Functional Imaging in Lung SBRT

October 16, 2019 updated by: University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Functional Outcomes for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Lung Lesions in High Risk Patients

Little is known about the safety of body radiation therapy (SBRT), especially the impact on pulmonary function, quality of life, and on functional changes within the lung itself. Radiation dose constraints and capturing functional changes on imaging are not well studied in this setting.

The current study aims to evaluate the utility of advanced imaging to measure lung function prior to and after treatment and to assess the feasibility of using this data to adapt SBRT planning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is becoming a new standard for unresectable lung metastases and primary lung cancers.

However, it is becoming increasingly common for patients to undergo multiple courses of lung SBRT to synchronous and/or metachronous lung lesions. Further, the indications for SBRT are being expanded to patients who have very poor pulmonary function such as FEV1 < 0.5 L or DLCO < 35% predicted, who have large tumors (>3 cm), or who have centrally located lesions that abut great vessels and mainstem bronchi. Little is known about the safety of such treatments, especially the impact on pulmonary function, quality of life, and on functional changes within the lung itself. Radiation dose constraints and capturing functional changes on imaging are not well studied in this setting.

The current study aims to evaluate the utility of advanced imaging to measure lung function prior to and after treatment and to assess the feasibility of using this data to adapt SBRT planning. SPECT/CT will be used to measure ventilation and perfusion changes while. CT ventilation scans will be used to correlate functional changes observed on diagnostic SPECT/CT. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) will also be used to explore local vascular changes in the treated tumor. In patients whose tumors lie close to the heart, cardiac MRI will be used to investigate whether high doses of radiation per fraction are associated with changes in cardiac function. These imaging modalities may be used to potentially predict toxicity and patient response with the ultimate goal of prospectively adapt dose to individual patient and tumor characteristics. Lung function prior to and post-treatment will also be measured as a correlate of functional imaging changes. Identifying areas of the lung that are sub-functional or low-functioning may offer an opportunity to adapt stereotactic ablations that spare functional lung thereby making SBRT treatments to higher risk patients safer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

High Risk Lung Cancer Patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients receiving SBRT lung treatment and who have any one of the following high risk features:
  • Lung lesion > 5 cm
  • DLCO < 35%
  • FEV1 < 0.5 L
  • Central lung tumors (defined as within 2 cm from the proximal bronchial tree)
  • Tumors that abut the great vessels, trachea, spinal cord, or esophagus
  • Prior lobectomy or pneumonectomy
  • Prior lung radiation (SBRT or conventional definitive lung radiation)
  • Patients must be 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received targeted agents or systemic potentially radiosensitizing chemotherapy within 2 weeks of lung SBRT start
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Unable to tolerate MRI without anesthesia
  • Inability cooperate with the scans

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
High Risk Lung Cancer Patients
Other: CT Scan
Quantitative lung SPECT-CT
Other: Lung CT
CT lung ventilation
Other: MRI
DCE MRI
Other: Walk Test
6 minute hall walk test
Other: SGRQ
St. George Respiratory Questionnaire
Other: Biological Sample Collection
Blood Draw
Other: Toxicity
Toxicity Evaluation
Other: Cardiac Assessment
Cardiac MRI Scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Longitudinal Changes in Lung Function
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To characterize longitudinal changes in lung function using SPECT/CT and CT ventilation scans in "high risk" patients undergoing standard SBRT treatments.
From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dosimetric Predictors to Assess Changes in Toxicity
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To explore radiation dosimetric predictors and correlates of SPECT-CT and CT ventilation functional imaging that predict toxicity in these patients.
From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
Changes in SPECT-CT Correlate with Changes in CT Ventilation
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To determine if early functional changes in SPECT-CT correlate with changes in CT ventilation, pulmonary function and patient reported decrements in lung function on the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).
From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To Assess Early Vascular Changes Using DCE-MRI
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To assess early vascular changes using DCE-MRI in the lung tumor treated with SBRT as a possible predictor of tumor response.
From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Cardiac Function
Time Frame: From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment
To explore if SBRT tumors that lie within 2 cm of the heart cause any changes in cardiac function on cardiac MRI
From baseline to 6 months post Radiation Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Department of Health and Human Services

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Shruti Jolly, M.D., University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • UMCC 2015.146

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on CT Scan

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings