Advanced Prostate Imaging of Recurrent Cancer After Radiotherapy (PICs)

March 24, 2022 updated by: Glenn Bauman, Lawson Health Research Institute
The investigators are attempting to determine if a new form of imaging called 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT is helpful to physicians in deciding how to manage suspected prostate cancer recurrence. This imaging uses a Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scan using a radioactive tracer 18F-DCFPyL that is concentrated in prostate cancer cells and can potentially identify cancer cells throughout the body. The combination of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT can potentially identify areas of prostate cancer recurrence not seen with usual imaging [bone scan, computed tomography (CT) thorax, abdomen and pelvis, plus multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)].

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will evaluate the utility of investigational restaging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT following conventional imaging (bone scan, CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis plus multi-parametric pelvic MRI) in detecting the prevalence of metastatic disease among men with biochemical recurrence after radical radiotherapy treatment to the prostate. Men treated with primary radiation with external beam or brachytherapy will be eligible. Eighty (80) eligible consenting patients with biochemical recurrence and potentially suitable for local salvage or targeted ablative therapies will be registered and imaged with conventional imaging (bone scan, CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis plus multi-parametric pelvic MRI) followed by investigational restaging with 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Characterizing sites of disease identified by the combination of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT with conventional imaging versus 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT alone will be used to explore the potential of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT as a single restaging study in men with biochemical recurrence. While further investigation and treatment after restaging will be at the discretion of the investigator and the patient, the actual treatment/management, treatment outcomes and quality of life will be recorded in an electronic database at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after re-staging. Such longitudinal analyses of management and outcomes will be useful in characterizing the disease trajectory, response to treatment and quality of life for patients whose recurrent disease is managed based on comprehensive restaging using the combination of conventional imaging and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton Health Sciences Centre
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4L6
        • London Regional Cancer Program of the Lawson Health Research Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Toronto Sunnybrook Cancer Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy for localized disease (T1-T2, Gleason < 7 and PSA < 20) or (T1-2, Gleason 8, prostatic specific antigen (PSA)<10)
  • Interval to biochemical failure more than 12 months from last radical therapeutic intervention
  • Biochemical failure confirmed on at least 3 consecutive PSA measurements each taken at least 1 month apart
  • PSA at time of enrollment more than nadir+2.0ng/ml (Phoenix definition of biochemical failure)
  • Karnofsky performance status 70 or better [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0,1]
  • Total serum testosterone level >1nmol/l (if prior treatment with hormone therapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CT or bone scan within 6 months of enrollment
  • Patients whose prior radiotherapy was delivered with palliative intent
  • Patients with known metastatic disease
  • Extensive co-morbidities precluding potential ablative salvage procedures
  • Prior history of invasive non-cutaneous malignant disease unless disease free for at least 5 years
  • Already on systemic anticancer treatment (androgen deprivation or chemotherapy)
  • Inability to comply with the imaging requirements e.g. inability to lie supine for one hour
  • Allergy or contraindication to MRI or CT contrast agents or PET tracer to be used as part of the imaging
  • Insufficient renal function [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min]

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT
18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scan obtained at the time of restaging for biochemical recurrence after primary radiotherapy
Radiation: 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT scan
PET/CT scan using the radioactive agent 18F-DCFPyL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of extra-prostatic disease
Time Frame: 2 weeks post re-staging
Number of men with extra-prostatic disease detected by either 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT or conventional imaging, divided by the number of men undergoing imaging.
2 weeks post re-staging

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection of extra-prostatic disease exclusive to 18F-DCFPyl PET/CT
Time Frame: 2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Number of men who have extra-prostatic disease detected exclusively on 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT.
2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Detection of lesions per subject and overall population
Time Frame: 2 weeks post re-staging imaging
The number of extra-prostatic lesions detected by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT versus conventional imaging alone will be compared on a per subject and overall population basis.
2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Location of extra-prostatic lesions
Time Frame: 2 weeks post re-staging imaging
The location of extra-prostatic lesions detected by 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT versus conventional imaging.
2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Planned treatment management based on re-staging imaging
Time Frame: 2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Planned treatment management based on the information from 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT compared to conventional imaging, to characterize the impact on patient care.
2 weeks post re-staging imaging
Actual treatment management assessed by physician completed study specific questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
A questionnaire developed specifically for the study, called the Post-PET Management Form, will be completed by the attending physician, noting any changes to the treatment based on the results of the 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT imaging. Treatment options may include, but are not limited to, surgery, radiotherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, cryotherapy, and observation.
6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
Disease status (Is the patient alive, deceased, has active disease, or no evidence of disease?)
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
The investigators want to determine if the patient is alive, deceased, has active disease or no evidence of disease, at approximately yearly intervals. The source of this data could come from physician notes, lab tests, imaging reports, pathology report, or directly from the patient.
6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
Quality of life is measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) standardized questionnaires.
6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after re-staging imaging
Disease burden measured by serum and urine biomarkers versus imaging
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline serum and urine will be obtained for future correlative studies of novel biomarkers of disease burden for comparison against measures of disease burden provided by imaging.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lawson Health Research Institute

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 9, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 19, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PICS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings