Efficacy of Lu AF35700 in Patients With Early-in-disease or Late-in-disease Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia (Anew)

January 10, 2020 updated by: H. Lundbeck A/S

Interventional, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study of the Efficacy of Lu AF35700 in Patients With Early-in-disease or Late-in-disease Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia

This study evaluates the efficacy of 10 mg/day Lu AF35700 on symptoms of schizophrenia in patients with early-in-disease (ED) or late-in-disease (LD) treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the study, patients will receive risperidone (4-6 mg/day), or, if recently failed on risperidone, olanzapine (15-20mg/day). Later during the study, patients will be randomized to either receive Lu AF35700 (10 mg/day), or continue their treatment from the prospective confirmation (PC) period.

The study consists of a Screening Period (up to 3 weeks), a single-blind PC Period (6 weeks), a Double-blind Treatment (DBT) Period (8 weeks), and a Safety Follow-up Period (6 weeks).

Patients who did not fulfil the randomization criteria for the DBT Period, were withdrawn from the study after the PC period.

Patients who fulfilled the randomization criteria for the DBT Period, continued into the DBT period and were randomized into one of the 2 treatmetn arms (1:1) with either Lu AF35700 10 mg or to continue the treatment allocated in the PC period (olanzapine or risperidone) at the dose set at the last visit of the PC period. This means that approximately half of the confirmed treatment-resistant patients were randomised back to the failed treatment in the PC period.

Data was not collected seperately for the DBT olanzapine and DBT risperidone participants, and there was no intent to compare Lu AF35700 to each drug seperately.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
119

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Bulgaria
      • Kardzhali, Bulgaria
        • SPH - Kardzhali
      • Novi Iskar, Bulgaria
        • State Psychiatric Hospital
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • UMHAT
      • Radnevo, Bulgaria
        • State Psychiatric Hospital
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • DCC St. Vrach and St.St. Kuzma and Damian
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • MHC - Sofia
      • Tărgovište, Bulgaria
        • MHAT - Targovishte
  • Japan
      • Aizu-Wakamatsu, Japan
        • Takeda General Hospital - JP0009
      • Fukushima, Japan
        • Takeda General Hospital
      • Ichikawa, Japan
        • Kohnodai Hospital
      • Kashihara, Japan
        • Nara Medical University Hospital
      • Kita, Japan
        • Sankeikai Nishigahara Hospital - JP0008
      • Kitakyushu, Japan
        • University Of Occupational And Environmental Health Hospital
      • Kodaira, Japan
        • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
      • Kumamoto, Japan
        • Satokai Yuge Hospital
      • Kunigami, Japan
        • NHO Ryukyu Hospital
      • Toyoake, Japan
        • Fujita Health University Hospital
  • Russian Federation
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
        • Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital
      • Lipetsk, Russian Federation
        • Lipetsk regional psychoneurological hospital
      • Lipetsk, Russian Federation
        • GUZ Lipetsk Regional psychoneurological Hospital 1
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • City Psychiatric Hospital # 6
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Psychoneurological Dispensary #10
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Psychoneurological Dispensary #1
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • Samara Psychiatric Hospital
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation
        • Tomsk National Research Medical Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
      • Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
        • Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital
  • United Kingdom
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • Royal Edinburgh Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • The Maudsley Hospital - GB0001
      • London, United Kingdom
        • The Maudsley Hospital
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Manchester Mental Health & Social Care NHS Trust - GB0003
      • Manchester, United Kingdom
        • Manchester Mental Health & Social Care NHS Trust
  • United States
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • University of California San Diego Health System
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30329
        • Emory University Cognitive Neurology Clinic & ADRC
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University
    • Massachusetts
      • Fall River, Massachusetts, United States, 02720
        • Corrigan Mental Health Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605-2610
        • University of Massachusetts Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48108
        • Michigan Clinical Research Institute PC
      • Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States, 49001
        • Kalamazoo Community Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63128
        • PsychCare Consultants Research
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
        • Creighton University
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84105
        • Psychiatric and Behavioral Solutions

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has schizophrenia, diagnosed according to DSM-5(TM). (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and confirmed by the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Schizophrenia and Psychotic Disorders (MINI-Schz).
  • The patient is receiving treatment with a psychiatrist in either an inpatient or outpatient facility.
  • The patient has been treated with adequate dose(s) of antipsychotic drug treatment for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • The patient has failed to show an adequate response in the level of psychotic symptoms during at least one documented treatment trial with an adequate dose of an antipsychotic drug prescribed for an adequate time (at least lasting for 6 weeks) within 2 years prior to the Screening Visit. The failure to respond to the current antipsychotic drug treatment trial may be considered a retrospective failed treatment, if the patient has been treated for 6 weeks with adequate dose(s) of antipsychotic drug(s).
  • The patient has a PANSS total score of ≥80 (on 1-7 scale) and a score of ≥4 (≥ "Moderate" on 1-7 scale) on at least 2 of the following PANSS items at the Screening and at Baseline 1 [Week 0] Visits: P2 - Conceptual disorganization, P3 - Hallucinatory behavior, P6 - Suspiciousness/persecution, G9 - Unusual thought content; AND the patient has a CGI-S score of ≥4 (≥ "Moderately ill") at the Screening and at Baseline 1 (Week 0) Visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has any current primary psychiatric disorder other than schizophrenia, as assessed using the MINI-Schz.
  • The patient suffers from mental retardation, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-5™ criteria).
  • The patient is experiencing an acute exacerbation of his/her psychotic symptoms.
  • The patient has been treated with, AND is resistant to, clozapine according to the investigator's judgement.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Prospective Confirmation (PC) Period
Single (patient)-blinded treatment period with risperidone or olanzapine for 6 weeks
Drug: Risperidone
4-6 mg/day, encapsulated tablets, orally
Drug: Olanzapine
15-20 mg/day, encapsulated tablets, orally
Experimental: Double-blind treatment (DBT) period, Lu AF35700 10 mg
Eligible patients from PC period (based on criteria to which investigator and patient are blinded ), will be randomly assigned (1:1) double-blind treatment in DBT period, 8 weeks
Drug: Lu AF35700
10 mg/day, encapsulated tablets, orally
Experimental: DBT Period, Continued treatment from PC Period
Eligible patients from PC period (based on criteria to which investigator and patient are blinded ), will be randomly assigned (1:1) double-blind treatment in DBT period, 8 weeks. Patients in this arm will continue with the same treatment and dose as at the last visit of the PC Period
Drug: Risperidone
4-6 mg/day, encapsulated tablets, orally
Drug: Olanzapine
15-20 mg/day, encapsulated tablets, orally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Randomization to Week 8 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
Time Frame: From Randomization to Week 8
PANSS total score administered by the investigator. It included a total of 30 items that evaluated the Positive Symptoms subscale, the Negative Symptoms subscale, the General Psychopathology subscale. Each item is rated from 1 (symptom not present) to 7 (symptom extremely severe). PANSS total score was calculated as sum of all the items on the scale and ranged from 30 to 210. A negative score indicates an improvement compared to Randomization.
From Randomization to Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Randomization to Week 8 in Global Clinical Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
Time Frame: From Randomization to Week 8
CGI-S provides the clinician's impression of the patient's current state of mental illness. The clinician uses his or her clinical experience of this patient population to rate the severity of the patient's current mental illness on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal - not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher scores indicate worsening
From Randomization to Week 8
Change From Randomization to Week 8 in 16-item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16 Total) Score
Time Frame: From Randomization to Week 8
The NSA-16 is a clinician-rated scale designed to assess the presence, severity, and range of negative symptoms associated with schizophrenia. The NSA-16 consists of 16 items arranged in 5 subdomains: communication dysfunction (items 1 to 4), emotional/affective dysfunction (items 5 to 7), dysfunction in sociality (items 8 to 10), motivational/hedonic dysfunction (items 11 to 14), and reduced psychomotor activity (items 15 and 16), and a Global Negative Symptom Rating. NSA-16 items are rated on a 6-point scale from 1 (behaviour is normal) to 6 (behaviour severely reduced), and a score of 9 if the item is not-rateable. The Global Negative Symptom Rating is rated from 1 (no evidence of symptoms) to 7 (extremely severe symptoms). The 16 items are summed to yield a total score ranging from 16 to 96 and the global rating ranges from 1 to 7.
From Randomization to Week 8
Change From Randomization to Week 8 in PANSS Marder Negative Factor Score
Time Frame: From Randomization to Week 8
The PANSS Negative Factor score is a subset of the PANSS assessing negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The factor consist of the seven items: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive social withdrawal, lack of spontaneity, motor retardation, and active social avoidance which are each rated on a 7-point scale, from 1=absent to 7=extreme. The PANSS Negative Factor score (7 items) range from 7 to 49 with a higher score indicating greater severity of symptoms.
From Randomization to Week 8
Response
Time Frame: at Week 8
Response is defined as a ≥20% reduction in PANSS total score from Randomization
at Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
H. Lundbeck A/S

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 23, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17303A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment-resistant Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Risperidone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings