Efficacy and Safety Study of Guselkumab in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of CNTO 1959 (Guselkumab) Delivered Via a SelfDose (TM) Device in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, usability, and acceptability of guselkumab delivered using SelfDose device in participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Psoriasis
• Intervention / Treatment: Drug: Guselkumab; Drug: Placebo

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 78
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • British Columbia
    • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3R 6A7
      • Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
  • Ontario
    • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 1Y2
      • Dermatrials Research
    • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4Y 4C5
      • DermEdge Research
• Poland
  • Bialystok, Poland, 15 351
    • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz i Jerzy Supronik
  • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85 094
    • Szpital Uniwersytecki nr 1 im Dr A Jurasza
  • Wroclaw, Poland, 51-685
    • Wromedica Irena Bielicka, Janusz Szczepanik S.C.
• United States
  • Florida
    • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34470
      • Renstar Medical Research
  • Illinois
    • Rolling Meadows, Illinois, United States, 60008
      • Arlington Dermatology
  • Indiana
    • Plainfield, Indiana, United States, 46168
      • Indiana Clinical Trial Center
  • Kentucky
    • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40241
      • Dermatology Specialists
  • Michigan
    • Fort Gratiot, Michigan, United States, 48059
      • Hamzavi Dermatology
  • Pennsylvania
    • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
      • University of Pittsburgh Department of Dermatology
  • Rhode Island
    • Johnston, Rhode Island, United States, 02919
      • Clinical Partners
  • Virginia
    • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23502
      • Virginia Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin) at screening and at Week 0
• Before randomization, a woman must be either: a) Not of childbearing potential: premenarchal; postmenopausal (greater than [>] 45 years of age with amenorrhea for at least 12 months or any age with amenorrhea for at least 6 months and a serum follicle-stimulating hormone level (FSH) >40 International Units Per Liter [IU/L]); permanently sterile (example, tubal occlusion, hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy); or otherwise be incapable of pregnancy, b) Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of birth control, consistent with local regulations regarding the use of birth control methods for subjects participating in clinical studies: example, established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception; placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS); barrier methods: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) plus spermicidal foam/gel/ film/cream/suppository (if available in their locale); male partner sterilization (the vasectomized partner should be the sole partner for that participant); true abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant)
• Agree not to receive a Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccination during the study, or within 12 months after the last administration of study drug
• Have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) greater than or equal to [>=] 12 at screening and at baseline
• Have an involved body surface area (BSA) >= 10 percent (%) at screening and at baseline

Exclusion Criteria:

• Has unstable cardiovascular disease, defined as a recent clinical deterioration (eg, unstable angina, rapid atrial fibrillation) in the last 3 months or a cardiac hospitalization within the last 3 months
• Has a history of lymphoproliferative disease, including lymphoma; a history of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); or signs and symptoms suggestive of possible lymphoproliferative disease, such as lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly
• Has a transplanted organ (with exception of a corneal transplant >3 months before the first administration of study drug)
• Has a nonplaque form of psoriasis (example, erythrodermic, guttate, or pustular)
• Has received any anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) biologic therapy within 3 months before the first administration of study drug

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 (Guselkumab: Placebo); Participants will receive 100 milligram (mg) guselkumab administered as a 100 milligram per milliliter (mg/mL) solution in a single-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled in a SelfDose device at Weeks 0, 4, 12, 20, and 28; liquid placebo for guselkumab 100 mg at Week 16 to maintain the study blind.	Drug: Guselkumab; Participants will receive 100 mg of Guselkumab as 100 mg/mL solution via SelfDose device.; Other Names: CNTO 1959; Drug: Placebo; Participants will receive matching placebo supplied in a PFS assembled in a SelfDose device.
Experimental: Group 2 (Placebo: Guselkumab); Partcipants will receive placebo at Weeks 0, 4, and 12 followed by guselkumab 100 mg at Weeks 16, 20, and 28.	Drug: Guselkumab; Participants will receive 100 mg of Guselkumab as 100 mg/mL solution via SelfDose device.; Other Names: CNTO 1959; Drug: Placebo; Participants will receive matching placebo supplied in a PFS assembled in a SelfDose device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) at Week 16	The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure. Participants who discontinued study drug due to lack of efficacy, an adverse event (AE) of worsening of psoriasis, or who started a protocol-prohibited medication/therapy during study that could improve psoriasis were considered as treatment failures for the study.	Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 Response at Week 16	The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90 percent (%) to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. A PASI 90 response represents participants who achieved at least a 90 percent improvement from baseline in the PASI score. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.	Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an IGA Score of Cleared (0) at Week 16	The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) were considered IGA cleared responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.	Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 100 Response at Week 16	The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with 100% improvement in PASI from baseline (PASI score=0) were considered PASI 100 responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.	Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Mild or Better (Less Than or Equal to [<=] 2) at Week 16	The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participants psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.	Week 16
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve a PASI 50 Response and a PASI 75 Response at Week 16	The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants with >=50% and >= 75% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50 and PASI 75 responders respectively. Non-responder imputation (counted as non-responders) was applied for participants who met treatment failure rules, as well as for remaining missing data after treatment failure.	Week 16
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score at Week 16	The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received.	Baseline and Week 16
Percent Improvement From Baseline in PASI Score Through Week 40	The PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In the PASI system, the body is divided into 4 regions: the head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. The PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72. A higher score indicates more severe disease. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.	Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended every 8 weeks [q8w] dosing interval)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an IGA Score of Cleared (0), Cleared (0) or Minimal (1) and Mild or Better (<=2) Through Week 40	The IGA documents the investigator's assessment of the participant's psoriasis at a given time point. Overall lesions are graded for induration, erythema, and scaling. The participant's psoriasis is assessed as cleared (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Participants who achieved an IGA score of cleared (0) or minimal (1) were considered IGA cleared or minimal responders while those achieved an IGA score of cleared (0), minimal (1), or mild (2) were considered IGA mild or better responders. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.	Week 4, 8, 12, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved PASI 100 Responses, PASI 90 Responses, PASI 75 Responses, and PASI 50 Responses	PASI is a system used for assessing and grading the severity of psoriatic lesions and their response to therapy. In PASI system, body is divided into 4 regions: head, trunk, upper extremities, and lower extremities. Each of these areas is assessed separately for the percentage of the area involved, which translates to a numeric score that ranges from 0 (indicates no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement), and for erythema, induration, and scaling, which are each rated on a scale of 0 to 4. PASI produces a numeric score that can range from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72.Participants with >=50%, >= 75%, >=90% and >= 100% improvement in PASI from baseline were considered PASI 50, 75, 90 and PASI 100 responders, respectively. Participants were analyzed according to the assigned treatment to which they were randomized, regardless of the treatment they actually received. From week 20, participants in placebo group, only included participants who crossed over to receive guselkumab at week 16.	Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, and Week 40 (4 weeks beyond the recommended q8w dosing interval)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
• Investigators: Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Ferris LK, Ott E, Jiang J, Hong HC, Li S, Han C, Baran W. Efficacy and safety of guselkumab, administered with a novel patient-controlled injector (One-Press), for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: results from the phase 3 ORION study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Mar;31(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1587145. Epub 2019 Mar 19.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 28, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 6, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): February 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 14, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 14, 2016
• First Posted (Estimated): September 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 25, 2025
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 31, 2025
• Last Verified: January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous; Skin Diseases; Psoriasis
• Other Study ID Numbers: CR108203; CNTO1959PSO3006 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC); 2016-002022-37 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: Yes
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No