Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations With Different Adhesive Systems. Randomized Clinical Trials.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Paulo Vinícius Soares, DDS, MS, PHD
- Phone Number: +55 34 991615642
- Email: paulovsaores@yahoo.com.br
Study Locations
-
-
Minas Gerais
-
Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 381440617
- Recruiting
- Federal University of Uberlândia
-
Contact:
- Paulo V Soares, DDS, MS, PHD
- Phone Number: +55 34 991615642
- Email: paulovsoares@yahoo.com.br
-
Contact:
- Alexandre C Machado, DDS, MS
- Phone Number: +55 34 99133 5399
- Email: alexandrecoelhomachado@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy volunteers; both genres; presence of at least four non carious cervical lesions of similar dimensions in the same arc and opposite quadrants; good oral hygiene.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of cavities, cracks or enamel fractures; extensive or unsatisfactory restorations; recent restorations involving the labial surface; dentures or orthodontics; presence of periodontal disease and,or parafunctional habits; systemic disease and, or severe psychological; constant use of analgesic and, or anti-inflammatory or allergic response to dental products.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Retraction and total-etch
Gingival displacement with a gingival cord (#0, #00 or #000) prior to the restoration.
Application of total-etch adhesive system: enamel and dentin etched with 35% phosphoric acid, wash, dry, two layers of primer/bond application with a brush and photoactivated for 20 seconds.
|
Gingival displacement with a gingival cord (#0, #00 or #000) with specific spatula.
Enamel and dentin etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 30 and 15 seconds, respectively.
Wash and dry with absorbent paper.
Two layers of pirmer/bond on enamel and dentin with a brush.
Photoactivated for 20 seconds
|
|
Active Comparator: No retraction and total-etch
Application of total-etch adhesive system: enamel and dentin etched with 35% phosphoric acid, wash, dry, two layers of primer/bond application with a brush and photoactivated for 20 seconds.
|
Enamel and dentin etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 30 and 15 seconds, respectively.
Wash and dry with absorbent paper.
Two layers of pirmer/bond on enamel and dentin with a brush.
Photoactivated for 20 seconds
|
|
Active Comparator: Retraction and self-conditioning
Gingival displacement with a gingival cord (#0, #00 or #000) prior to the restoration.
Application of self-conditioning adhesive system: selective enamel etched with 35% phosphoric acid, wash, dry, one layer of acid/pirmer on enamel and dentin with a brush, one layer of bond with a brush and photoactivated for 20 seconds.
|
Gingival displacement with a gingival cord (#0, #00 or #000) with specific spatula.
Wash and dry with absorbent paper.
Photoactivated for 20 seconds
Selective enamel etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds.
One layer of acid/pirmer on enamel and dentin with a brush following to one layer of bond with a brush.
|
|
Active Comparator: No retraction and self-conditioning
Application of self-conditioning adhesive system: selective enamel etched with 35% phosphoric acid, wash, dry, one layer of acid/pirmer on enamel and dentin with a brush, one layer of bond with a brush and photoactivated for 20 seconds.
|
Wash and dry with absorbent paper.
Photoactivated for 20 seconds
Selective enamel etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds.
One layer of acid/pirmer on enamel and dentin with a brush following to one layer of bond with a brush.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Success rate of noncarious cervical lesions restorations according to the World Dental Federation criterion
Time Frame: 36 mounths
|
Evaluate the success rate of NCCL restoration with a 36 mounths follow up
|
36 mounths
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Soares PV, Machado AC, Zeola LF, Souza PG, Galvao AM, Montes TC, Pereira AG, Reis BR, Coleman TA, Grippo JO. Loading and composite restoration assessment of various non-carious cervical lesions morphologies - 3D finite element analysis. Aust Dent J. 2015 Sep;60(3):309-16. doi: 10.1111/adj.12233.
- Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012 Feb;24(1):10-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
- Ritter AV, Grippo JO, Coleman TA, Morgan ME. Prevalence of carious and non-carious cervical lesions in archaeological populations from North America and Europe. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2009;21(5):324-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2009.00285.x.
- Michael JA, Townsend GC, Greenwood LF, Kaidonis JA. Abfraction: separating fact from fiction. Aust Dent J. 2009 Mar;54(1):2-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.01080.x.
- Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Lisboa AH, Higashi C, Queiroz VA, Rego RO, Reis A. Influence of Isolation Method of the Operative Field on Gingival Damage, Patients' Preference, and Restoration Retention in Noncarious Cervical Lesions. Oper Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):581-93. doi: 10.2341/14-089-C. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
- Kim SY, Lee KW, Seong SR, Lee MA, Lee IB, Son HH, Kim HY, Oh MH, Cho BH. Two-year clinical effectiveness of adhesives and retention form on resin composite restorations of non-carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):507-15. doi: 10.2341/08-006C.
- Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014 Oct;30(10):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CAAE - 57032016.0.0000.5152
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.