High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

September 30, 2021 updated by: UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of High Dose Intravenous Thiamine for the Prevention of Delirium in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Purpose: To conduct a randomized controlled pilot study investigating the use of high dose intravenous (IV) thiamine to prevent delirium and mitigate the long-term effects of delirium, including health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and neuropsychiatric outcomes, in patients admitted to University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospital for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).

Participants: 60 adult inpatients admitted to the UNC Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Procedures (methods): Participants will be admitted for allogeneic HSCT and on the day after transplant randomized to seven days of high dose IV thiamine or placebo. Thiamine levels will be measured weekly and participants will be assessed for evidence of delirium using validated measures. Validated measures will also be used to assess cognitive function, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, functional status, and HRQOL prior to hospitalization and at one, three, and six months after transplant.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Delirium is a common and potentially preventable neuropsychiatric complication in cancer patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that has profound consequences. Among cancer patients hospitalized for HSCT, delirium occurs in approximately 40% of patients and increases the risk of mortality. Long-term, delirium in this population results in worse physical health, mental health, and quality of life. Though strategies to prevent delirium have the potential to significantly improve the lives of people living with cancer, research in this area is extremely limited. Thiamine deficiency is also ubiquitous during HSCT and a known contributor to the development of delirium in other patient populations. High dose intravenous (IV) thiamine is an evidence-based and promising treatment for delirium, but no one has studied IV thiamine as a prevention strategy.

This is a randomized double-blind controlled trial in participants undergoing allogeneic HSCT to determine if high dose IV thiamine can prevent delirium and minimize the deleterious impact of delirium on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), functional status, and other neuropsychiatric outcomes. The investigators will recruit 60 patients admitted for allogeneic HSCT at UNC, randomize them to treatment with high dose IV thiamine (n = 30) versus placebo (n = 30), and systematically evaluate all participants for delirium and related comorbidities. The investigators will use the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) to measure the severity and duration of delirium immediately prior to transplant and after HSCT until 30 days post-transplant or discharge. If delirium is identified, the DRS will be administered daily until delirium resolves. The investigators will obtain thiamine levels and other laboratory parameters associated with delirium the day after transplant, and continue to monitor thiamine levels weekly thereafter. The investigators will also monitor HRQOL, functional status, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and cognitive function prior to transplant and at one, three, and six months after transplant to elucidate the persistent impact of delirium in this population and the potential for thiamine to mitigate these negative outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to the UNC Hospital Bone Marrow Transplant Unit for allogeneic stem cell transplant
  • At least 18 years of age
  • Able to speak English
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of adverse reaction to IV thiamine
  • Pregnancy, confirmed by a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Thiamine 200 mg IV
Drug: Thiamine
200 mg IV three times daily for seven days
Other Names:
  • Thiamine Hydrochloride Injection
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control
Normal saline IV
Drug: Normal saline
Normal saline IV three times daily for seven days
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Delirium
Time Frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.
Delirium incidence will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium incidence will be defined as at least one assessment with DRS > 12.
Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delirium Severity
Time Frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant (baseline), then at least 3 times post-transplant on a weekly basis until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first, up to week 5
Delirium severity will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The score ranges from 0 to 32 with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. The DRS medians and ranges are reported for each group at baseline and in each week of hospitalization for thiamine and placebo groups.
Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant (baseline), then at least 3 times post-transplant on a weekly basis until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first, up to week 5
Delirium Duration
Time Frame: Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.
Delirium duration will be measured using the Delirium Rating Scale (DRS). The DRS is a is a 10-item, clinician-rated scale that rates the severity of delirium symptoms over a 24-hour period using all available information from the patient interview, mental status examination, medical history and tests, nursing observations, and family reports. The maximum possible score is 32. Higher scores suggest more severe symptoms. A cut-off score of > 12 has been suggested to distinguish patients with delirium from patients with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Delirium duration will be reported as number of consecutive days during which DRS > 12.
Assessments will occur in the week prior to transplant, then 3 times weekly post-transplant until 30 days post-transplant or discharge, whichever comes first.
Concentration of Thiamine Status Stratified by Delirium Status
Time Frame: From end of 7-day intervention period until the development of delirium at any point during the post-transplant hospitalization up to a maximum of 30 days
The relationship between thiamine levels at the end of the seven day administration of thiamine and the development of delirium at any point during the thirty days post-transplant or the post-transplant hospitalization, whichever comes first, will be examined. Thiamine levels (nmol/L) are presented in participants who did and did not experience delirium.
From end of 7-day intervention period until the development of delirium at any point during the post-transplant hospitalization up to a maximum of 30 days
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 1)
Time Frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant
HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
From baseline to one month post-transplant
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 3)
Time Frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant
HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
Baseline to three months post-transplant
Change in Health-related Quality of Life Scores (Month 6)
Time Frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant
HRQOL will be assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT). The FACT-BMT is a 47-item self-administered assessment which asks individuals to rate questions related to physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being on a 5-point Likert Scale (0, not at all to 4, very much). Scores are summed across the items, resulting in a score from 0 to 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Negative change scores indicate worse HRQOL with time.
Baseline to six months post-transplant
Change in Depression Scores (Month 1)
Time Frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant
Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Baseline to one month post-transplant
Change in Depression Scores (Month 3)
Time Frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant
Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Baseline to three months post-transplant
Change in Depression Scores (Month 6)
Time Frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant
Depression will be assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-D) 8a short form. Scores for all PROMIS measures are reported on the T-score metric in which the mean=50 and standard deviation (SD) = 10 are centered on the general population means. Higher scores represent greater degrees of mood symptoms. Positive change scores indicate worse mood over time.
Baseline to six months post-transplant
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 1)
Time Frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant
Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.
Baseline to one month post-transplant
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 3)
Time Frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant
Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.
Baseline to three months post-transplant
Change in Post-traumatic Stress Symptom Scores (Month 6)
Time Frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant
Post-traumatic stress symptoms will be measured using the Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome Scale 14 (PTSS-14). The PTSS-14 is a 14-item self-administered assessment. Questions are on a 7-point Likert-type Scale (1, never to 7, always) resulting in a total score between 14 and 98. Higher scores represent a more likely diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Positive change scores indicate worse post-traumatic stress over time.
Baseline to six months post-transplant
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 1)
Time Frame: From baseline to one month post-transplant
Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
From baseline to one month post-transplant
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 3)
Time Frame: Baseline to three months post-transplant
Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
Baseline to three months post-transplant
Change in Cognitive Function Scores (Month 6)
Time Frame: From baseline to six months post-transplant
Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The MOCA is a clinician-administered tool with scores ranging from 0 to 30. Lower scores indicate worse cognitive function. Scores ≤ 25 are considered clinically significant. Positive change scores indicate better function with time.
From baseline to six months post-transplant
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 1)
Time Frame: Baseline to one month post-transplant
Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
Baseline to one month post-transplant
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 3)
Time Frame: From baseline to three months post-transplant
Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
From baseline to three months post-transplant
Change in Functional Status Scores (Month 6)
Time Frame: Baseline to six months post-transplant
Functional status will be measured using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale. ECOG performance status is a single question scored on a 6-point scale (range 0 to 5) with higher scores representing greater physical restriction due to illness. Negative change scores indicate better function with time.
Baseline to six months post-transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rising Tide Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Donald Rosenstein, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Principal Investigator: Zev Nakamura, MD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 16, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 2, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LCCC1726
  • CCR-17-300 (OTHER_GRANT: Rising Tide Foundation for Clinical Cancer Research)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium

Clinical Trials on Thiamine

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings