Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Model SC9 IOL Compared to the Model LI61SE IOL (Bausch & Lomb)

August 28, 2023 updated by: CORD, LLC

A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Model SC9 Silicone IOL for the Visual Correction of Aphakia Secondary to the Removal of a Cataractous Lens in Adult Patients With or Without Presbyopia

To evaluate the Model SC9 Intraocular Lens for the improvement of near and intermediate vision when compared to a legally marketed monofocal IOL.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects will be randomized to one of two groups. Group A, (Test Lens, Model SC9) or Group B, (Control Lens, Model LI61SE, Bausch and Lomb).

Both groups will be randomized to receive either unilateral or bilateral implantation. No bilateral implantation is allowed in Phase 1. (50 subjects).

Subjects will be followed for 36 Months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
338

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92008
        • Davies Eye Center
      • Laguna Hills, California, United States, 92653
        • Harvard Eye Associates
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Coastal Vision Laser Eye Center
      • Redding, California, United States, 96001
        • Shasta Eye Medical Group, Inc.
    • Florida
      • Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 33432
        • Aker-Kasten Eye Center
      • Largo, Florida, United States, 33770
        • The Eye Institute of West Florida
    • Minnesota
      • Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55420
        • Chu Vision Institute
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64133
        • Silverstein Eye Centers
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89145
        • Center for Sight
    • Oregon
      • Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
        • Fine, Hoffman and Sims
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77008
        • Houston Eye Associates
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
        • Parkhurst NuVision
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78247
        • Eye Associates of South Texas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Twenty-two years or older at the time of surgery and diagnosed with bilateral cataracts
  • Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent
  • Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits
  • Calculated Lens Power within the available range for the study IOL's
  • Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification
  • Potential postoperative visual acuity of BCDVA 0.2 LogMAR (20/32) or better in both eyes
  • Subjects with less than 1.0D of corneal astigmatism
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract in the study eye
  • Preoperative BCDVA worse than 0.2 LogMar (20/32) with or without glare
  • Pupil size greater or equal to 6.0mm after dilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism
  • Subjects with diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g. macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that are predicted to cause future acuity losses to a level worse than 0.2 LogMAR (20/32)
  • Previous refractive surgery
  • Amblyopia
  • Clinical severe corneal dystrophy (e.g., epithelial, stromal, or endothelial dystrophy)
  • Diabetic retinopathy
  • Extremely shallow anterior chamber, not due to swollen cataract
  • Microphthalmos
  • Previous retinal detachment
  • Previous corneal surgery
  • Recurrent severe anterior or posterior segment inflammation of unknown etiology
  • Rubella or traumatic cataract
  • Iris Neovascularization
  • Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication)
  • Aniridia
  • Optic nerve atrophy
  • Damaged incomplete zonules
  • Systemic disease that could increase the operative risk or confound the outcome
  • Medications that, in the opinion of the investigator may confound the outcome or increase the risk to the subject (tamsulosin hydrochloride (Flomax) or other medications with similar side-effects (floppy iris syndrome)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Model SC9
Investigational IOL
Device: Model SC9
Experimental
Active Comparator: Model LI61SE
FDA Approved IOL
Device: Model LI61SE
Active Comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Visual Acuity Measurements using the LogMar Scale
Time Frame: 12 Months
Subjects must read 20/40 or better, distance corrected near visual acuity and 20/40 or better distance corrected intermediate visual acuity. This is achieved with the subject wearing their best corrected spectacle correction in place and reading a series of letters at 40cm/16" and 80cm/32". Total letters read for each line will determine their visual acuity
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Defocus testing in 0.5D increments from -0.5 to -5.00D
Time Frame: 12 Months
A sub-set of 50 subjects will undergo defocus testing with their best distance correction in place. Minus Lenses in 0.5D increments will be placed over their best spectacle correction. Total letters read for each diopter will be recorded. Percentage of eyes with improvement of monocular depth of focus by at least 0.5D mean difference between the Model SC9 and control lens.(significance level of 0.025). To demonstrate superiority of at least 0.5D compared to the control lens >75% of eyes implanted with the Model SC9 should demonstrate superiority by at least 0.5D mean difference compared to the control lens.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
CORD, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: John Hovanesian, M.D., CORD, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 4, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 22, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 6, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SC9-0015

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Model SC9

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings