Evaluation of Triathlon - A New Total Knee Prosthesis System - Triathlon PA vs. Triathlon Pressfit (TriathlonRSA)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The objective is to investigate the Clinical, Radiographic, Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric behaviour and patient outcome when using the Triathlon total knee prosthesis in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
The evaluation is carried out by a prospective randomised RSA-study with Triathlon PA vs. Triathlon Pressfit
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Skåne Län
-
Hässleholm, Skåne Län, Sweden, 281 38
- Skånevård Kryh Division Kirurgi och Ortopedkliniken Hässleholm
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering exclusively from OA, Stage II-V [Ahlbäck, 1968 391] will be operated.
- Patients requiring knee prosthesis, suitable for the use of Duracon and Triathlon knee system
- Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the post-operative scheduled clinical and radiographical evaluations and the prescribed rehabilitation.
- Patients who signed the Ethics Committee approved Informed Consent Form prior to surgery.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous major knee surgery
- Other significant disabling problems from the muscular-skeletal system than in the knees
- Obese patients where obesity is severe enough to affect subject's ability to perform activities of daily living (body mass index, kg/m2: BMI above 35).
- Patients with active or suspected infection.
- Patients with malignancy - active malignancy.
- Patients with severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy.
- Patients immunologically suppressed, or receiving steroids in excess of physiologic dose requirements.
- The patient has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device or the patient has a neurological deficit which interferes with the patient's ability to limit weight bearing or places an extreme load on the implant during the healing period.
- Female patients planning a pregnancy during the course of the study.
- Patients with systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration.
- Patients, who as judged by the surgeon, are mentally incompetent or are unlikely to be compliant with the prescribed post-operative routine and follow-up evaluation schedule.
- Patients with other severe concurrent joint involvements, which can affect their outcome.
- Patients with other concurrent illnesses, which are likely to affect their outcome such as sickle cell anaemia, systemic lupus erythematosus or renal disease requiring dialysis.
- Patients under the protection of law (e.g. guardianship).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Triathlon PA
Triathlon PA (HA-surface) versus Triathlon Pressfit design: The goal with the un-cemented technique is to reach a full integration between the bone and the prosthesis.
During the last years the usage of prosthesis with hydroxyapatite surface within tooth-, mandibular-surgery, hips- and knee-joints, have increased significantly.
It has been shown that a thin layer of hydroxyapatite stimulates the anchorage of the implant.
The goal with this sub study is to compare the stability of the fixation when using two different types of Triathlon un-cemented prosthesis designs.
PA (HA-surface) versus Pressfit.
|
Implantation of Knee Prosthesis
|
|
Active Comparator: Triathlon Pressfit
Triathlon PA (HA-surface) versus Triathlon Pressfit design: The goal with the un-cemented technique is to reach a full integration between the bone and the prosthesis.
During the last years the usage of prosthesis with hydroxyapatite surface within tooth-, mandibular-surgery, hips- and knee-joints, have increased significantly.
It has been shown that a thin layer of hydroxyapatite stimulates the anchorage of the implant.
The goal with this sub study is to compare the stability of the fixation when using two different types of Triathlon un-cemented prosthesis designs.
PA (HA-surface) versus Pressfit.
|
Implantation of Knee Prosthesis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 10 years follow-up
|
Assessment of fixation and stability of the Triathlon total knee prosthesis by Roentgen Assessment of fixation and stability of the Triathlon total knee prosthesis by RSA as a predictor of late mechanical loosening.
|
10 years follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters.
Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points.
Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
|
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
|
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) patient questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
KOOS consists of 5 subscales: Pain, other symptoms, function in daily living , function in sport and recreation and knee related quality of life (QOL).
The previous week is the time period considered when answering the questions.
Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question is assigned a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms).
|
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
|
Investigation of clinical performance and patient outcome with EuroQuol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) patient questionnaire
Time Frame: pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
The EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status.
|
pre-operative, 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
|
Investigation of patient outcome with radiographic analysis
Time Frame: 3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
Plain radiographs will be obtained for assessment of fixation of the device.
|
3 months, 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sören Toksvig-Larsen, MD, Skånevård Kryh Division Kirurgi och Ortopedkliniken Hässleholm
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- K-S-015 Triathlon RSA _3
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
-
NCT03849638RecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT05075200CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT02422667WithdrawnArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT04803578CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT03008967CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT07345299Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip | Arthroplasty Replacement, Knee
-
NCT06208553Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT06107296RecruitingArthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement
-
NCT04896892Not yet recruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
-
NCT05452161CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Clinical Trials on Triathlon PA
-
NCT02522728Completed
-
NCT02525601Active, not recruiting
-
NCT02525614CompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
-
NCT04496102UnknownOsteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty
-
NCT02539992TerminatedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
-
NCT00966979TerminatedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee