Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Two Products Containing Rosuvastatin (20 mg/Tablet)

July 4, 2016 updated by: Verisfield UK Ltd. Greek Branch

A Pivotal, Open-label, Balanced, Randomised, Two-treatment, Two-sequence, Two-period, Two-way Crossover, Single Oral Dose Bioequivalence Study of Rosuvastatin/ Verisfield 20 mg Film-coated Tablets Versus Crestor/ AstraZeneca 20 mg Film-coated Tablets in Healthy Adults Under Fasting Conditions

The purpose of this study is to determine the bioequivalence of Rosuvastatin/ Verisfield 20 mg film-coated tablets and Crestor™/ AstraZeneca 20 mg film-coated tablets.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study aims to compare the absorption and disposition kinetics of two products containing rosuvastatin under fasting conditions. These products are: Rosuvastatin/ Verisfield 20 mg film-coated tablets, a Test product manufactured by HELP S.A., Greece and Crestor™/ AstraZeneca 20 mg film-coated tablets, a Reference product manufactured by AstraZeneca, UK. The bioequivalence of a single 20 mg dose of both products will be assessed by comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the plasma concentration-time profiles for rosuvastatin.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
49

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Gujarat
      • Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 380056
        • Synchron Research Services Pvt. Ltd.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 41 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willingness to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Comprehension of the nature and purpose of the study and willingness to comply with the requirements of the entire procedure.
  • Healthy adult, human Indian volunteers within the age range of 18 to 45 years (both inclusive).
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 18.50 kg/m2 to ≤ 30.00 kg/m2.
  • Hemoglobin: ≥12.0 gm% for male and ≥11.5 gm% for female.
  • Absence of disease markers of HIV I & II, HBsAg, HCVAb and P24 antigen test.
  • Females of childbearing age must be practicing an acceptable form of birth control for at least six months before screening, unless they have had bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation or their male partner has had vasectomy.
  • Females of childbearing age agree to use acceptable form of birth control during the study and until the drug is washed out from the body, i.e. at least 14 days after last dosing, unless they have had bilateral oophorectomy or tubal ligation or their male partner has had vasectomy.
  • Absence of significant disease or clinically significant abnormal laboratory values during the laboratory evaluations.
  • Absence of any diseases in medical history or physical examination during the screening.
  • Have a normal 12-lead ECG or one with abnormality considered clinically insignificant.
  • Have a normal chest X-ray (P. A. view).
  • Non smokers (since last six months)
  • Negative serum β-HCG at the time of screening (for females only)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History / evidence of allergy or hypersensitivity to rosuvastatin or to any of the excipients or to any other drug.
  • Any major illness within the last three months or any significant ongoing chronic medical illness.
  • History of or active liver or kidney disease.
  • History of or active deep vein thrombosis and thromboembolic disorders.
  • History of breast cancer, endometrial cancer or other estrogen-dependent neoplasia, endometriosis and undiagnosed vaginal bleeding (for females only).
  • History of drug abuse (including barbiturates, benzodiazepines, opioids, cocaine, cannabinoids and amphetamine etc.) within the last three months.
  • History of neuropsychiatric diseases.
  • History of hypothyroidism.
  • Personal or family history of hereditary muscular disorders.
  • History of myopathy.
  • History of myalgia.
  • History of rhabdomyolysis.
  • History of alcohol abuse.
  • History of proteinuria.
  • Asian population (except Indian).
  • History of interstitial lung disease.
  • History of or current gastro-intestinal diseases influencing drug absorption.
  • History of alcoholism (more than two years), moderate drinkers (more than three drinks per day).
  • Participation in any clinical trial within last three months.
  • History of difficulty with donating blood or difficulty in accessibility of veins in left or right arm.
  • Donation of blood (one unit or 350 mL or more) within last three months.
  • Use of any prescription drug therapy within last two weeks and over the counter (OTC) drugs or herbal products within last one week.
  • Pregnant women.
  • Breast feeding women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Test Product
Rosuvastatin 20 mg film-coated tablets
Drug: Rosuvastatin 20 mg film-coated tablets
Single oral dose of 20 mg
Active Comparator: Reference product
Crestor 20 mg film-coated tablets
Drug: Crestor 20 mg film-coated tablets
Single oral dose of 20 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the plasma concentration (AUC0-t) from zero (0) hours to time (t)
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve, from time zero (0) to t hours
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Maximum concentration (Cmax)
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Maximum measured plasma concentration
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to maximum concentration (Tmax)
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Time of the maximum measured plasma concentration. If the maximum value occurs at more than one time point, tmax is defined as the first time point with this value
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Elimination rate constant (Kel)
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Apparent first-order elimination or terminal rate constant
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Terminal half life (t1/2)
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
The elimination or terminal half-life
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Area under the plasma concentration (AUC0-infinity) from zero (0) hours to infinity
Time Frame: Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time (0) to infinity
Before dosing (0 hour) and 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 6.00, 7.00, 8.00, 10.00, 12.00, 16.00, 24.00, 36.00 and 48.00 hours post-dose
Number of participants with Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 days
6 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Verisfield UK Ltd. Greek Branch

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kathiria Jayesh, M.D., Synchron Research Services Pvt. Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ROS/2016/1278

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings