Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

January 31, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) Delivered Via a SelfDose (TM) Device in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, usability, and acceptability of guselkumab delivered using SelfDose device in participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
78

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3R 6A7
        • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1Y2
        • Dermatrials Research
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4Y 4C5
        • DermEdge Research
  • Poland
      • Bialystok, Poland, 15 351
        • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85 094
        • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im Dr A Jurasza
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 51-685
        • Wromedica Irena Bielicka, Janusz Szczepanik S.C.
  • United States
    • Florida
      • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34470
        • Renstar Medical Research
    • Illinois
      • Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States, 60008
        • Arlington Dermatology
    • Indiana
      • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
        • Indiana Clinical Trial Center
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
        • Dermatology Specialists
    • Michigan
      • Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States, 48059
        • Hamzavi Dermatology
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
    • Rhode Island
      • Johnston, Rhode Island, United States, 02919
        • Clinical Partners
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502
        • Virginia Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and at Week 0
  • Before randomization, a woman must be either: a) Not of childbearing potential: premenarchal; postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months or any age with amenorrhea for at least 6 months and a serum follicle-stimulating hormone level (FSH) >40 International Units Per Liter [IU/L]); permanently sterile (example, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy); or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, b) Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of birth control, consistent with local regulations regarding the use of birth control methods for subjects participating in clinical studies: example, established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal foam/gel/ film/cream/suppository (if available in their locale); male partner sterilization (the vasectomized partner should be the sole partner for that participant); true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant)
  • Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
  • Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to [>=] 12 at screening and at baseline
  • Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >= 10 percent (%) at screening and at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
  • Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
  • Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >3 months before the first administration of study drug)
  • Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
  • Has received any anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) biologic therapy within 3 months before the first administration of study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 1 (Guselkumab: Placebo)
Participants will receive 100 milligram (mg) guselkumab administered as a 100 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) solution in a single-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled in a SelfDose device at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28; liquid placebo for guselkumab 100 mg at Week 16 to maintain the study blind.
Drug: Guselkumab
Participants will receive 100 mg of Guselkumab as 100 mg/mL solution via SelfDose device.
Other Names:
  • CNTO 1959
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo supplied in a PFS assembled in a SelfDose device.
Experimental: Group 2 (Placebo: Guselkumab)
Partcipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, and 28.
Drug: Guselkumab
Participants will receive 100 mg of Guselkumab as 100 mg/mL solution via SelfDose device.
Other Names:
  • CNTO 1959
Drug: Placebo
Participants will receive matching placebo supplied in a PFS assembled in a SelfDose device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. Participants who discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, an adverse event (AE) of worsening of psoriasis, or who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy during study that could improve psoriasis were considered as treatment failures for the study.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent (%) to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) were considered IGA cleared responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 100 Response at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with 100% improvement in PASI from baseline (PASI score=0) were considered PASI 100 responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Mild or Better (Less Than or Equal to [<=] 2) at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 50 Response and a PASI 75 Response at Week 16
Time Frame: Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with >=50% and >= 75% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders respectively. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.
Week 16
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 16
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received.
Baseline and Week 16
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score Through Week 40
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended every 8 weeks [q8w] dosing interval)
The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended every 8 weeks [q8w] dosing interval)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 40
Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders while those achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Responses, PASI 90 Responses, PASI 75 Responses, and PASI 50 Responses
Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and >= 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR108203
  • CNTO1959PSO3006 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2016-002022-37 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Guselkumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings