Impact of Combined Behavioral Interventions on Cognitive Outcomes in MCI (CBI)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
- UCSD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- MCI diagnosis (can be self referral, will determine eligibility at baseline)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dementia diagnosis
- Head trauma
- Neuro/psychiatric disorders
- Current substance dependence
- Sensory/mobility deficits
- No more than 1 hour of purposeful, aerobic activity/week
- Currently engaging in any other brain-stimulating computer program (No more than 1 hour a week)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Walking Intervention
|
The walking intervention will begin following baseline assessments and will be continued for 12 weeks.
Participants will be given a pedometer to use daily and log their daily steps, with an identified goal of increasing step counts by 3000 steps a day over the course of the intervention.
After obtaining a week long baseline step count, individuals in the intervention group will progressively increase their step counts by 100 steps daily each week for the first three weeks, by 200 steps daily for weeks four through six, by 300 steps daily for weeks seven through nine, and by 400 steps daily for weeks ten through twelve.
Mean baseline step counts for sedentary older adults in our pilot work were 4150 per day; therefore, most participants will almost double their daily activity by the end of the intervention.
|
|
Experimental: Cognitive Training Intervention
|
In the CT condition, participants will use Brain HQ, a computer cognitive training program (Posit Science Corporation, San Francisco, CA), shown to be well tolerated by older adults with positive short- and long-term cognitive outcomes.
Participants will use the program 60 minutes/day, 5 days/week for 12 weeks.
If participants do not have a home computer/internet access, they can complete the modules at another location such as a public library, senior center, or at the MARC, but training will still be self-directed.
|
|
Experimental: Combined Intervention
|
The combined condition will concurrently follow both the walking and the CT programs as described above.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test (RBMT) is an ecologically valid assessment of cognitive functioning that tests some skills specifically trained in the CT condition (e.g., name learning, and story learning) but also additional untrained skills such as prospective memory.
Belongings subtest scaled scores: Minimum score = 1, Maximum score = 19; higher values represent better performance.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Everyday Cognition Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog) assesses (via informant report) everyday cognitive functioning in memory, language, visuospatial, and executive functioning domains.
Average total score was used: Minimum = 1, Maximum = 4, higher scores indicate greater impairment
|
12 weeks
|
|
Older Peoples Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Self report assessment of quality of life specific to older adults.
Assessment covers life overall, health, social relationships and participation, independence, control over life and freedom, home and neighborhood, psychological and emotional well-being, financial circumstances, leisure/activities, and culture and religion.
Total score minimum = 35, max = 175; lower scores indicate better quality of life.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy Jak, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NPSASA-14-321959
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.