Effects of Antiviral Therapy on HBV Reactivation (HBV-DNA(-))

June 8, 2017 updated by: Jian-Hong Zhong, Guangxi Medical University

Effects of Antiviral Therapy on HBV Reactivation and Liver Function After Hepatectomy for HBV-DNA Negative HBV-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation happens after liver resection for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, particularly for those with positive serum HBV-DNA . The incidence rate and risk factors of HBV reactivation after hepatectomy for serum HBV-DNA negative HBV-related HCC are unclear.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation happens after liver resection for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, particularly for those with positive serum HBV-DNA . The incidence rate and risk factors of HBV reactivation after hepatectomy for serum HBV-DNA negative HBV-related HCC are unclear.From July 2012 to December 2015, 174 consecutive patients with serum HBV-DNA negative HBV-related HCC underwent resection were prospectively enrolled in the studied. There are 66 patients received preoperative antiviral therapy (antiviral group) and 108 patients did not receive any antiviral therapy (non-antiviral group). The incidence of HBV reactivation, risk factors of liver function were analyzed in perioperative period. HBV reactivation developed in 30 patients (27.8%) in the non- antiviral group and 2 patients (3.0%) in the antiviral group, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that minor hepatectomy (HR, 4.695; 95% CI, 1.257-17.537, P = 0.021) and without antiviral therapy (HR, 8.164; 95% CI, 1.831-36.397, p =0.006) were risk factors attributed to HBV reactivation. Patients in antiviral group and non-antiviral group or reactivation group and without reactivation group have similar ALT, TBil, ALB, and PT in 7 days after resection. However, patients in antiviral group have significantly better ALT and ALB on day 30th after resection than those in control group. Moreover, similar phenomenon were observed when comparing those with or without HBV reactivation. Resection could lead to HBV reactivation during the perioperative period for serum HBV DNA negative HBV-related HCC, especially in patients who did not receive any antiviral therapy. Anti-HBV therapy can reduce the risk of reactivation, thus improving liver function after hepatectomy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • underwent initial hepatectomy;
  • preoperative serum HBsAg positive
  • serum HBV DNA negative
  • serum ALT in normal range
  • Child-Pugh A liver function
  • HCC was confirmed by histopathology
  • patients in the treated group received Entecavir (ENT) while patients in the control group did not receive any antiviral therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • underwent preoperative TACE or other anti-tumor treatments
  • underwent preoperative antiviral treatment for nearly a year
  • with autoimmune disease, other organ malignant tumor, or other severe disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Entecavir therapy
Patients who received entecavir (zhengda Tianqing Co., Ltd, Lianyungang, Jiangsu Province, China; 0.5 mg/d) were submitted to antiviral group. Patients in the antiviral group received entecavir begin in the first 3 days before surgery for at lest 1 month. No immunological therapy in perioperative period will be submitted to any included patients.
Drug: Entecavir therapy
Patients in the antiviral group received entecavir begin in the first 3 days before surgery for at lest 1 month.
NO_INTERVENTION: No antiviral therapy
Patients who did not receive any antiviral therapies were submitted as non-antiviral group. Patients in the non-antiviral group who underwent HBV reactivation will receive entecavir therapy. No immunological therapy in perioperative period will be submitted to any included patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of HBV reactivation
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
1 month after surgery
HBV reactivation on the recovery of liver function
Time Frame: 1 month after surgery
1 month after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guangxi Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Le-Qun Li, MD, Cancer Hospital of Guangxi Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HBV-DNA(-)/HCC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Study Data/Documents

  1. Clinical Study Report
    Information comments: Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):15047-15056. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14789.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings