Safety and Tumoricidal Effect of Low Dose Foscan PDT in Patients With Inoperable Bile Duct Cancers (PDT)

August 20, 2023 updated by: James Yun-wong Lau, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Safety and Tumoricidal Effect of Low Dose Temoporfin Photodynamic Therapy in Patients With Inoperable Bile Duct Cancers (Foscan® Study)

In this study, we hope to evaluate the safety of PDT using temoporfin plus endoscopic stents in patients with inoperable bile duct cancers. In addition as a preliminary study we sought to determine if the treatment can reduce tumor volume in the short term.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cholangiocarcinoma is a tumor associated with a grave prognosis. The only curative treatment is surgery or liver transplantation. Only about 10-20% of patients with the tumor are operated upon. In the majority of patients, the tumor is often diagnosed at a late stage. Many patients are not operated upon owing to their advanced age or comorbid illnesses. These patients suffer from intense pruritus a result of obstructive jaundice, recurrent biliary sepsis and progressive hepatic failure leading to death. Quality in life in these patients is poor. The median survival in these patients is around 6 months. The palliative treatment is stents inserted either at ERCP or through a percutaneous transhepatic route. Many return with recurrent cholangitis necessitating frequent stent changes. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in combination with stenting is the only proven treatment that confers a survival benefit when compared to stenting alone. Two randomized controlled trials have shown significant survival advantage in patients treated by PDT in addition to stenting compared to stenting alone. Ortner et al. 1 randomized 39 patients with inoperable cholangiocarinoma to endoscopic stents with or without PDT. Median survival in those given PDT was 493 days compared to that of 98 days in those with stents alone. Survival difference was again wide in favor of PDT use in another randomized controlled study by Zoepf et al 2 (median survival 630 vs. 210 days). In addition, PDT improves quality of life and cholestasis in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. In a series from Germany, survival after PDT and stenting compared favorably to R1 and R2 resections. 3 Despite of the evidence, PDT for inoperable cholangiocarcinoma is not available in Hong Kong.

Meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC, Foscan®) is a photosensitizer for PDT in cholangiocarcinoma. In compared with other agents such as Photofin and Photosan, PDT treatment using temoporfin at a low dose (3 mg per treatment) is associated with a deeper tissue penetration (4-6mm) and a reduced period of photosensitivity.

In this study, we hope to evaluate the safety of PDT using temoporfin plus endoscopic stents in patients with inoperable bile duct cancers. In addition as a preliminary study we sought to determine if the treatment can reduce tumor volume in the short term.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
    • N.t.
      • Shatin, N.t., Hong Kong
        • Endoscopy Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with inoperable cholangiocarcinoma belonging to all Bismuth Corlette classification.
  • Karnofsky index >30%
  • Satisfactory relief of jaundice (serum bilirubin < 100µmol/L) with biliary prostheses inserted either at ERCP or via percutaneous transhepatic routes.
  • Absence of biliary sepsis
  • Age 18-80
  • Provision of written consent
  • No evidence of metastatic disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Porphyria
  • Previous inserted metallic biliary stents
  • Refusal to provide a written consent.
  • Moribund from disseminated disease or comorbidities
  • Pregnant or lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Foscan
A single treatment with Temoporfin (Foscan) 3 mg given intravenously followed by PDT with laser light at 652 nm (Ceralas, Biolitec, Germany) within 72 hours
Drug: Temoporfin
A single treatment with Temoporfin (Foscan) 3 mg given intravenously followed by PDT with laser light at 652 nm (Ceralas, Biolitec, Germany) within 72 hours
Other Names:
  • Foscan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety (will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0)
Time Frame: 10 years
Safety (will be graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response as categorized by the World Health Organization criteria at 8 weeks as assessed by ERCP and Intraduct ultrasound
Time Frame: 10 years
Tumor response as categorized by the World Health Organization criteria at 8
10 years
Relief of jaundice at 8 weeks (<50% pretreatment serum bilirubin)
Time Frame: 10 years
Relief of jaundice at 8 weeks (<50% pretreatment serum bilirubin)
10 years
Cholangitis and stent occlusions requiring stent change (will be assessed based on blood tests and ERCP findings)
Time Frame: 10 years
Cholangitis and stent occlusions requiring stent change (will be assessed based on blood tests and ERCP findings)
10 years
Quality of life (in every visit, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30] will be filled and specific symptom enquiry is made; itchiness, fever and general well-being over a Likert 0-4 scale.
Time Frame: 10 years
Quality of life (in every visit, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire [EORTC QLQ-C30] will be filled and specific symptom enquiry is made; itchiness, fever and general well-being over a Likert 0-4 scale.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese University of Hong Kong

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: James YW LAU, MD, CUHK

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 28, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Foscan

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings