TAF for HIV-HBV With Renal Dysfunction

March 3, 2020 updated by: University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Prospective Cohort Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Replacing Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate by Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV/HBV-coinfected Patients With Mild or Moderate Renal Dysfunction

The investigators aim at describing changes in renal glomerular and tubular function with after the switch from TDF to TAF in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction and to assess the virological efficacy of TAF on HBV infection.

The study will include HIV/HBV-coinfected participants of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study (SHCS) who are under active care and have been on a stable, TDF-containing ART regimen for at least 6 months. Only patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between 30 ml/min and 90 ml/min will be included. All individuals who agree to participate will be switched from a TDF-containing ART regimen to a TAF-containing triple ART regimen at week 0 and will be followed for 48 weeks after the treatment change.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has been shown to cause less renal complications than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) while having the same virological efficacy against HIV and HBV infections. In a recent study from the USA and Japan, over 90% of HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals had a suppressed HBV viral load 48 weeks after TDF was replaced by TAF. Thus, TAF might be a valuable treatment option for HIV/HBV-coinfected individuals with TDF-toxicity, especially in the context of resistance to lamivudine and entecavir. However, the safety and efficacy of TAF has not been evaluated to date in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with renal dysfunction.

Primary objectives:

  • To evaluate changes in glomerular and tubular renal function after switch from TDF to TAF in HIV/HBV coinfected patients with renal dysfunction
  • To assess the HBV virological efficacy of TAF in HIV/HBV coinfected patients with renal dysfunction switching from TDF to TAF.

Secondary objectives:

  • To assess the percentage of and reasons for treatment interruptions
  • To describe toxicity events including liver-related complications
  • To evaluate changes in liver fibrosis

Intervention:

In eligible patients willing to participate and who have signed an informed consent TDF will be replaced by TAF on day 1 of the study.

Products:

  • Tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) Dose: one tbl. once per day in addition to at least one third compound OR
  • Elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF) Dose: one tbl. once per day

Study Population: eligible patients from all 7 centers of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study will be considered.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Klinik für Infektiologie und Spitalhygiene, Universitätspital Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1211
        • Department of Infectious Diseases, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • Klinik für Infektionskrankheiten & Spitalhygiene, Universitätsspital Zürich
    • Saint Gallen
      • St. Gallen, Saint Gallen, Switzerland, 9007
        • Kantonsspital St. Gallen
    • Ticino
      • Lugano, Ticino, Switzerland, 6903
        • Ospedale Regionale di Lugano
    • Vaud
      • Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 1004
        • Cabinet médical Chave-Crottaz-Roggerto
    • Vaude
      • Lausanne, Vaude, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois (CHUV)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV/HBV-coinfection
  • Suppressed HIV-viremia (<200 cp/ml)
  • On TDF-containing ART since at least 6 months
  • eGFR > 30 ml/min and <90 ml/min
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study drug considered by the treating physician not a valid option for the patient
  • Pregnancy
  • Decompensated liver cirrhosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Switch
Patients are switched from a TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy regimen to a TAF-containing regimen
Drug: Tenofovir Alafenamide
Patients are switched to either Genvoya (TAF/FTC/EVG/COB) or another FTC/TAF-containing ART regimen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in renal function
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Assessment of change in eGFR and tubular markers during the first year of TAF-containing ART
48 weeks
HBV suppression
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Evaluation of HBV virological suppression and HBsAg loss after 12 months of TAF
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment interruptions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Description of the proportion of patients with treatment changes or interruptions
48 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Evaluation of the proportion of patients with adverse events during therapy, including grade 2 or above transaminases elevations
48 weeks
Liver fibrosis change
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Assessment of the proportion of patients with a change in liver fibrosis stage
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Gilles Wandeler, MD MSc, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 5, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 3, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INSEL-HINF-2017-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV and Hepatitis B Coinfection

Clinical Trials on Tenofovir Alafenamide

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings