No Association Between Vitamin C and E Supplementation, Frailty, and Grip Strength Over Five Years: The CoLaus Study (CoLaus)

August 21, 2017 updated by: Pedro Marques-Vidal, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
To assess the cross-sectional and 5-year prospective association between self-reported vitamin C+E dietary supplementation and markers of grip strength and frailty in community-dwelling Swiss adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Participants were drawn from the Colaus study, a prospective study designed to evaluate the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and identify genetic determinants of these risk factors in an adult Swiss population. Details of the sampling procedure have been previously published (22) and can be located online (http://www.colaus.ch).

Recruitment for the baseline Colaus study began in June 2003 and ended in May 2006, enrolling 6733 participants. The first follow-up was performed between April 2009 and September 2012, 5.5 years on average after the collection of baseline data. The information collected was similar to that in the baseline examination but included questions regarding food consumption and physical activity for the first time. The second follow-up was performed between May 2014 and July 2016, 10.7 years on average after the collection of baseline data and applied similar methods to those in the first follow-up. For this study, data from the first and the second follow-ups were used.

All participants were examined in the morning after a fast of at least 8 hours. They were surveyed about their personal and family history of cardiovascular disease, CVRFs, and cardiovascular treatment. They also specified all prescribed and nonprescribed drugs used in the last 4 weeks, including dietary and vitamin supplements.

Vitamin supplement use Vitamin supplement use and dietary intake were evaluated using a self-administered, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). This FFQ includes 3 questions regarding the intake of vitamin C, vitamin E, and multivitamins and was previously validated in the nearby Geneva population (23, 24). In short, this questionnaire computes the previous 4 weeks' dietary intake and comprises 97 distinct food items that account for more than 90% of intake of calories, proteins, fat, carbohydrates, alcohol, cholesterol, vitamin D, and retinol and 85% of fibre, carotene, and iron. There does not yet exist an FFQ in Switzerland that can assess dietary intake for an entire year (25). Thus, this FFQ provides the most accurate dietary assessment available. The FFQs were completed by participants prior to their visits so the questionnaires could be reviewed by trained investigators in person.

Vitamin C+E users were defined as those who reported consumption of at least 0.5/day of either vitamin C or vitamin E supplements on the FFQ. As there are few single-vitamin supplements available in Switzerland and many MVM can contain either vitamin C or vitamin E or both, the investigators also considered MVM for sensitivity analysis. As many participants failed to provide the exact brand name of the MVM, it was not possible to calculate the exact intake of vitamin C or vitamin E (5). Vitamin D and/or calcium supplements were coded separately and were not included in the MVM category since most vitamin D and/or calcium supplements were prescribed for management of osteoporosis in women.

Other covariates Subjects were considered smokers if they smoked at the time of the interview; former smokers were defined as smokers who had quit smoking no matter how long before their interview; never smokers were defined as those who had never smoked. Educational level was categorized as low (primary), middle (apprenticeship or high school), and high (university) for highest completed level of education. Physical activity was assessed with a self-reported questionnaire previously validated in a population living in Geneva (28). This questionnaire considers the category and duration of 70 different forms of (non)professional activities and sports from the previous 7 days. Sedentary status was defined as expending more than 90% of daily energy expenditures in activities less intense than moderate- and high-intensity (defined by expending at least 4 times one's basal metabolic rate) (29, 30).

Body weight and height were measured while participants stood without shoes in light indoor attire. Body weight was measured in kilograms to the nearest 100 g using a Seca® scale (Hamburg, Germany) that was frequently calibrated. Height was measured to the nearest 5 mm using a Seca® (Hamburg, Germany) height gauge. Body composition was examined with electrical bioelectrical impedance using the Bodystat 1500 analyzer (Isle of Man, UK) that has been previously validated (31).

Other dietary (non-vitamin) supplements were obtained from the drug questionnaire given to all participants and include substances such as shark cartilage, cod liver oil, or plant extracts not registered as phytotherapy in the Swiss drug compendium.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2711

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All inhabitants of Lausanne city, Switzerland, aged 35 to 75 at the time of the Baseline study (2003-2006)

Description

Inclusion criteria Participation in the first follow-up of the CoLaus study Exclusion criteria for the cross-sectional study

  1. missing grip strength;
  2. missing covariates
  3. missing or suspicious body fat values Further exclusion criteria for the prospective analysis
  4. did not complete the second follow-up
  5. missing grip strength at the second follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip strength
Time Frame: Between April 2009 and September 2012, and 5.5 years afterwards
Grip strength was assessed using the Baseline® Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer (Fabrication Enterprises Inc, Elmsford, NY, USA) with the subject seated, shoulders adducted and neutrally rotated, elbow flexed at 90°, forearm in neutral position, and wrist between 0 and 30° of dorsiflexion per American Society of Hand Therapists's guidelines (26). Three measurements were performed successively with the subject's right hand, and the highest value (expressed in kg), along with the participant's dominant hand choice, was recorded.
Between April 2009 and September 2012, and 5.5 years afterwards

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Low grip strength
Time Frame: Between April 2009 and September 2012, and 5.5 years afterwards
Grip strength was categorized as low (defined as frail in this study) or normal according to the Fried criteria, which also considers sex and body mass index (BMI).
Between April 2009 and September 2012, and 5.5 years afterwards

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter Vollenweider, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
  • Principal Investigator: Gérard Waeber, MD, PhD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2 (Other Identifier: Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frail Elderly Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Observational cohort study

Search Similar Trials