A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA)

June 21, 2017 updated by: Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

A Comparison of Different Concentration Ropivacaine Combination With Fentanyl for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery

To compare the postoperative analgesic effect and the intensity of motor block in different concentration ropivacaine plus fentanyl when used epidurally with a patient-controlled analgesia device after Cesarean delivery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Written informed consent must be obtained before any study specific procedures are undertaken.
  2. All patients were received epidural anesthesia with 2% Lidocaine and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for post- operative pain control. PCEA randomly allocated into three groups. Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl, Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl, and Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl. Dermographic data, dosage of PCEA during first 48 hours post-operation，NRS scores, patient satisfaction and the intensity of motor block will be recorded and analyzed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 807
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female undergoing elective Cesarean delivery and receive patient-controlled epidural analgesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With the comorbidity of chronic heart, lung, liver and renal disease, chronic alcoholism, allergy to ropivacaine, poor epidural function and combine other anesthesia method

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Group A
Group A patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 4 mcg /mL fentanyl
Drug: Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Other Names:
  • Ropica
Drug: Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Active Comparator: Group B
Group B patients received 0.08% ropivacaine plus 2mcg /mL fentanyl
Drug: Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Other Names:
  • Ropica
Drug: Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Active Comparator: Group C
Group C patients received 0.16 % ropivacaine plus 2 mcg /mL fentanyl
Drug: Ropivacaine
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.
Other Names:
  • Ropica
Drug: Fentanyl
Compare different concentration of ropivacaine and fentanyl for elective Cesarean delivery post operative pain control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Pain Scores on the numeric rating scale
Time Frame: The investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.
The investigators use numeric rating scale(0~10) for pain severity measurement, 0 for no pain, 10 is the most severe pain
The investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Patient satisfaction scale
Time Frame: The investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.
Patient satisfaction scale (1~4), 1 for very satisfied, 2 for satisfied, 3 for fair, and 4 for unsatisfied
The investigators measured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in modified Bromage scale
Time Frame: The investigatorsmeasured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.
The investigators use modified Bromage scale for motor block evaluation. Modified Bromage scale(0~3), 0 for no motor block. 1 for inability to raise extended leg, able to move knees and feet. 2 for inability to raise extended leg and move knee, able to move feet. 3 for complete block of motor limb
The investigatorsmeasured numeric score changing at 5 different timing. The first is when arrival post-operative care unit, the second is when arrival post-operative care unit for 2 hours. And then 6,24,48 hours after operation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hui-Fang Huang, Kaohsiung Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KMUHIRB-F(1)-20160019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings