NEUROFEEDSTIM : Therapeutic Use of Neurofeedback in Depression in Association With TMS (NEUROFEEDSTIM)

November 5, 2019 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Neurofeedback is an increasingly researched technique for the treatment of many psychological disorders, such as attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder (AD / HD), depression, or substance abuse. This technique would allow patients to regulate their cortical electroencephalographic activity while receiving a visual or auditory feedback on the cortical electroencephalographic activity. Changes in the electroencephalogram (EEG) would thus be correlated with changes in cortical activity and thus with symptoms.

On the electroencephalographic plane, the depression appears associated with relatively more alpha activity (in "resting state", 8-13 Hz) in left than in right frontal cortex. This difference in alpha activity between frontal regions is known as alpha asymmetry in depression. As a reminder, increased alpha activity indicates a decrease in cortical activation. This alpha asymmetry appears to be associated with a decrease in sensitivity to reward.

It is on these bases that the modification of the alpha asymmetry has become one of the most frequent objectives of the studies on the use of neurofeedback in depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) also offers a non-invasive and painless method of effective cerebral stimulation in psychiatric disorders and especially depression. It received a favorable opinion from the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States for the treatment of this pathology. This treatment is still under evaluation in France. The results are promising but improvements must be done to increase its effectiveness.

TMS offers stimulation of brain tissue in a localized and non-invasive manner. The principle consists of a brief electric current passing through a coil which generates a transient magnetic field inducing an electric field through conductive fabrics. TMS modifies neuronal activity in target superficial brain structures, but also modulates neuronal circuit activity.

In recent years, the concept of "state dependency TMS" has been developed. It suggests that the activation state of neuronal circuits before and after stimulation alters the effect of stimulation. Thus, the efficacy of TMS could be amplified in depression by taking into account the cerebral activity during the stimulation sessions, in particular on the electroencephalographic plane.

However, TMS may also help patients increase their EEG response during Neurofeedback sessions.

The combination of stimulation techniques and brain-machine interfaces such as neurofeedback is still little studied at present.

A study on the combined use of TMS and Neurofeedback by EEG in depression would therefore be an innovative approach and in line with the latest data from the literature.

Design : Prospective, monocentric, non-randomized, non-comparative, unblinded study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Primary objective : To demonstrate a decrease in the intensity of depressive symptomatology following EEG-neurofeedback training in association with TMS and see if there is a correlation with a change in frontal asymmetry.

Secondary objective : To demonstrate a cognitive improvement in patients with respect to motivation and control of thoughts, as well as perceived health, self-esteem and anxiety following EEG-neurofeedback training in association with TMS and to see if there is a correlation between the change in scores on psychometric scales with a change in frontal asymmetry.

The expected outcomes of this study are:

  • Better characterization of the pathophysiological processes involved in depressive disorder;
  • An evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG-Neurofeedback training in recurrent depressive disorder in association with TMS, both emotionally and cognitively;
  • The development of innovative technologies in the field of brain-machine interfaces and optimization of procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Britanny
      • Rennes, Britanny, France, 35000
        • Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a major depressive episode (DSM IV-TR 296) with an indication of TMS (whether or not they have previously benefited from TMS);
  • Aged 18 and over;
  • With a score greater than or equal to 15 at the MADRS;
  • Under stable and unchanged pharmacological treatment for at least one month;
  • Having signed a free and informed consent to participate in the study.

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Other psychiatric disorder of axis 1 of DSM IV-TR (schizophrenia, substance abuse / dependence, ...);
  • Neurological or dementia history according to DSM criteria;
  • Pregnant or nursing women;
  • Major persons subject to legal protection (safeguard of justice, curators, guardianship);
  • Participation in another research involving the human interventionist or at risk and minimal constraints
  • Confined hospitalized patients (SDT, SDRE).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: EEG-neurofeedback training in association with TMS.
EEG-neurofeedback training in association with TMS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MADRS score
Time Frame: Baseline and day 12
Total score at the MADRS (Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale) scale: difference between day 1 and day 12.
Baseline and day 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MADRS score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the MADRS score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
BDI score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the BDI score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
HAM-A score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the HAM-A score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
TCAQ score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the TCAQ score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
BIS-BAS system score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the BIS-BAS system score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
SES score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the SES score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
MHLCS score
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the MHLCS score between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Neuropsychological test
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the neuropsychological performance between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Frontal asymmetry alpha measurement.
Time Frame: Day 1, day 12 and month 1
Difference at the frontal asymmetry alpha between day 1, day 12 and month 1
Day 1, day 12 and month 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominique Drapier, MD, Centre Hospitalier Guillaume Régnier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 12, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35RC16_8939_NEUROFEEDSTIM
  • 2017-A00809-44 (OTHER: ANSM)
  • 17/051-1 (OTHER: CPP Ouest V (Rennes))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on EEG-neurofeedback training in association with TMS.

Search Similar Trials