Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia and Long-term Outcome

July 6, 2020 updated by: Dong-Xin Wang, Peking University First Hospital

Impact of Epidural Anesthesia-analgesia on Long-term Outcome in Elderly Patients After Surgery: 5-year Follow-up of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Surgical resection is one of the most important treatments for resectable cancer; on the other hand, cancer recurrence and/or metastasis are the major reasons of treatment failure. The development of recurrence/metastasis after cancer surgery mostly depends on the balance between the immunity of human body and the capability of implantation, proliferation and neovascularization of the residual cancer. Preclinical and retrospective clinical studies suggest that anaesthetic management may affect the long-term outcomes after cancer surgery. The investigators hypothesize that use of epidural anesthesia-analgesia may improve long-term survival in elderly patients after major surgery for cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Surgical resection is the main treatment for potentially curable solid organ cancer. However, it is unavoidable that some cancer cells are disseminated into the circulatory or lymphatic system during surgery. And quite a number of patients develop cancer recurrence and/or metastasis after surgery, which are associated with poor long-term outcomes. The development of cancer recurrence and/or metastasis after surgery is mostly dependent on the balance between the anti-tumor immune function of the human body and the ability of implantation, proliferation and neovascularization of the residual cancer cells.

Multiple surgical factors may influence the balance between the anti-cancer immune function and cancer recurrence. For example, the presence of the primary cancer inhibits angiogenesis, whereas cancer resection eliminates this safeguard against angiogenesis; surgical manipulation releases cancer cells into the circulation; surgery-related stress response inhibits natural killer (NK) cell activity and can promote the development of cancer metastasis; local and systemic release of growth factors during surgery may also promote cancer recurrence both locally and at distant sites.

Available studies showed that general anaesthesia/anesthetics may influence the cellular immune function and long-term outcomes. For example, it was found that ketamine and thiopental, but not propofol, suppressed NK cell activity; all three drugs caused a significant reduction in NK cell number; isoflurane and halothane inhibit interferon (IFN) stimulation of NK cell cytotoxicity; nitrous oxide interferes with DNA, purine, and thymidylate synthesis and depresses neutrophil chemotaxis; opioids have been reported to suppress cell-mediated and humoral immunity.

Considering the potential harmful effects of general anesthesia/anesthetics, there is an increasing interest on the effect of regional anaesthesia. Retrospective studies investigating the relationship between epidural anesthesia and outcome after cancer surgery gave different results. In a meta-analysis, regional anesthesia is associated with improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.96, P = 0.013), but not cancer recurrence/metastasis (HR 0.88, 95% Cl 0.64-1.22, P = 0.457). The investigators hypothesize that combined use of epidural anesthesia may produce favorable effects on the long-term survival in elderly patients undergoing major cancer surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1802

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • Peking University People's Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100730
        • Beijing Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, China, 100038
        • Beijing Shijitan Hospital
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100034
        • Peking University First Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elderly patients (age 60-90 years);
  • Scheduled to undergo noncardiac thoracic or abdominal surgery with an expected duration of 2 hours or longer. For those who undergo thoracoscopic or laparoscopic surgery, the expected length of incision must be 5 centimeters or more;
  • Agree to receive patient-controlled postoperative analgesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuse to participate;
  • Previous history of schizophrenia, epilepsy or Parkinson disease, or unable to complete preoperative assessment due to severe dementia, language barrier or end-stage disease;
  • History of myocardial infarction or stroke within 3 months before surgery;
  • Presence of any contraindication to epidural anesthesia and analgesia, including abnormal vertebral anatomy, previous spinal trauma or surgery, severe chronic back pain, coagulation disorder (prothrombin time or activated partial prothrombin time longer than 1.5 times of the upper normal limit, or platelet count of less than 80 * 10^9/L), local infection near the site of puncture, and severe sepsis;
  • Severe heart dysfunction (New York Heart Association functional classification 3 or above), severe hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh grade C), or severe renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of 442 umol/L or above, with or without serum potassium of 6.5 mmol/L or above, or requirement of renal replacement therapy);
  • Any other conditions that are considered unsuitable for study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Combined epidural-general anesthesia
Patients assigned to this group (experimental group) receive combined epidural-general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia.
Drug: Combined epidural-general anesthesia
Combined epidural-general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia. General anesthesia is performed as that in the general anesthesia group. Epidural anesthesia is performed with ropivacaine. Epidural analgesia is performed with a mixture of ropivacaine and sufentanil.
Other Names:
  • Combined epidural-general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: General anesthesia
Patients assigned to this group (control group) receive general anesthesia and postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.
Drug: General anesthesia
General anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia. General anesthesia is performed with propofol induction and propofol and/or sevoflurane maintenance. Intravenous analgesia is performed with morphine.
Other Names:
  • General anesthesia and postoperative intravenous analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of all-cause death.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event-free survival after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the first date of cancer recurrence/metastasis, new onset cancer, new serious non-cancer disease, or death from any cause.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Cancer-specific survival after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of cancer-specific death. Patients who die from other causes will be censored at the time of death.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Recurrence-free survival after surgery.
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of cancer recurrence/metastasis or all-cause death, whichever come first.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival after surgery (cancer patients).
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of all-cause death.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Event-free survival after surgery (cancer patients).
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the first date of cancer recurrence/metastasis, new onset cancer, new serious non-cancer disease, or death from any cause.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Cognitive function (3-year survivors).
Time Frame: At the end of the 3rd year after surgery.
Cognitive function is assessed with the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-m; a 12-item questionnaire that assesses global cognitive function by verbal communication via telephone. The score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher score indicating better function).
At the end of the 3rd year after surgery.
Cancer-specific survival after surgery (cancer patients).
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of cancer-specific death. Patients who die from other causes will be censored at the time of death.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Recurrence-free survival after surgery (cancer patients).
Time Frame: Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Time from surgery to the date of cancer recurrence/metastasis or all-cause death, whichever come first.
Up to median 5 years after surgery.
Quality of life (3-year survivors).
Time Frame: At the end of the 3rd year after surgery.
Quality of life is assessed with the World Health Organization Quality of Life-brief version (WHOQOL-BREF; a 24-item questionnaire that assesses the quality of life in physical, psychological, social relationship and environmental domains. The score ranges from 0 to 100 for each domain, with higher score indicating better function).
At the end of the 3rd year after surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University First Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Peking University
Peking University People's Hospital
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing Hospital
Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dong-Xin Wang, MD, Peking University First Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 31, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PUCRP201101-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be provided on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elderly

Clinical Trials on Combined epidural-general anesthesia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings