An Internet-based Information Platform for Vulvodynia Patients (EMBLA)

April 27, 2021 updated by: Uppsala University

The EMBLA Project - An Internet-based Intervention as a Supplement to Clinical Management for Vulvodynia Patients

Vulvodynia is a very common but vastly under-diagnosed and under-treated gynaecological condition that leads to extreme suffering for both the women involved but also their partners. It has also been shown to be associated with poor quality of life, leading to depression and anxiety states. When left untreated, the condition takes a very long time to resolve, with a substantial associated disability and suffering. Both psycho-education and internet-based interventions have been shown to be highly successful while they can be quite affordable. This makes them highly cost-effective. The present study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of such an intervention among a vulvodynia patient population from the clinics of Uppsala, Falun, Orebro and Gävle. The patients will be recruited by treating physicians and given access to the internet-based platform, where they will fill out questionnaires during four different time-points, after randomization to the control or the intervention group. The intervention group will also have access to multiple activities and information material uploaded in the internet-based platform. Differences in pain, quality of life and mental health parameter outcomes will be assessed at the end of the study. Should this intervention prove effective, it will be implemented in clinical praxis in the four regions.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Sweden
      • Uppsala, Sweden, 75185
        • Gynecological Department, Akademiska Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Vulvodynia patients at their initial evaluation visit to a physician providing written informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to read and understand Swedish
  • severe mental illness
  • currently in treatment for vulvodynia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Internet-based intervention
Patients randomized to the internet-based intervention will be given access to the information in the internet-based platform directly after randomization. During the first 6 weeks, information will be offered in a structured way, with a "theme" changing weekly. After this time-point, the patients will have the possibility to navigate through all information. The platform encompasses internet-based training including information on the disorder, psycho-education and information of simple self-implemented intervention strategies cope with vulvodynia and ameliorate dyspareunia. The platform will also include videos where team members will describe their role in treating patients with the disorder, but also short videos from former patients willing to share their individual stories.
Behavioral: Internet-based platform
Internet-based platform with information and training modules based on acceptance and commitment therapy for vulvodynia patients
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Patients randomized to the control group through the platform will immediately be informed about the fact that there is available information and resources on the internet and that they will be called for a visit to the physiotherapist-midwife at due time, according to the present guidelines of care followed in the respective clinic (Uppsala, Falun, Gävle).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unprovoked pain change, post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Change in self-reported unprovoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Unprovoked pain change, end of clinical treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to end of clinical treatment (typically 10-12 months) or 1 year following inclusion
Change in self-reported unprovoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and after completion of clinical treatment or 1 year following inclusion.
Baseline to end of clinical treatment (typically 10-12 months) or 1 year following inclusion
Unprovoked pain change, one year post-treatment
Time Frame: 1 year after end of clinical treatment
Change in self-reported unprovoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and 1 year after completion of clinical treatment.
1 year after end of clinical treatment
Provoked pain change, post-intervention
Time Frame: post-intervention (6 weeks)
Change in self-reported provoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks)
post-intervention (6 weeks)
Provoked pain change, end of clinical treatment
Time Frame: after clinical treatment (typically 10-12 months) or 1 year following inclusion
Change in self-reported provoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and after completion of clinical treatment or 1 year following inclusion.
after clinical treatment (typically 10-12 months) or 1 year following inclusion
Provoked pain change, one year post-treatment
Time Frame: 1 year after ending of clinical treatment
Change in self-reported unprovoked pain assessment, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), between baseline and 1 year after completion of clinical treatment.
1 year after ending of clinical treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with Life change
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Change in satisfaction with Life, assessed with Satisfaction with Life Scale, between baseline and post-intervention (6 weeks)
Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Sexuality
Time Frame: Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Change in sexuality measures, assessed by Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
Baseline to post-intervention (6 weeks)
Number of visits for clinical treatment
Time Frame: One year after the end of clinical treatment
Number of visits for clinical treatment
One year after the end of clinical treatment
Cost-effectiveness, assessed with the EQ-5D scale
Time Frame: Baseline to one year after completion of clinical treatment
Cost-effectiveness, assessed with the EQ-5D scale, from baseline to one year after completion of clinica treatment
Baseline to one year after completion of clinical treatment
Sexual function parameters
Time Frame: Baseline to end of clinical treatment
Change in sexual function parameters, assessed by the Female Sexual Dysfunction Scale (SFDS), between baseline and completion of clinical treatment
Baseline to end of clinical treatment
Number of days off work
Time Frame: Baseline to end of clinical treatment
Baseline to end of clinical treatment
Satisfaction with Life change, one year post-treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to one year post-treatment
Change in satisfaction with Life, assessed with Satisfaction with Life Scale, between baseline and one year after completion of clinical treatment
Baseline to one year post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Uppsala University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alkistis Skalkidou, MD, PhD, Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EMBLA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Study Data/Documents

  1. Study Protocol

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings