Liraglutide-bolus vs Glargine-bolus Therapy in Overweight/Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients (LiraGooD) (LiraGooD)

January 9, 2025 updated by: The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide-bolus (Liraglutide Plus Prandial Insulin) Versus Glargine-bolus Therapy in Overweight / Obese Patients With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes (LiraGooD)--A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study

The present 24-week, prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel group trial is carried to investigate and evaluate the efficacy and safety of Liraglutide in combination with prandial insulin therapy vs insulin glargine in combination with prandial insulin therapy in overweight / obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

An increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes are treated with insulin. Patients with diabetes receiving intensive insulin therapy with various combinations of basal and prandial insulin can be caught in a vicious but common cycle, whereby insulin requirements increase over time, and this in turn contributes to weight gain and hypoglycemia and further increases in insulin dosing. At this stage, clinicians observe a practical limit to the efficacy of insulin titration alone on glucose-lowering and often add or continue metformin to reduce insulin resistance. Injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as liraglutide, are a relatively new addition to our treatment armamentarium. These drugs improve glucose control and insulin sensitivity and contribute to weight loss. Treatment with basal insulin plus GLP-1RAs is well-established in diabetes guidelines and may be as effective as adding prandial insulin therapy. When GLP-1 RAs are started, a preemptive reduction in insulin dosage by 25% to 30% in patients with HbA1c < 9% may reduce the risk for hypoglycemia. In overweight/obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes treated with more than three oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) or high doses of premix insulin, Is basal-prandial insulin therapy the option treatment algorithm? Such an intensification strategy carries risk of increased hypoglycaemia and weight gain, both of which are associated with worse long-term outcomes. There have no randomized, controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs vs insulin glargine added to prandial insulin in overweight/obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. So, the current 24-week, prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter, parallel group trial will be preformed to assess whether Liraglutide plus prandial insulin therapy was superior to glargine plus prandial insulin therapy in overweight/obese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
164

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Xin Zheng, MD
  • Phone Number: +86-187-0592-9102
  • Email: 88126386@qq.com

Study Locations

  • China
    • Fujian
      • Xiamen, Fujian, China, 361003
        • Recruiting
        • The first afilliated hospital of Xiamen university
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18 - 75 years old.
  • BMI must be greater than 24 and less than 45 kg/m2
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes who met the World Health Organization (who) diagnostic criteria (1999).
  • Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients with HbA1c ≥ 9.0%；or patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 7.5% ) who have received at least two types of oral hypoglycemic drugs (the dose of each drug needs to reach the second largest dose or more), or only insulin (excluding basal-bolus insulin therapy), or insulin with oral hypoglycemic drugs.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of pancreatic disease,
  • History of medullary thyroid carcinoma
  • Lipase level > 3 times above normal,
  • Creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73m2,
  • Evidence in the last 6 months of significant heart disease or stroke, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, coronary bypass and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional Classification III-IV), or severe ischemic heart disease.
  • Preparation for pregnancy or having been in pregnancy
  • Researchers believe that there are any factors that affect assessing subjects' participation in trial.
  • Patients unable to cooperate in clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Liraglutide-bolus
'Liraglutide-bolus'(Liraglutide once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro). Patients will receive adding Liraglutide to prandial insulin Lispro. The starting liraglutide dose was 0.6mg/day, then 1.2mg/day after 1 week and 1.8mg/day after a further week. The dose was maintained until study completion. Dose of insulin Lispro will be instructed on a titration schedule, adjusted every 3 days.
Drug: Liraglutide
Patients will receive adding Liraglutide to prandial insulin Lispro. The starting liraglutide dose was 0.6mg/day, then 1.2mg/day after 1 week and 1.8mg/day after a further week. The dose was maintained until study completion. Dose of insulin Lispro will be instructed on a titration schedule, adjusted every 3 days.
Other Names:
  • Victozaa
  • Liraglutid
  • Liroglutide
  • Liraglutidum
  • Liraglutide Acetate
Active Comparator: Basal-bolus
'Basal-bolus' (insulin glargine once-daily plus thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro). Patients will receive adding insulin Glargine to prandial insulin Lispro.Dose of insulin will be instructed on a titration schedule, adjusted every 3 days. Patients subcutaneously self-injected once-daily at approximately the same time each day.
Drug: insulin glargine
Individuals randomized to adding insulin Glargine to prandial insulin Lispro will be instructed on a titration schedule, adjusted every 3 days. Patients subcutaneously self-injected once-daily at approximately the same time each day.
Other Names:
  • Lantus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the proportion of patients with HbA1c < 7.0% without experiencing hypoglycemia and without weight gain,with a superiority margin of 3%
Time Frame: 24 weeks
the net difference in the proportion of patients with HbA1c < 7.0% without experiencing hypoglycemia and without weight gain is more than 3%
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes from baseline in FPG(mmol/L)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes from baseline in FPG(mmol/L)
24 weeks
changes in body weight ( kilograms)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in body weight( kilograms)
24 weeks
changes in prandial insulin dosage （per kilogram）
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in prandial insulin dosage （per kilogram）
24 weeks
changes in visceral as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in visceral as assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
24 weeks
number of participants with abnormal laboratory values and/or adverse events that are related to treatment
Time Frame: 24 weeks
number of participants with abnormal laboratory values and/or adverse events
24 weeks
changes in serum c-peptide level
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in serum c-peptide level
24 weeks
changes in systolic pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in systolic pressure
24 weeks
changes in diastolic pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in diastolic pressure
24 weeks
changes in serum lipid profile
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in serum lipid profile
24 weeks
the proportion of patients with hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 24 weeks
the proportion of patients with hypoglycemia
24 weeks
changes in HbA1c
Time Frame: 24 weeks
changes in HbA1c
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xuejun Li, MD, The first afilliated hospital of Xiamen university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 10, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KYH2017-002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings