Effectiveness of the Functional Hand Splint and Specific Tasks in the Domiciliary Environment Applied to Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Effectiveness of the Functional Hand Splint and Specific Tasks in the Domiciliary Environment Applied to Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Randomized Clinical Trial
The main objective:
To determine the effectiveness of a treatment that combines the application of a functional upper limb orthosis together with a home-based program of specific tasks in children with unilateral cerebral palsy versus a home-based program of specific tasks in improving structure and function, activity and participation.
Hypothesis:
The application of a functional upper limb orthosis together with a home-based program of specific tasks in children with unilateral cerebral palsy results in a greater improvement in structure and function, activity and participation compared to the implementation of a home-based specific task program.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Randomized clinical trial with blinding of the evaluator and the person analyzing the data.
A home-based protocol of specific tasks will be performed in both groups and one of the groups will also receive a treatment with upper limb splinting. The assessment will be made by a single evaluator with 10 years of experience in the treatment of children with motor disabilities.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zaragoza, Spain, 50830
- Universidad San Jorge
-
Zaragoza, Spain, 50011
- AIDIMO Asociación para la investigación en la discapacidad motriz
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of unilateral cerebral palsy (hemiplegia-hemiparesis).
- Ages between 5 and 12 years.
- Levels I-III of the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)
- Levels I-III of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
- Able to understand and respond to verbal instructions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cognitive impairment identified by the school report.
- Hand orthopedic surgery in the last 6 months.
- Neuropharmacological intervention in the last 6 months.
- Allergy to upper limb orthosis material.
- Affectation of the manual function not due to the neurological condition (trauma, burn ...).
- Current treatments not compatible with the study.
- Other significant neurological affections (crisis, severe visual impairment ...).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Upper-limb splint and home-based protocol in specific tasks
|
The home-based protocol in specific tasks will be an individualized protocol designed for the child according to the results of the baseline assessment and will require active participation.
It is a program that is integrated into the daily routines of the child.
A study investigator will tell the family the procedure to follow.
In the case that treatment with splint is also received, a researcher of this study will take measurements of the hand and will provide the appropriate splint.
The intensity of the application will be 5 days a week from monday to friday, for 6 hours a day, for a period of 6 weeks.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Home-based protocol in specific tasks
|
The home-based protocol in specific tasks will be an individualized protocol designed for the child according to the results of the baseline assessment and will require active participation.
It is a program that is integrated into the daily routines of the child.
A study investigator will tell the family the procedure to follow.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Outcome_Change from baseline Assisting Hand Assessment measure. Measurement of bimanual performance in pre-established tasks
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Activity measurement: Assisting Hand Assessment.
Measurement of bimanual performance in pre-established tasks.
It quantifies the effectiveness with which the child uses his affected hand in bimanual activities.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
|
Primary Outcome_2. Change from baseline Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire measure. Measurement of bimanual performance in activities of daily living.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Participation and activity measurement: Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire.
The objective of the questionnaire is to measure bimanual performance in activities of daily living.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Outcome_Change from baseline Box and Blocks Test measure. Measurement of unilateral gross manual dexterity.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Activity measurement: Box and Blocks Test assesses unilateral gross manual dexterity.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
|
Secondary Outcome_2. Change from baseline Jebsen Hand Function Test measure. Measurement of a broad range of uni-manual hand functions required for activities of daily living.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Participation measurement: Jebsen Hand Function Test.
The objective of this test is to assess a broad range of uni-manual hand functions required for activities of daily living.7 activities performed with the affected hand and healthy hand separately.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
|
Secondary Outcome_3. Change from baseline House Thumb in Palm Deformity Classification. Classify the deformity level of thumb.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Structure and function measurement: House Thumb in Palm Deformity Classification.
This tool classify the deformity levels taking into account the structure of the thumb.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
|
Secondary Outcome_4. Change from baseline Neurological Hand Deformity Classification. This tool classify the deformity levels of wrist and fingers.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Structure and function measurement: Neurological Hand Deformity Classification.
This tools classify the deformity levels taking into account the wrist, fingers.
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
|
Secondary Outcome_5. Change from baseline Grip and Pinch Strength measure. Measurement of pinch, wrist and foream strength.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Structure and function measurement: Grip and Pinch Strength.
One will be used to Assess the grip of the thumb (Pinch Gauge Dynamometer) and another to assess the strength of the wrist and forearm (Hand and Wrist Dynamometer).
|
Pre-intervention; Post-intervention (6 weeks after); Follow up (8 weeks after the intervention).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: María Ortiz Lucas, PhD, Universidad San Jorge
- Study Director: Vanesa Abuín Porras, PhD, Universidad Europea de Madrid
- Principal Investigator: Patricia Roldán Pérez, MSc, Universidad San Jorge
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Leviton A, Paneth N, Dan B, Jacobsson B, Damiano D; Executive Committee for the Definition of Cerebral Palsy. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Aug;47(8):571-6. doi: 10.1017/s001216220500112x.
- Arner M, Eliasson AC, Nicklasson S, Sommerstein K, Hagglund G. Hand function in cerebral palsy. Report of 367 children in a population-based longitudinal health care program. J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Oct;33(8):1337-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.032.
- Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, Galuppi BE, Russell DJ. Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008 Apr;50(4):249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02045.x. Epub 2008 Mar 1.
- Ozer K, Chesher SP, Scheker LR. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and dynamic bracing for the management of upper-extremity spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;48(7):559-63. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001186.
- Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Jun;50(6):311-9. No abstract available.
- Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, Beckung E, Arner M, Ohrvall AM, Rosenbaum P. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jul;48(7):549-54. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001162.
- Elliott C, Reid S, Hamer P, Alderson J, Elliott B. Lycra((R)) arm splints improve movement fluency in children with cerebral palsy. Gait Posture. 2011 Feb;33(2):214-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
- Jongbloed-Pereboom M, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW, Steenbergen B. Norm scores of the box and block test for children ages 3-10 years. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 May-Jun;67(3):312-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.006643.
- Mathiowetz V, Wiemer DM, Federman SM. Grip and pinch strength: norms for 6- to 19-year-olds. Am J Occup Ther. 1986 Oct;40(10):705-11. doi: 10.5014/ajot.40.10.705.
- Steenbergen B, Gordon AM. Activity limitation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: evidence for disorders in motor planning. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Sep;48(9):780-3. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001666.
- Malagon Valdez J. [Cerebral palsy]. Medicina (B Aires). 2007;67(6 Pt 1):586-92. Spanish.
- Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Neuropsicología humana: Ed. Médica Panamericana; 2006.
- Cioni G, Sales B, Paolicelli PB, Petacchi E, Scusa MF, Canapicchi R. MRI and clinical characteristics of children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Neuropediatrics. 1999 Oct;30(5):249-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973499.
- Robaina-Castellanos GR, Riesgo-Rodriguez S, Robaina-Castellanos MS. [Definition and classification of cerebral palsy: a problem that has already been solved?]. Rev Neurol. 2007 Jul 16-31;45(2):110-7. Spanish.
- Himmelmann K, Uvebrant P. The panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. XI. Changing patterns in the birth-year period 2003-2006. Acta Paediatr. 2014 Jun;103(6):618-24. doi: 10.1111/apa.12614. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
- Pueyo-Benito R, Vendrell-Gomez P, Bargallo-Alabart N, Mercader-Sobreques JM. [Neuroimaging and cerebral palsy]. Rev Neurol. 2002 Sep 1-15;35(5):463-9. Spanish.
- Burtner PA, Poole JL, Torres T, Medora AM, Abeyta R, Keene J, Qualls C. Effect of wrist hand splints on grip, pinch, manual dexterity, and muscle activation in children with spastic hemiplegia: a preliminary study. J Hand Ther. 2008 Jan-Mar;21(1):36-42; quiz 43. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.08.018.
- Koman LA, Gelberman RH, Toby EB, Poehling GG. Cerebral palsy. Management of the upper extremity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Apr;(253):62-74.
- Novak I, Cusick A, Lannin N. Occupational therapy home programs for cerebral palsy: double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):e606-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0288. Epub 2009 Sep 21.
- Morris C. A review of the efficacy of lower-limb orthoses used for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Mar;44(3):205-11. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001943. No abstract available.
- Louwers A, Beelen A, Holmefur M, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Development of the Assisting Hand Assessment for adolescents (Ad-AHA) and validation of the AHA from 18 months to 18 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Dec;58(12):1303-1309. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13168. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
- Holmefur M, Aarts P, Hoare B, Krumlinde-Sundholm L. Test-retest and alternate forms reliability of the assisting hand assessment. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):886-91. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0448.
- Holmefur M, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Assisting Hand Assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 2007 Jan-Feb;61(1):79-84. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.1.79.
- Ohrvall AM, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. The stability of the Manual Ability Classification System over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Feb;56(2):185-9. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12348. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
- Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jun;48(6):424-8. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206000934.
- House JH, Gwathmey FW, Fidler MO. A dynamic approach to the thumb-in palm deformity in cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Feb;63(2):216-25.
- Georgiades M, Elliott C, Wilton J, Blair E, Blackmore M, Garbellini S. The Neurological Hand Deformity Classification for children with cerebral palsy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Dec;61(6):394-402. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12150. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
- Hepping AM, Ploegmakers JJ, Geertzen JH, Bulstra SK, Stevens M. The Influence of Hand Preference on Grip Strength in Children and Adolescents; A Cross-Sectional Study of 2284 Children and Adolescents. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143476. eCollection 2015.
- Mathiowetz V, Federman S, Wiemer D. Box and block test of manual dexterity: norms for 6-19 year olds 52(5):241-5, 1985.
- Amer A, Eliasson AC, Peny-Dahlstrand M, Hermansson L. Validity and test-retest reliability of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jul;58(7):743-9. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12991. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
- Skold A, Hermansson LN, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Eliasson AC. Development and evidence of validity for the Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 May;53(5):436-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03896.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Sears ED, Chung KC. Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jan;35(1):30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
- Roldan-Perez P, Abuin-Porras V, Buesa-Estellez A, Ortiz-Lucas M. Functional Splinting efficacy in a Specific Task Home Program for Children with Cerebral Palsy. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2022 Oct;25(7):469-478. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2022.2099027. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FF_TE_01_Versión 3
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy Infantile
-
NCT07469514Not yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy Infantile
-
NCT07091461Not yet recruitingCerebral Palsy Infantile
-
NCT04395729CompletedCerebral Palsy, Dyskinetic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Infantile Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT01787344CompletedOther Infantile Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT05657548RecruitingCerebral Palsy Infantile
-
NCT06672731Not yet recruiting
-
NCT06616610Recruiting
-
NCT02156713CompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Diplegic, Infantile
-
NCT01834664UnknownAtaxic Infantile Cerebral Palsy
-
NCT06947889RecruitingCerebral Palsy Infantile | Robotic Assisted Gait Training
Clinical Trials on Home-based protocol in specific tasks
-
NCT03458871CompletedNeurogenic Bowel | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
-
NCT06374654Enrolling by invitation
-
NCT04111549CompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Executive Dysfunction
-
NCT07198750RecruitingOsteoarthritis | Knee Osteoarthritis | Gonarthrosis | Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
-
NCT06916819Recruiting