Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Efficacy in Achieving Total Knee Pain Reduction Trial
GREAT Knee Pain Reduction Trial, Genicular Radiofrequency Ablation Efficacy in Achieving Total Knee Pain Reduction Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Surgical candidate for total knee arthroplasty secondary to osteoarthritis
- Radiologic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-4)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Worst knee pain score on day of evaluation <4/10
- Already taking opioids >100 mg/day of morphine equivalent dose
- Infectious etiology (over RFA insertion site or systemic)
- Workers compensation
- History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or contrast
- History of intraarticular injection in the last 6 weeks with steroids or hyaluronic acids
- Prior total knee arthroplasty
- Prior open knee surgery or ligament reconstruction
- Prior RFA of knee joint
- Connective tissue diseases affecting the knee
- Sciatic pain
- Pacemaker
- Pregnancy
- Severe medical disease
- Serious neurological disorders
- Serious psychiatric disorders
- Suicidal or homicidal ideation
- BMI>50
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: RFA Group
A genicular nerve RFA will be performed prior to planned total knee arthroplasty.
|
Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target locations based on boney landmarks of the superior lateral (SL), superior medial (SM), and inferior medial (IL) branches of the genicular nerve will be determined.
RFA probes will be placed and connected to the RFA generator and the generator is activated.
The RFA is performed.
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control Group
A sham genicular nerve RFA will be performed prior to planned total knee arthroplasty.
|
Under fluoroscopic guidance, the target locations based on boney landmarks of the superior lateral (SL), superior medial (SM), and inferior medial (IL) branches of the genicular nerve will be determined.
The RFA probes for the control group will not be connected to the RFA generator (no neurotomy); however, the generator will still be activated to mimic the RFA group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of pain score at rest
Time Frame: On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 1 and 2, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52.
|
Pain score at rest using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
|
On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 1 and 2, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52.
|
|
Comparison of pain score with ambulation
Time Frame: On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 1 and 2, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52.
|
Pain score with ambulation using an 11-point Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS)
|
On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, on postoperative day 1 and 2, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of PROMIS physical function score
Time Frame: On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
Physical function assessment using the PROMIS physical function score
|
On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
|
Comparison of PROMIS global health score
Time Frame: On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
Global health assessment using the PROMIS global health score
|
On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
|
Comparison of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Joint Replacement Score (KOOS JR)
Time Frame: On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
Outcome assessment using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Joint Replacement Score (KOOS JR)
|
On the day of genicular nerve RFA or sham procedure, preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
|
Comparison of 7-point Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: Preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
Assessment of the subject's belief about the efficacy of treatment using the PGIC.
|
Preoperatively on the day of surgery, and at week 2, 6, 24, and 52
|
|
Comparison of Mobility using Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and postoperative day 1
|
Assessment of mobility using the TUG test
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and postoperative day 1
|
|
Comparison of Depression assessment using Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure and at 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Screening for depression using the CES-D
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure and at 6 weeks postoperatively
|
|
Comparison of Total opioid use in morphine equivalents
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, day of surgery, post op dy 1 and 2, and at weeks 2,6 postoperatively
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, day of surgery, post op dy 1 and 2, and at weeks 2,6 postoperatively
|
|
|
Assessment of pain location using Michigan Body Map
Time Frame: Day of genicular nerve RFA
|
Day of genicular nerve RFA
|
|
|
Assessment of pain catastrophizing using Catastrophizing General Chronic Pain (CAT) Scale
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure
|
|
|
Comparison of quadriceps strength
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and at weeks 2 and 6 postoperatively
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and at weeks 2 and 6 postoperatively
|
|
|
Comparison Range of Motion - Knee
Time Frame: Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and at weeks 2 and 6 postoperatively
|
Day of genicular RFA or sham procedure, and at weeks 2 and 6 postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Puneet Mishra, MD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wylde V, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID, Dieppe P. Persistent pain after joint replacement: prevalence, sensory qualities, and postoperative determinants. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):566-572. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.023. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Choi WJ, Hwang SJ, Song JG, Leem JG, Kang YU, Park PH, Shin JW. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2011 Mar;152(3):481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
- Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
- Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen O, Rasmussen S. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1597-606. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467.
- Singh JA, Vessely MB, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Melton LJ 3rd, Kurland RL, Berry DJ. A population-based study of trends in the use of total hip and total knee arthroplasty, 1969-2008. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Oct;85(10):898-904. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0115. Epub 2010 Sep 7.
- Lenguerrand E, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Sayers A, Brunton L, Beswick AD, Dieppe P, Blom AW. Trajectories of Pain and Function after Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: The ADAPT Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 12;11(2):e0149306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149306. eCollection 2016.
- Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Are outcomes after total knee arthroplasty worsening over time? A time-trends study of activity limitation and pain outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 17;15:440. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-440.
- Wylde V, Dieppe P, Hewlett S, Learmonth ID. Total knee replacement: is it really an effective procedure for all? Knee. 2007 Dec;14(6):417-23. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
- Grosu I, Lavand'homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1744-58. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2750-2. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
- Beswick AD, Wylde V, Gooberman-Hill R, Blom A, Dieppe P. What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients. BMJ Open. 2012 Feb 22;2(1):e000435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435. Print 2012.
- Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):148-52. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32767.
- Wylde V, Rooker J, Halliday L, Blom A. Acute postoperative pain at rest after hip and knee arthroplasty: severity, sensory qualities and impact on sleep. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
- Srikandarajah S, Gilron I. Systematic review of movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and meta-analyses: a fundamental distinction requiring standardized measurement. Pain. 2011 Aug;152(8):1734-1739. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.02.008. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
- Puolakka PA, Rorarius MG, Roviola M, Puolakka TJ, Nordhausen K, Lindgren L. Persistent pain following knee arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 May;27(5):455-60. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335b31c.
- Karaman H, Tufek A, Kavak GO, Yildirim ZB, Uysal E, Celik F, Kaya S. Intra-articularly applied pulsed radiofrequency can reduce chronic knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis. J Chin Med Assoc. 2011 Aug;74(8):336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
- Mishra P, Edwards D, Huntoon M, Sobey C, Polkowski G, Corey J, Mishra KL, Shinar A, Engstrom S, Palmer C, Bruehl S. Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Sep;46(9):752-756. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102501. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 160663
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.