corticosteroid or tamsulosin usage
  • Patients already taking a beta-adrenergic agonist medication
  • Renal insufficiency [Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) less than 60]
  • Patients with Childs B and C liver failure

  • Signs of infection i. Temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius ii. Urinalysis with any of the following positive:

    1. Positive nitrites
    2. White blood cell count greater than 15/hpf (high powered field)
    3. Positive urine culture [defined as a single isolated bacterial species population of greater than 100,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)]
  • Patients with chronic pain already undergoing treatment with narcotic medications
  • Pregnant women and nursing mothers
  • Prisoners
  • No working phone number

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Arm 1 - Active
Mirabegron 50 mg orally once every 24 hours starting immediately
Drug: Mirabegron
Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus >5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.
Other Names:
  • Myrbetriq
Placebo Comparator: Arm 2 - Placebo
Placebo orally once every 24 hours starting immediately
Other: Placebo
Randomized 1:1 ratio using a randomized block design, stratified by stone size (≤5 mm versus >5 mm) and location (upper versus lower ureter). The randomization will be implemented through a database with software designed by the Director of Research Informatics at the Baylor College of Medicine's Dan Duncan Institute of Clinical and Translational Research. It will be a HIPPA-compliant secure database accessible via internet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spontaneous Stone Passage Using Fisher's Exact Test
Time Frame: 30 days
The primary outcome was stone passage rate at 30-days defined by either imaging (CT or Renal Ultrasound/KUB) or identification of stone using a straining device.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Pain Levels Between Treatment Groups Using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2 months
Pain measures between treatment groups will be measured daily for each patient by using the Wong-Baker Pain Rating Scale. The Questionnaire will be observed in patients who require surgical intervention, and will be observed during study visit. A general linear model will be used to compare Wong-Baker pain scores between the treated and placebo groups. The model will also be used to explore associations between pain scores and demographic or clinical characteristics adjusting for treatment group.
2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baylor College of Medicine

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wesley A. Mayer, MD, Baylor College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-38959

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be published in a aggregate format after completion of study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings