Effect of Information About the Benefits and Harms of Mammography on Women's Decision Making (InforMa)

April 2, 2021 updated by: Montserrat Rue, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida

The Effect of Receiving Information About the Benefits and Harms of Mammography Screening on Women's Decision Making

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of receiving information about the benefits and harms of mammography screening on informed choice, decisional conflict, intention to participate in the Early Detection of Breast Cancer Program (EDBCP), and satisfaction. The primary outcome is informed choice about breast screening (adequate knowledge, and consistency between attitudes and intentions). The sample of participants is composed by 400 women from Catalonia and the Canary Islands (Spain) who will receive their first invitation to participate in the EDBCP of the Public Health Service in a period of 2-4 months.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The selected women will receive a letter of invitation with information about the study. In the following 1-2 weeks they will receive a phone call to confirm that they have received the mailed letter and to assess the inclusion criteria. If they agree to participate in the study, they will be asked for informed consent. All the participants will receive a first questionnaire, the pre-intervention survey (10-15 minutes), via web or regular mail. Trained interviewers will collect the responses by phone for women who prefer this method. Once the pre-intervention survey is completed, women will receive the leaflet (intervention or control) via regular mail. Two weeks later, the participants will be contacted again to collect the post-intervention survey (15-20 minutes), via web or by phone. Participation in the mammographic exams of the EDBCP will be collected in the three-month period following the corresponding invitation letter.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Lleida, Spain, 25198
        • Lleida Biomedical Research Institute (IRBLLEIDA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

49 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women aged 49-50 who - in 2-4 months - will be invited to participate for the first time in the EDBCP of the Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM, Barcelona), ICO-Hospitalet (Hospitalet de Llobregat), Lleida Health Region, and the Canary Islands.
  • Women with low health literacy will be included

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of breast cancer
  • Difficulty speaking Spanish or Catalan
  • Cognitive impairment to understand or complete the materials based on the interviewer judgment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Decision aid
Women in the intervention arm will receive a leaflet with detailed information on the benefits (breast cancer mortality reduction, less intensive treatments) and harms (false positive results and overdiagnosis).
Other: Decision aid for breast cancer screening
Women in the intervention arm will receive a leaflet with detailed information on the benefits (breast cancer mortality reduction, less intensive treatments) and harms (false positive results and overdiagnosis).
Active Comparator: Control
Women in the control arm will receive a standard leaflet that does not mention harms and recommends accepting the invitation to participate in the biennial exams of the EDBCP.
Other: Standard leaflet
Women in the control arm will receive a standard leaflet that does not mention harms and recommends accepting the invitation to participate in the biennial exams of the EDBCP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Informed choice
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
The primary outcome is informed choice about breast screening (adequate knowledge, and consistency between attitudes and intentions). See Hersch 2015.
Two weeks after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breast screening attitudes
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Breast screening intention
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention and after being invited to be screened
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention and after being invited to be screened
Decisional conflict
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Confidence in the decision made
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Anxiety about screening participation
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Worry about breast cancer
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Anticipated regret
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Time perspective
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Perceived importance of benefit/harms of screening
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention
Perceived risk of breast cancer
Time Frame: Two weeks after the intervention
According to Hersch 2015
Two weeks after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Institut Català d'Oncologia
Hospital del Mar
Canary Islands Health Service

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Montserrat Rué, PhD, Universitat de Lleida-IRBLLEIDA

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 2, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PI14/00113

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Screening

Clinical Trials on Decision aid for breast cancer screening

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings