Microvascular Dysfunction in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: Insights From CMR Assessment of Coronary Flow Reserve

August 26, 2020 updated by: Duke University
The aim of this study is to assess microvascular function as determined by a cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurement of whole-heart (global) perfusion reserve. The goal is to determine the prevalence of MVD in two common forms of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). The hypothesis that an optimized technique will provide robust detection of MVD and that a multifaceted approach will provide new insights into the pathophysiology of MVD, including the influence of myocardial scarring upon the presence and severity of MVD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (MVD) has been implicated as an important marker of cardiac risk and has been thought to directly contribute to the pathogenesis of a wide variety of cardiomyopathies. For instance, MVD is believed to cause ischemia (with reduction in coronary flow reserve) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) despite the presence of angiographically normal epicardial coronary arteries. The implication is that MVD in HCM may lead to the ventricular arrhythmias, sudden death, and heart failure. Similarly, patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) have blunted coronary flow reserve, which appears to be independently associated with poor prognosis.

Several etiologic mechanisms have been proposed to explain the occurrence of MVD, including structural and functional abnormalities1:

  1. increased microvascular resistance due to reduced vascular luminal caliber.
  2. reduced density of microvessels associated with replacement scarring.
  3. inappropriate vasoconstrictor responses.
  4. inadequate vasodilator responses.

Unfortunately, these mechanisms are difficult to study in humans since no technique currently allows the direct visualization of the coronary microcirculation in vivo. Thus, MVD has been largely studied using non-invasive imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) or single photon emitted computed tomography (SPECT).

Although these methods have provided insight into MVD, much remains unknown. For example, even the prevalence of MVD in patients with various types of cardiomyopathy is unclear, with different studies showing widely different rates.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is increasingly being used in clinical practice to evaluate cardiac disease. CMR employs a multifaceted imaging approach with separate techniques used to acquire separate sets of raw data, providing information on cardiac morphology, function, regional myocardial ischemia, scarring, and global myocardial perfusion reserve. The advantage of this approach is that image artifacts in one set of data will not affect the quality of the other datasets, and the datasets in combination can be used to distinguish separate pathophysiologies that could confound image interpretation. For example, perfusion defects could be due to ischemia or scar tissue, but since the investigators will obtain both perfusion images and scar images, the investigators will be able to resolve the etiology. Additionally, CMR provides high spatial resolution (over 10-fold higher than PET), and hence partial volume affects will be kept to a minimum and variability in measurements will be reduced.

The aim of this study is to assess microvascular function as determined by a cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurement of whole-heart (global) perfusion reserve. The goal is to determine the prevalence of MVD in two common forms of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). The hypothesis that an optimized technique will provide robust detection of MVD and that a multifaceted approach will provide new insights into the pathophysiology of MVD, including the influence of myocardial scarring upon the presence and severity of MVD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27110
        • Duke Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men or women aged 18 years or older

Cardiomyopathy patients

  • Patients presenting for CMR with the clinical diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on left ventricular wall thickness of at least ≥15 mm in the absence of any other cardiac or systemic cause of hypertrophy
  • Patients presenting for CMR with the clinical diagnosis of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy based upon left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, LV end-diastolic diameter ≥55 mm or left ventricular end-systolic diameter ≤45 mm, and the absence of coronary stenoses on angiography.

Control patients

  • Patients presenting for CMR without evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease either by coronary angiography or stress testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensated heart failure or hemodynamic instability
  • Prior coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) or myocardial infarction (as evidenced by previously elevated CPK-MB or troponin levels)
  • Accelerating angina or unstable angina
  • Inability to physically tolerate MRI or implanted objects that are MRI incompatible
  • Inability to provide written informed consent obtained at time of study enrollment.
  • Severe claustrophobia
  • Advanced heart block or sinus node dysfunction
  • Hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to regadenoson or adenosine
  • Hypotension
  • Active bronchospasm or history of hospitalization due to bronchospasm
  • History of seizures
  • Recent cerebrovascular accident
  • Use of dipyridamole within the last 5 days
  • Contraindication to aminophylline
  • Severe renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/ 1.73 m2
  • Pregnant or nursing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Control
Drug: Regadenoson
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.
Drug: Adenosine
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Drug: Regadenoson
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.
Drug: Adenosine
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
Drug: Regadenoson
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.
Drug: Adenosine
Microvascular disease will be considered present if regional perfusion defects are observed or global perfusion reserve is reduced. For the assessment of microvascular disease, the adenosine and regadenoson groups will be combined, as the medications are considered interchangeable.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of Microvascular Dysfunction (MVD) by a CMR Measurement of Whole-heart (Global) Perfusion Reserve Ratio in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy, and Controls.
Time Frame: The prevalence of MVD will be determined based on the findings at the time of the scan on Day 1 of the study.

Prevalence of microvascular dysfunction as determined by the CMR measure of global perfusion reserve ratio (GPR) in each these patient groups. MVD was considered present when either GPR was <2.0 or regional stress perfusion abnormalities were present.

In order to calculate this ratio, coronary sinus flow was measured twice:

  1. prior to the the administration of adenosine/regadenoson
  2. during the administration of adenosine/regadenoson

GPR is a ratio of coronary sinus flow during the administration adenosine/regadenoson divided by the baseline coronary sinus flow measured prior to the administration.

Regional perfusion abnormalities will be assessed at the time of adenosine/regadenoson administration.
The prevalence of MVD will be determined based on the findings at the time of the scan on Day 1 of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CMR Measurement of Global Perfusion Reserve Ratio
Time Frame: The global perfusion ratio will be calculated from the measurements obtained at the time of the scan on Day 1 of the study.

Comparison of the CMR measure of global perfusion reserve ratio (GPR) in each these patient groups.

In order to calculate this ratio, coronary sinus flow was measured twice:

  1. prior to the the administration of adenosine/regadenoson
  2. during the administration of adenosine/regadenoson
The global perfusion ratio will be calculated from the measurements obtained at the time of the scan on Day 1 of the study.
The Association Between Global Perfusion Reserve (GPR) Ratio and Regional Myocardial Scarring.
Time Frame: Both global perfusion ratio and the presence of regional scarring will be determined/measured from the images obtained during the scan on Day 1 of the study.
Relationship between global perfusion reserve ratio and regional myocardial scarring.
Both global perfusion ratio and the presence of regional scarring will be determined/measured from the images obtained during the scan on Day 1 of the study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Han Kim, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 5, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 11, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00082447

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on Regadenoson

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings