YAG Vitreolysis for Floaters

September 12, 2016 updated by: Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of YAG Vitreolysis Versus Sham for Symptomatic Weiss Ring Due to Posterior Vitreous Detachment

This is a single-center, prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of YAG vitreolysis versus sham for symptomatic Weiss ring due to posterior vitreous detachment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

52 subjects will be enrolled in the trial and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either YAG laser vitreolysis or sham laser for symptomatic Weiss ring due to posterior vitreous detachment. Subjects will follow up at one week, one month, three months, and six months after the procedure. Assessments will include a questionnaire regarding duration of floater symptoms prior to presentation, severity of floater symptoms, number of floaters, and activity most inconvenienced by presence of floaters; Medical, ocular history and demographics collected; ETDRS and Snellen visual acuity; Optos color photography; Heidelberg Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and infrared photo; B scan ultrasound of Weiss ring with caliper measurement of nearest distance between Weiss ring and retina, Weiss ring and posterior lens capsule (only in phakic eyes); Slit lamp and indirect ophthalmoscopy with scleral depression of study eye; Applanation tonometry; Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ 25). Qualitative change in Optos photography will evaluated by a masked physician.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
52

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptoms of floaters that correlate to the presence of a posterior vitreous detachment for at least 6 months
  2. Documented posterior vitreous detachment on clinical examination, OCT, and B scan
  3. Self-rating of visual disturbance by the floaters must be at least 4 on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being no symptoms to 10 being debilitating symptoms.
  4. Symptomatic Weiss ring (PVD) must be at least 3 mm away from the retina and 5 mm from the posterior lens capsule of the crystalline lens, as measured on B-scan. For pseudophakic patients, there is no minimum required distance from the intraocular lens.
  5. Able to position for the YAG laser procedure.
  6. Accept the risks of YAG laser including but not limited to retinal detachment, intraocular hemorrhage, retinal damage, cataract formation, optic nerve damage, inflammation, and irreversible loss of vision.
  7. Willing and able to comply with clinic visits and study-related procedures
  8. If the patient has two symptomatic eyes, only one eye can be randomized and included in the study.
  9. Provide signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Snellen best corrected visual acuity worse than 20/50 in the fellow eye
  2. History of retinal tear, retinal detachment, or uveitis in the study eye
  3. History of diabetic retinopathy, macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, or aphakia in the study eye
  4. History of glaucoma or high intraocular pressure defined as having a history of glaucoma surgery or currently taking two or more topical glaucoma medications in the study eye

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: YAG vitreolysis
A Karickoff lens with goniosol will be used to perform the YAG vitreolysis. The number of shots will be determined at the discretion of the treating physician. A focus offset may be used at investigator discretion. Single shot mode will be used. The maximum energy per pulse will be 7 mJ. The endpoint of treatment is the vaporization of the Weiss ring into gas, as well as the disruption of it into smaller fragments as well as any other vitreous opacities deemed visually significant by the treating physician. Only one treatment session will be performed.
Procedure: YAG vitreolysis
Sham Comparator: Sham YAG vitreolysis
Sham laser treatment will be applied under the same procedure used for laser treatment but by turning the laser power down to 0.3 mJ and using a separate lens covered by a filter that absorbs the power, so no laser enters the eye.
Procedure: YAG vitreolysis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective improvement in floater symptoms
Time Frame: 6 Months
Questionnaire which asks: "Please rate your visual disturbance by the floaters on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being no symptoms to 10 being debilitating symptoms," "Please quantify your post-operative improvement as a percentage," and "How would you describe your floaters today compared to right before the laser procedure?"
6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 6 Months
Mean change in visual acuity from Baseline as measured by ETDRS vision testing at 6 months
6 Months
VFQ-25 Near Activities
Time Frame: 6 Months
Mean change in baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) near activities subscale
6 Months
VFQ-25 Distance Activities
Time Frame: 6 Months
Mean change in baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) distance activities subscale
6 Months
Qualitative changes on infrared and color photography
Time Frame: 6 Months
Qualitative changes on infrared and color photography
6 Months
Incidence and severity of ocular and systemic adverse events
Time Frame: 6 Months
Incidence and severity of ocular and systemic adverse events
6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Chirag P Shah, MD, MPH, Attending physician

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 12, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • YAG-001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings