Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in Chronic Neck Pain

June 22, 2017 updated by: Veronica Perez Cabezas, University of Cadiz

Effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to Decrease Pain and Increase Mobility in the Cervical Area Compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Symptoms.

The aim of the present study is to value the effectiveness of an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program (ECRP) to decrease pain and increase mobility in the cervical area compared to a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) in patients with chronic neck pain symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background:

In Physiotherapy there is a growing interest of authors to clarify the relationship between the visual system and the neck. Aspects such as deficiencies in eye movement during cervical rotation are common disorders in patients who have suffered whiplash trauma or have dizzy syndromes. On the other hand, deep muscle disorders of the neck are related to the decrease in cervical-ocular reflex. Furthermore, some disorders in eye movements in patients with idiopathic neck pain have been identified.

Consequently, a pragmatic approach to multimodal intervention has been recommended to address changes in sensorimotor control at the cervical level. For this purpose, head-neck sensitization exercises (joint position sense training with head relocation), oculo-motor exercises (ie, eye stability, eye-neck coordination) or balance training have been proposed. These programs lead to a sensorimotor control, reducing pain and disability in the neck. However, it is not known if this approach to treatment is a significant improvement when compared to the implementation of other physiotherapy procedures, so it is unknown if the application of training oculocervical proprioception is more advisable than other modalities of physiotherapy treatment for the improvement of CNP symptoms.

Material and method:

This research is an analytical, longitudinal, prospective, experimental, evaluator blinded study. It is controlled with two parallel groups, randomized clinical trial.

The sample consisted of patients recruited in a Physiotherapy consultation in Cadiz (Spain). These assessments were made before and after the start of program and to the end of intervention (8 months).

Patients were randomized to control or experimental group. All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol, no apply an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in subjects in the first group and performing an Eye-Cervical Re-education Program in the second. This program was carried out by the physiotherapist. Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Cadiz, Spain, 11009
        • Faculty of Nursing and Physiotherapy. University of Cadiz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria were: to show symptoms and clinical signs of neck pain, have a medical diagnosis, meet the following lines according to the classification proposed by the Working Group "Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010" (Axis 1:Health problem receiving health care, Axis II: tertiary care; healthcare in a private Physiotherapy center, Axis III: Grades I and II, Axis IV: Long term, more than three months, Line V: isolated, periodic or permanent Crises) and cervical pain of a mechanical origin, due to repetitive motion or maintenance of positions for long periods.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dizziness syndrome, microwave contraindications and analgesic currents (therapeutic procedures used), post-traumatic, rheumatologic, neurological, infectious or tumor cervical pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Control Group
All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) consisting of: Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).
Other: Combined Physiotherapy Protocol
Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful).
Experimental: Experimental Group

All patients are given a Combined Physiotherapy Protocol (CPP) consisting of: Thermotherapy (70 w continuous microwave for 10 minutes), therapeutic massage (surface rubbing for 5 minutes, 10 minutes of compression and kneading massage and 2 minutes of final surface friction), application of analgesic currents (TENS, by self-adhesive silicone electrodes 4x4 cm, symmetrical biphasic rectangular current, 200 µs width pulse, a frequency of 1 Hz for 10 minutes. The patient should notice a slight vibration, without it being painful). The ECRP developed by Revel et al.(Revel et al., 1994) was also applied to patients in the experimental group.

EYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM (ECRP) This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area
Other: EYE-CERVICAL RE-EDUCATION PROGRAM

Subjects received a total of ten sessions on alternate days.

This includes a total of 10 exercises that has proprioceptive reprogramming in the cervical area with the following phases:

  1. To stimulate ocular mobility without including the cervical movement. The patient was placed in the supine position and the physiotherapist seated, at the height of the head.
  2. To exercise cervical mobility with restricted eye movement. The patient is placed on a rotating stool. The ocular mobility is excluded with opaque glasses that allowed exclusively the foveal vision
  3. Finally we stimulate eye and neck movement coordination. The patient continued to sit on the stool, this time without the glasses.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain
Time Frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
Algometer in 6 points (two trapezius, two in angular of the scapula and two sub-occipital)
Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
Change of range of motion
Time Frame: Baseline and end of treatment (4 weeks)
Measured with inclinometer
Baseline and end of treatment (4 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Rating Index
Time Frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
McGill questionnaire in Spanish version
Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
Numerical rating scale for pain
Time Frame: Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)
VAS visual analogue scale
Baseline and end of treatment(4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Cadiz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • U-Cadiz-V Perez-Cabezas

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neck Pain

Clinical Trials on Combined Physiotherapy Protocol

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings